| // Copyright 2016 The Chromium Authors | |
| // | |
| // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); | |
| // you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. | |
| // You may obtain a copy of the License at | |
| // | |
| // https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 | |
| // | |
| // Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software | |
| // distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, | |
| // WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. | |
| // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and | |
| // limitations under the License. | |
| #include "path_builder.h" | |
| #include <algorithm> | |
| #include <memory> | |
| #include <utility> | |
| #include <gmock/gmock.h> | |
| #include <gtest/gtest.h> | |
| #include <openssl/base.h> | |
| #include <openssl/bytestring.h> | |
| #include <openssl/pki/verify.h> | |
| #include <openssl/pool.h> | |
| #include "cert_error_params.h" | |
| #include "cert_issuer_source.h" | |
| #include "cert_issuer_source_static.h" | |
| #include "certificate_policies.h" | |
| #include "common_cert_errors.h" | |
| #include "input.h" | |
| #include "mock_signature_verify_cache.h" | |
| #include "parsed_certificate.h" | |
| #include "signature_algorithm.h" | |
| #include "simple_path_builder_delegate.h" | |
| #include "string_util.h" | |
| #include "test_helpers.h" | |
| #include "trust_store.h" | |
| #include "trust_store_collection.h" | |
| #include "trust_store_in_memory.h" | |
| #include "verify_certificate_chain.h" | |
| BSSL_NAMESPACE_BEGIN | |
| // TODO(crbug.com/634443): Assert the errors for each ResultPath. | |
| namespace { | |
| using ::testing::_; | |
| using ::testing::ContainerEq; | |
| using ::testing::ElementsAre; | |
| using ::testing::ElementsAreArray; | |
| using ::testing::Invoke; | |
| using ::testing::Return; | |
| using ::testing::StrictMock; | |
| class TestPathBuilderDelegate : public SimplePathBuilderDelegate { | |
| public: | |
| TestPathBuilderDelegate(size_t min_rsa_modulus_length_bits, | |
| DigestPolicy digest_policy) | |
| : SimplePathBuilderDelegate(min_rsa_modulus_length_bits, digest_policy) {} | |
| bool IsDeadlineExpired() override { return deadline_is_expired_; } | |
| void SetDeadlineExpiredForTesting(bool deadline_is_expired) { | |
| deadline_is_expired_ = deadline_is_expired; | |
| } | |
| SignatureVerifyCache *GetVerifyCache() override { | |
| return use_signature_cache_ ? &cache_ : nullptr; | |
| } | |
| void ActivateCache() { use_signature_cache_ = true; } | |
| void DeActivateCache() { use_signature_cache_ = false; } | |
| MockSignatureVerifyCache *GetMockVerifyCache() { return &cache_; } | |
| void AllowPrecert() { allow_precertificate_ = true; } | |
| void DisallowPrecert() { allow_precertificate_ = false; } | |
| bool AcceptPreCertificates() override { return allow_precertificate_; } | |
| private: | |
| bool deadline_is_expired_ = false; | |
| bool use_signature_cache_ = false; | |
| bool allow_precertificate_ = false; | |
| MockSignatureVerifyCache cache_; | |
| }; | |
| class CertPathBuilderDelegateBase : public SimplePathBuilderDelegate { | |
| public: | |
| CertPathBuilderDelegateBase() | |
| : SimplePathBuilderDelegate( | |
| 1024, SimplePathBuilderDelegate::DigestPolicy::kWeakAllowSha1) {} | |
| void CheckPathAfterVerification(const CertPathBuilder &path_builder, | |
| CertPathBuilderResultPath *path) override { | |
| ADD_FAILURE() << "Tests must override this"; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| class MockPathBuilderDelegate : public CertPathBuilderDelegateBase { | |
| public: | |
| MOCK_METHOD2(CheckPathAfterVerification, | |
| void(const CertPathBuilder &path_builder, | |
| CertPathBuilderResultPath *path)); | |
| }; | |
| // AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic always returns its certs asynchronously. | |
| class AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic : public CertIssuerSource { | |
| public: | |
| class StaticAsyncRequest : public Request { | |
| public: | |
| explicit StaticAsyncRequest(ParsedCertificateList &&issuers) { | |
| issuers_.swap(issuers); | |
| issuers_iter_ = issuers_.begin(); | |
| } | |
| StaticAsyncRequest(const StaticAsyncRequest &) = delete; | |
| StaticAsyncRequest &operator=(const StaticAsyncRequest &) = delete; | |
| ~StaticAsyncRequest() override = default; | |
| void GetNext(ParsedCertificateList *out_certs) override { | |
| if (issuers_iter_ != issuers_.end()) { | |
| out_certs->push_back(std::move(*issuers_iter_++)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| ParsedCertificateList issuers_; | |
| ParsedCertificateList::iterator issuers_iter_; | |
| }; | |
| ~AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic() override = default; | |
| void SetAsyncGetCallback(std::function<void()> closure) { | |
| async_get_callback_ = std::move(closure); | |
| } | |
| void AddCert(std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> cert) { | |
| static_cert_issuer_source_.AddCert(std::move(cert)); | |
| } | |
| void SyncGetIssuersOf(const ParsedCertificate *cert, | |
| ParsedCertificateList *issuers) override {} | |
| void AsyncGetIssuersOf(const ParsedCertificate *cert, | |
| std::unique_ptr<Request> *out_req) override { | |
| num_async_gets_++; | |
| ParsedCertificateList issuers; | |
| static_cert_issuer_source_.SyncGetIssuersOf(cert, &issuers); | |
| auto req = std::make_unique<StaticAsyncRequest>(std::move(issuers)); | |
| *out_req = std::move(req); | |
| if (async_get_callback_) { | |
| async_get_callback_(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| int num_async_gets() const { return num_async_gets_; } | |
| private: | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic static_cert_issuer_source_; | |
| int num_async_gets_ = 0; | |
| std::function<void()> async_get_callback_ = nullptr; | |
| }; | |
| ::testing::AssertionResult ReadTestPem(const std::string &file_name, | |
| const std::string &block_name, | |
| std::string *result) { | |
| const PemBlockMapping mappings[] = { | |
| {block_name.c_str(), result}, | |
| }; | |
| return ReadTestDataFromPemFile(file_name, mappings); | |
| } | |
| ::testing::AssertionResult ReadTestCert( | |
| const std::string &file_name, | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> *result) { | |
| std::string der; | |
| ::testing::AssertionResult r = ReadTestPem( | |
| "testdata/path_builder_unittest/" + file_name, "CERTIFICATE", &der); | |
| if (!r) { | |
| return r; | |
| } | |
| CertErrors errors; | |
| *result = ParsedCertificate::Create( | |
| bssl::UniquePtr<CRYPTO_BUFFER>(CRYPTO_BUFFER_new( | |
| reinterpret_cast<const uint8_t *>(der.data()), der.size(), nullptr)), | |
| {}, &errors); | |
| if (!*result) { | |
| return ::testing::AssertionFailure() | |
| << "ParseCertificate::Create() failed:\n" | |
| << errors.ToDebugString(); | |
| } | |
| return ::testing::AssertionSuccess(); | |
| } | |
| class PathBuilderMultiRootTest : public ::testing::Test { | |
| public: | |
| PathBuilderMultiRootTest() | |
| : delegate_(1024, TestPathBuilderDelegate::DigestPolicy::kWeakAllowSha1) { | |
| } | |
| void SetUp() override { | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadTestCert("multi-root-A-by-B.pem", &a_by_b_)); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadTestCert("multi-root-B-by-C.pem", &b_by_c_)); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadTestCert("multi-root-B-by-F.pem", &b_by_f_)); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadTestCert("multi-root-C-by-D.pem", &c_by_d_)); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadTestCert("multi-root-C-by-E.pem", &c_by_e_)); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadTestCert("multi-root-D-by-D.pem", &d_by_d_)); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadTestCert("multi-root-E-by-E.pem", &e_by_e_)); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadTestCert("multi-root-F-by-E.pem", &f_by_e_)); | |
| } | |
| protected: | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> a_by_b_, b_by_c_, b_by_f_, c_by_d_, | |
| c_by_e_, d_by_d_, e_by_e_, f_by_e_; | |
| TestPathBuilderDelegate delegate_; | |
| der::GeneralizedTime time_ = {2017, 3, 1, 0, 0, 0}; | |
| const InitialExplicitPolicy initial_explicit_policy_ = | |
| InitialExplicitPolicy::kFalse; | |
| const std::set<der::Input> user_initial_policy_set_ = { | |
| der::Input(kAnyPolicyOid)}; | |
| const InitialPolicyMappingInhibit initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_ = | |
| InitialPolicyMappingInhibit::kFalse; | |
| const InitialAnyPolicyInhibit initial_any_policy_inhibit_ = | |
| InitialAnyPolicyInhibit::kFalse; | |
| }; | |
| // Tests when the target cert has the same name and key as a trust anchor, | |
| // however is signed by a different trust anchor. This should successfully build | |
| // a path, however the trust anchor will be the signer of this cert. | |
| // | |
| // (This test is very similar to TestEndEntityHasSameNameAndSpkiAsTrustAnchor | |
| // but with different data; also in this test the target cert itself is in the | |
| // trust store). | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TargetHasNameAndSpkiOfTrustAnchor) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(a_by_b_); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(b_by_f_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| const auto &path = *result.GetBestValidPath(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, path.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_f_, path.certs[1]); | |
| } | |
| // If the target cert is has the same name and key as a trust anchor, however | |
| // is NOT itself signed by a trust anchor, it fails. Although the provided SPKI | |
| // is trusted, the certificate contents cannot be verified. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TargetWithSameNameAsTrustAnchorFails) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(a_by_b_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(1U, result.max_depth_seen); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test a failed path building when the trust anchor is provided as a | |
| // supplemental certificate. Conceptually the following paths could be built: | |
| // | |
| // B(C) <- C(D) <- [Trust anchor D] | |
| // B(C) <- C(D) <- D(D) <- [Trust anchor D] | |
| // | |
| // However the second one is extraneous given the shorter path. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, SelfSignedTrustAnchorSupplementalCert) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(d_by_d_); | |
| // The (extraneous) trust anchor D(D) is supplied as a certificate, as is the | |
| // intermediate needed for path building C(D). | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(d_by_d_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(c_by_d_); | |
| // C(D) is not valid at this time, so path building will fail. | |
| der::GeneralizedTime expired_time = {2016, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0}; | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| b_by_c_, &trust_store, &delegate_, expired_time, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path0 = *result.paths[0]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path0.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_c_, path0.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(c_by_d_, path0.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(d_by_d_, path0.certs[2]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_NOT_YET_VALID) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test verifying a certificate that is a trust anchor. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TargetIsSelfSignedTrustAnchor) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(e_by_e_); | |
| // This is not necessary for the test, just an extra... | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(f_by_e_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| e_by_e_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // Verifying a trusted leaf certificate is not permitted, however this | |
| // certificate is self-signed, and can chain to itself. | |
| const auto &path = *result.GetBestValidPath(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(e_by_e_, path.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(e_by_e_, path.certs[1]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // If the target cert is directly issued by a trust anchor, it should verify | |
| // without any intermediate certs being provided. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TargetDirectlySignedByTrustAnchor) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(b_by_f_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| const auto &path = *result.GetBestValidPath(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, path.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_f_, path.certs[1]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test that async cert queries are not made if the path can be successfully | |
| // built with synchronously available certs. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TriesSyncFirst) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(e_by_e_); | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_f_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(f_by_e_); | |
| AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic async_certs; | |
| async_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| async_certs.AddCert(c_by_e_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&async_certs); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(0, async_certs.num_async_gets()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // If async queries are needed, all async sources will be queried | |
| // simultaneously. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestAsyncSimultaneous) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(e_by_e_); | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_f_); | |
| AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic async_certs1; | |
| async_certs1.AddCert(c_by_e_); | |
| AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic async_certs2; | |
| async_certs2.AddCert(f_by_e_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&async_certs1); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&async_certs2); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(1, async_certs1.num_async_gets()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(1, async_certs2.num_async_gets()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test that PathBuilder does not generate longer paths than necessary if one of | |
| // the supplied certs is itself a trust anchor. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestLongChain) { | |
| // Both D(D) and C(D) are trusted roots. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(d_by_d_); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(c_by_d_); | |
| // Certs B(C), and C(D) are all supplied. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(c_by_d_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // The result path should be A(B) <- B(C) <- C(D) | |
| // not the longer but also valid A(B) <- B(C) <- C(D) <- D(D) | |
| EXPECT_EQ(3U, result.GetBestValidPath()->certs.size()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test that PathBuilder will backtrack and try a different path if the first | |
| // one doesn't work out. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestBacktracking) { | |
| // Only D(D) is a trusted root. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(d_by_d_); | |
| // Certs B(F) and F(E) are supplied synchronously, thus the path | |
| // A(B) <- B(F) <- F(E) should be built first, though it won't verify. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_f_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(f_by_e_); | |
| // Certs B(C), and C(D) are supplied asynchronously, so the path | |
| // A(B) <- B(C) <- C(D) <- D(D) should be tried second. | |
| AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic async_certs; | |
| async_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| async_certs.AddCert(c_by_d_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&async_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // The partial path should be returned even though it didn't reach a trust | |
| // anchor. | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths.size()); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_f_, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(f_by_e_, result.paths[0]->certs[2]); | |
| // The result path should be A(B) <- B(C) <- C(D) <- D(D) | |
| EXPECT_EQ(1U, result.best_result_index); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path = *result.GetBestValidPath(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(4U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, path.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_c_, path.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(c_by_d_, path.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(d_by_d_, path.certs[3]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test that if no path to a trust anchor was found, the partial path is | |
| // returned. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestOnlyPartialPathResult) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| // Certs B(F) and F(E) are supplied synchronously, thus the path | |
| // A(B) <- B(F) <- F(E) should be built first, though it won't verify. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_f_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(f_by_e_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // The partial path should be returned even though it didn't reach a trust | |
| // anchor. | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_f_, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(f_by_e_, result.paths[0]->certs[2]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test that if two partial paths are returned, the first is marked as the best | |
| // path. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestTwoPartialPathResults) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| // Certs B(F) and F(E) are supplied synchronously, thus the path | |
| // A(B) <- B(F) <- F(E) should be built first, though it won't verify. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_f_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(f_by_e_); | |
| // Certs B(C), and C(D) are supplied asynchronously, so the path | |
| // A(B) <- B(C) <- C(D) <- D(D) should be tried second. | |
| AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic async_certs; | |
| async_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| async_certs.AddCert(c_by_d_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&async_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // First partial path found should be marked as the best one. | |
| EXPECT_EQ(0U, result.best_result_index); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths.size()); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_f_, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(f_by_e_, result.paths[0]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[1]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, result.paths[1]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_c_, result.paths[1]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(c_by_d_, result.paths[1]->certs[2]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test that if no valid path is found, and the first invalid path is a partial | |
| // path, but the 2nd invalid path ends with a cert with a trust record, the 2nd | |
| // path should be preferred. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestDistrustedPathPreferredOverPartialPath) { | |
| // Only D(D) has a trust record, but it is distrusted. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(d_by_d_); | |
| // Certs B(F) and F(E) are supplied synchronously, thus the path | |
| // A(B) <- B(F) <- F(E) should be built first, though it won't verify. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_f_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(f_by_e_); | |
| // Certs B(C), and C(D) are supplied asynchronously, so the path | |
| // A(B) <- B(C) <- C(D) <- D(D) should be tried second. | |
| AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic async_certs; | |
| async_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| async_certs.AddCert(c_by_d_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&async_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // The partial path should be returned even though it didn't reach a trust | |
| // anchor. | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths.size()); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_f_, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(f_by_e_, result.paths[0]->certs[2]); | |
| // The result path should be A(B) <- B(C) <- C(D) <- D(D) | |
| EXPECT_EQ(1U, result.best_result_index); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path = *result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(4U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, path.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_c_, path.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(c_by_d_, path.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(d_by_d_, path.certs[3]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test that whichever order CertIssuerSource returns the issuers, the path | |
| // building still succeeds. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestCertIssuerOrdering) { | |
| // Only D(D) is a trusted root. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(d_by_d_); | |
| for (bool reverse_order : {false, true}) { | |
| SCOPED_TRACE(reverse_order); | |
| std::vector<std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate>> certs = { | |
| b_by_c_, b_by_f_, f_by_e_, c_by_d_, c_by_e_}; | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| if (reverse_order) { | |
| for (auto it = certs.rbegin(); it != certs.rend(); ++it) { | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(*it); | |
| } | |
| } else { | |
| for (const auto &cert : certs) { | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(cert); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // The result path should be A(B) <- B(C) <- C(D) <- D(D) | |
| const auto &path = *result.GetBestValidPath(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(4U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, path.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_c_, path.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(c_by_d_, path.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(d_by_d_, path.certs[3]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestIterationLimit) { | |
| // D(D) is the trust root. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(d_by_d_); | |
| // Certs B(C) and C(D) are supplied. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(c_by_d_); | |
| for (const bool insufficient_limit : {true, false}) { | |
| SCOPED_TRACE(insufficient_limit); | |
| StrictMock<MockPathBuilderDelegate> mock_delegate; | |
| // The CheckPathAfterVerification delegate should be called regardless if | |
| // the iteration limit is reached. | |
| EXPECT_CALL(mock_delegate, CheckPathAfterVerification(_, _)); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &mock_delegate, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| if (insufficient_limit) { | |
| // A limit of one is insufficient to build a path in this case. Therefore | |
| // building is expected to fail in this case. | |
| path_builder.SetIterationLimit(1); | |
| } else { | |
| // The other tests in this file exercise the case that `SetIterationLimit` | |
| // isn't called. Therefore set a sufficient limit for the path to be | |
| // found. | |
| path_builder.SetIterationLimit(5); | |
| } | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(!insufficient_limit, result.HasValidPath()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(insufficient_limit, result.exceeded_iteration_limit); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| if (insufficient_limit) { | |
| EXPECT_EQ(2U, result.iteration_count); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_ITERATION_COUNT_EXCEEDED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } else { | |
| EXPECT_EQ(3U, result.iteration_count); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestTrivialDeadline) { | |
| // C(D) is the trust root. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(c_by_d_); | |
| // Cert B(C) is supplied. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| for (const bool insufficient_limit : {true, false}) { | |
| SCOPED_TRACE(insufficient_limit); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| // Make the deadline either expired or not. | |
| delegate_.SetDeadlineExpiredForTesting(insufficient_limit); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(!insufficient_limit, result.HasValidPath()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(insufficient_limit, result.exceeded_deadline); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(delegate_.IsDeadlineExpired(), insufficient_limit); | |
| if (insufficient_limit) { | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[0]->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kDeadlineExceeded)); | |
| } else { | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_c_, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(c_by_d_, result.paths[0]->certs[2]); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestVerifyCache) { | |
| // C(D) is the trust root. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(c_by_d_); | |
| // Cert B(C) is supplied. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| // Test Activation / DeActivation of the cache. | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(delegate_.GetVerifyCache()); | |
| delegate_.ActivateCache(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(delegate_.GetVerifyCache()); | |
| delegate_.DeActivateCache(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(delegate_.GetVerifyCache()); | |
| delegate_.ActivateCache(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(delegate_.GetVerifyCache()); | |
| for (size_t i = 0; i < 3; i++) { | |
| SCOPED_TRACE(i); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_c_, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(c_by_d_, result.paths[0]->certs[2]); | |
| // The path is 3 certificates long, so requires 2 distinct signature | |
| // verifications. The first time through the loop will cause 2 cache misses | |
| // and stores, subsequent iterations will repeat the same verifications, | |
| // causing 2 cache hits. | |
| EXPECT_EQ(delegate_.GetMockVerifyCache()->CacheHits(), i * 2); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(delegate_.GetMockVerifyCache()->CacheMisses(), 2U); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(delegate_.GetMockVerifyCache()->CacheStores(), 2U); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestDeadline) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(d_by_d_); | |
| // Cert B(C) is supplied statically. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| // Cert C(D) is supplied asynchronously and will expire the deadline before | |
| // returning the async result. | |
| AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic async_certs; | |
| async_certs.AddCert(c_by_d_); | |
| async_certs.SetAsyncGetCallback( | |
| [&] { delegate_.SetDeadlineExpiredForTesting(true); }); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&async_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.exceeded_deadline); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(delegate_.IsDeadlineExpired()); | |
| // The chain returned should end in c_by_d_, since the deadline would only be | |
| // checked again after the async results had been checked (since | |
| // AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic makes the async results available immediately.) | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_c_, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(c_by_d_, result.paths[0]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE( | |
| result.paths[0]->errors.ContainsError(cert_errors::kDeadlineExceeded)); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_DEADLINE_EXCEEDED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestDepthLimit) { | |
| // D(D) is the trust root. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(d_by_d_); | |
| // Certs B(C) and C(D) are supplied. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(c_by_d_); | |
| for (const bool insufficient_limit : {true, false}) { | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| if (insufficient_limit) { | |
| // A limit of depth equal to 2 is insufficient to build the path. | |
| // Therefore, building is expected to fail. | |
| path_builder.SetDepthLimit(2); | |
| } else { | |
| // The other tests in this file exercise the case that `SetDepthLimit` | |
| // isn't called. Therefore, set a sufficient limit for the path to be | |
| // found. | |
| path_builder.SetDepthLimit(5); | |
| } | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(!insufficient_limit, result.HasValidPath()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(insufficient_limit, | |
| result.AnyPathContainsError(cert_errors::kDepthLimitExceeded)); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| if (insufficient_limit) { | |
| EXPECT_EQ(2U, result.max_depth_seen); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_DEPTH_LIMIT_REACHED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } else { | |
| EXPECT_EQ(4U, result.max_depth_seen); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestDepthLimitMultiplePaths) { | |
| // This case tests path building backtracking due to reaching the path depth | |
| // limit. Given the root and issuer certificates below, there can be two paths | |
| // from between the leaf to a trusted root, one has length of 3 and the other | |
| // has length of 4. These certificates are specifically chosen because path | |
| // building will first explore the 4-certificate long path then the | |
| // 3-certificate long path. So with a depth limit of 3, we can test the | |
| // backtracking code path. | |
| // E(E) and C(D) are the trust roots. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(e_by_e_); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(c_by_d_); | |
| // Certs B(C). B(F) and F(E) are supplied. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_c_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(b_by_f_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(f_by_e_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| a_by_b_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| path_builder.SetDepthLimit(3); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.AnyPathContainsError(cert_errors::kDepthLimitExceeded)); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(result.paths.size(), 2u); | |
| const CertPathBuilderResultPath *truncated_path = result.paths[0].get(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(truncated_path->IsValid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE( | |
| truncated_path->errors.ContainsError(cert_errors::kDepthLimitExceeded)); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(truncated_path->certs.size(), 3u); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, truncated_path->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_f_, truncated_path->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(f_by_e_, truncated_path->certs[2]); | |
| const CertPathBuilderResultPath *valid_path = result.paths[1].get(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(valid_path->IsValid()); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE( | |
| valid_path->errors.ContainsError(cert_errors::kDepthLimitExceeded)); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(valid_path->certs.size(), 3u); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(a_by_b_, valid_path->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(b_by_c_, valid_path->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(c_by_d_, valid_path->certs[2]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderMultiRootTest, TestPreCertificate) { | |
| std::string test_dir = "testdata/path_builder_unittest/precertificate/"; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> root1 = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "root.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(root1); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> target = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "precertificate.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(target); | |
| der::GeneralizedTime precert_time = {2023, 10, 1, 0, 0, 0}; | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(root1); | |
| // PreCertificate should be rejected by default. | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(delegate_.AcceptPreCertificates()); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target, &trust_store, &delegate_, precert_time, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| ASSERT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()) | |
| << result.paths[0]->errors.ToDebugString(result.paths[0]->certs); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| // PreCertificate should be accepted if configured. | |
| delegate_.AllowPrecert(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(delegate_.AcceptPreCertificates()); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder2( | |
| target, &trust_store, &delegate_, precert_time, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| auto result2 = path_builder2.Run(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result2.paths.size()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result2.paths[0]->IsValid()) | |
| << result2.paths[0]->errors.ToDebugString(result.paths[0]->certs); | |
| VerifyError error2 = result2.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error2.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error2.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| class PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest : public ::testing::Test { | |
| public: | |
| PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest() | |
| : delegate_(1024, | |
| SimplePathBuilderDelegate::DigestPolicy::kWeakAllowSha1) {} | |
| void SetUp() override { | |
| ParsedCertificateList path; | |
| VerifyCertChainTest test; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadVerifyCertChainTestFromFile( | |
| "testdata/verify_certificate_chain_unittest/key-rollover/oldchain.test", | |
| &test)); | |
| path = test.chain; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path.size()); | |
| target_ = path[0]; | |
| oldintermediate_ = path[1]; | |
| oldroot_ = path[2]; | |
| time_ = test.time; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(target_); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(oldintermediate_); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadVerifyCertChainTestFromFile( | |
| "testdata/verify_certificate_chain_unittest/" | |
| "key-rollover/longrolloverchain.test", | |
| &test)); | |
| path = test.chain; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(5U, path.size()); | |
| newintermediate_ = path[1]; | |
| newroot_ = path[2]; | |
| newrootrollover_ = path[3]; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(newintermediate_); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(newroot_); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(newrootrollover_); | |
| } | |
| protected: | |
| // oldroot-------->newrootrollover newroot | |
| // | | | | |
| // v v v | |
| // oldintermediate newintermediate | |
| // | | | |
| // +------------+-------------+ | |
| // | | |
| // v | |
| // target | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> target_; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> oldintermediate_; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> newintermediate_; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> oldroot_; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> newroot_; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> newrootrollover_; | |
| SimplePathBuilderDelegate delegate_; | |
| der::GeneralizedTime time_; | |
| const InitialExplicitPolicy initial_explicit_policy_ = | |
| InitialExplicitPolicy::kFalse; | |
| const std::set<der::Input> user_initial_policy_set_ = { | |
| der::Input(kAnyPolicyOid)}; | |
| const InitialPolicyMappingInhibit initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_ = | |
| InitialPolicyMappingInhibit::kFalse; | |
| const InitialAnyPolicyInhibit initial_any_policy_inhibit_ = | |
| InitialAnyPolicyInhibit::kFalse; | |
| }; | |
| // Tests that if only the old root cert is trusted, the path builder can build a | |
| // path through the new intermediate and rollover cert to the old root. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, TestRolloverOnlyOldRootTrusted) { | |
| // Only oldroot is trusted. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(oldroot_); | |
| // Old intermediate cert is not provided, so the pathbuilder will need to go | |
| // through the rollover cert. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newintermediate_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newrootrollover_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // Due to authorityKeyIdentifier prioritization, path builder will first | |
| // attempt: target <- newintermediate <- newrootrollover <- oldroot | |
| // which will succeed. | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| const auto &path0 = *result.paths[0]; | |
| EXPECT_EQ(0U, result.best_result_index); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(path0.IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(4U, path0.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path0.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path0.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newrootrollover_, path0.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldroot_, path0.certs[3]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Tests that if both old and new roots are trusted it builds a path through | |
| // the new intermediate. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, TestRolloverBothRootsTrusted) { | |
| // Both oldroot and newroot are trusted. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(oldroot_); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(newroot_); | |
| // Both old and new intermediates + rollover cert are provided. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(oldintermediate_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newintermediate_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newrootrollover_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| const auto &path = *result.paths[0]; | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path.certs[0]); | |
| // The newer intermediate should be used as newer certs are prioritized in | |
| // path building. | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path.certs[2]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // If trust anchor query returned no results, and there are no issuer | |
| // sources, path building should fail at that point. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, TestAnchorsNoMatchAndNoIssuerSources) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(newroot_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| const auto &path = *result.paths[0]; | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path.certs[0]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // If a path to a trust anchor could not be found, and the last issuer(s) in | |
| // the chain were culled by the loop checker, the partial path up to that point | |
| // should be returned. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, TestReturnsPartialPathEndedByLoopChecker) { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newintermediate_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newroot_); | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic rollover_certs; | |
| rollover_certs.AddCert(newrootrollover_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| // The rollover root is added as a second issuer source to ensure we get paths | |
| // back in a deterministic order, otherwise newroot and newrootrollover do not | |
| // differ in any way that the path builder would use for prioritizing which | |
| // path comes back first. | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&rollover_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths.size()); | |
| // Since none of the certs are trusted, the path builder should build 4 | |
| // candidate paths, all of which are disallowed due to the loop checker: | |
| // target->newintermediate->newroot->newroot | |
| // target->newintermediate->newroot->newrootrollover | |
| // target->newintermediate->newrootrollover->newroot | |
| // target->newintermediate->newrootrollover->newrootrollover | |
| // This should end up returning the 2 partial paths which are the longest | |
| // paths for which no acceptable issuers could be found: | |
| // target->newintermediate->newroot | |
| // target->newintermediate->newrootrollover | |
| { | |
| const auto &path = *result.paths[0]; | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(path.IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(path.errors.ContainsError(cert_errors::kNoIssuersFound)); | |
| } | |
| { | |
| const auto &path = *result.paths[1]; | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(path.IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newrootrollover_, path.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(path.errors.ContainsError(cert_errors::kNoIssuersFound)); | |
| } | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Tests that multiple trust root matches on a single path will be considered. | |
| // Both roots have the same subject but different keys. Only one of them will | |
| // verify. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, TestMultipleRootMatchesOnlyOneWorks) { | |
| TrustStoreCollection trust_store_collection; | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store1; | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store2; | |
| trust_store_collection.AddTrustStore(&trust_store1); | |
| trust_store_collection.AddTrustStore(&trust_store2); | |
| // Add two trust anchors (newroot_ and oldroot_). Path building will attempt | |
| // them in this same order, as trust_store1 was added to | |
| // trust_store_collection first. | |
| trust_store1.AddTrustAnchor(newroot_); | |
| trust_store2.AddTrustAnchor(oldroot_); | |
| // Only oldintermediate is supplied, so the path with newroot should fail, | |
| // oldroot should succeed. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(oldintermediate_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store_collection, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| // Due to authorityKeyIdentifier prioritization, path builder will first | |
| // attempt: target <- old intermediate <- oldroot | |
| // which should succeed. | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[result.best_result_index]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path = *result.paths[result.best_result_index]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldintermediate_, path.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldroot_, path.certs[2]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Tests that the path builder doesn't build longer than necessary paths, | |
| // by skipping certs where the same Name+SAN+SPKI is already in the current | |
| // path. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, TestRolloverLongChain) { | |
| // Only oldroot is trusted. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(oldroot_); | |
| // New intermediate and new root are provided synchronously. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newintermediate_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newroot_); | |
| // Rollover cert is only provided asynchronously. This will force the | |
| // pathbuilder to first try building a longer than necessary path. | |
| AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic async_certs; | |
| async_certs.AddCert(newrootrollover_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&async_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths.size()); | |
| // Path builder will first attempt: | |
| // target <- newintermediate <- newroot <- oldroot | |
| // but it will fail since newroot is self-signed. | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path0 = *result.paths[0]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(4U, path0.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path0.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path0.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path0.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldroot_, path0.certs[3]); | |
| // Path builder will next attempt: target <- newintermediate <- oldroot | |
| // but it will fail since newintermediate is signed by newroot. | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path1 = *result.paths[1]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path1.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path1.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path1.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldroot_, path1.certs[2]); | |
| // Path builder will skip: | |
| // target <- newintermediate <- newroot <- newrootrollover <- ... | |
| // Since newroot and newrootrollover have the same Name+SAN+SPKI. | |
| // Finally path builder will use: | |
| // target <- newintermediate <- newrootrollover <- oldroot | |
| EXPECT_EQ(2U, result.best_result_index); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[2]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path2 = *result.paths[2]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(4U, path2.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path2.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path2.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newrootrollover_, path2.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldroot_, path2.certs[3]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Tests that when SetExploreAllPaths is combined with SetIterationLimit the | |
| // path builder will return all the paths that were able to be built before the | |
| // iteration limit was reached. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, ExploreAllPathsWithIterationLimit) { | |
| struct Expectation { | |
| int iteration_limit; | |
| size_t expected_num_paths; | |
| std::vector<std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate>> partial_path; | |
| } kExpectations[] = { | |
| // No iteration limit. All possible paths should be built. | |
| {0, 4, {}}, | |
| // Limit 1 is only enough to reach the intermediate, no complete path | |
| // should be built. | |
| {1, 0, {target_, newintermediate_}}, | |
| // Limit 2 allows reaching the root on the first path. | |
| {2, 1, {target_, newintermediate_}}, | |
| // Next iteration uses oldroot instead of newroot. | |
| {3, 2, {target_, newintermediate_}}, | |
| // Backtracking to the target cert. | |
| {4, 2, {target_}}, | |
| // Adding oldintermediate. | |
| {5, 2, {target_, oldintermediate_}}, | |
| // Trying oldroot. | |
| {6, 3, {target_, oldintermediate_}}, | |
| // Trying newroot. | |
| {7, 4, {target_, oldintermediate_}}, | |
| }; | |
| // Trust both old and new roots. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(oldroot_); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(newroot_); | |
| // Intermediates and root rollover are all provided synchronously. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(oldintermediate_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newintermediate_); | |
| for (const auto &expectation : kExpectations) { | |
| SCOPED_TRACE(expectation.iteration_limit); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| // Explore all paths, rather than stopping at the first valid path. | |
| path_builder.SetExploreAllPaths(true); | |
| // Limit the number of iterations. | |
| path_builder.SetIterationLimit(expectation.iteration_limit); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(expectation.expected_num_paths > 0, result.HasValidPath()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| if (expectation.expected_num_paths > 0) { | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } else { | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_ITERATION_COUNT_EXCEEDED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| if (expectation.partial_path.empty()) { | |
| ASSERT_EQ(expectation.expected_num_paths, result.paths.size()); | |
| } else { | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1 + expectation.expected_num_paths, result.paths.size()); | |
| const auto &path = *result.paths[result.paths.size() - 1]; | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(path.IsValid()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(expectation.partial_path, path.certs); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE( | |
| path.errors.ContainsError(cert_errors::kIterationLimitExceeded)); | |
| } | |
| if (expectation.expected_num_paths > 0) { | |
| // Path builder will first build path: target <- newintermediate <- | |
| // newroot | |
| const auto &path0 = *result.paths[0]; | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(path0.IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path0.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path0.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path0.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path0.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(3U, result.max_depth_seen); | |
| } | |
| if (expectation.expected_num_paths > 1) { | |
| // Next path: target <- newintermediate <- oldroot | |
| const auto &path1 = *result.paths[1]; | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(path1.IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path1.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path1.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path1.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldroot_, path1.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(3U, result.max_depth_seen); | |
| } | |
| if (expectation.expected_num_paths > 2) { | |
| // Next path: target <- oldintermediate <- oldroot | |
| const auto &path2 = *result.paths[2]; | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(path2.IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path2.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path2.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldintermediate_, path2.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldroot_, path2.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(3U, result.max_depth_seen); | |
| } | |
| if (expectation.expected_num_paths > 3) { | |
| // Final path: target <- oldintermediate <- newroot | |
| const auto &path3 = *result.paths[3]; | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(path3.IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path3.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path3.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldintermediate_, path3.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path3.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(3U, result.max_depth_seen); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Tests that when SetValidPathLimit is used path builder returns the number of | |
| // valid paths we expect before the valid path limit was reached. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, ExplorePathsWithPathLimit) { | |
| struct Expectation { | |
| size_t valid_path_limit; | |
| size_t expected_num_paths; | |
| } kExpectations[] = { | |
| {0, 4}, // No path limit. Three valid, one partial path should be built | |
| {1, 1}, // One valid path | |
| {2, 3}, // Two valid, one partial | |
| {3, 4}, {4, 4}, {5, 4}, | |
| }; | |
| // Trust both old and new roots. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(oldroot_); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(newroot_); | |
| // Intermediates and root rollover are all provided synchronously. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(oldintermediate_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newintermediate_); | |
| for (const auto &expectation : kExpectations) { | |
| SCOPED_TRACE(expectation.valid_path_limit); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| // Stop after finding enough valid paths. | |
| path_builder.SetValidPathLimit(expectation.valid_path_limit); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(expectation.expected_num_paths, result.paths.size()); | |
| if (result.paths.size() > 0) { | |
| // Path builder will first build path: target <- newintermediate <- | |
| // newroot | |
| const auto &path0 = *result.paths[0]; | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(path0.IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path0.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path0.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path0.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path0.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(3U, result.max_depth_seen); | |
| } | |
| if (result.paths.size() > 1) { | |
| // Next path: target <- newintermediate <- oldroot | |
| const auto &path1 = *result.paths[1]; | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(path1.IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path1.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path1.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path1.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldroot_, path1.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(3U, result.max_depth_seen); | |
| } | |
| if (result.paths.size() > 2) { | |
| // Next path: target <- oldintermediate <- oldroot | |
| const auto &path2 = *result.paths[2]; | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(path2.IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path2.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path2.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldintermediate_, path2.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldroot_, path2.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(3U, result.max_depth_seen); | |
| } | |
| if (result.paths.size() > 3) { | |
| // Final path: target <- oldintermediate <- newroot | |
| const auto &path3 = *result.paths[3]; | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(path3.IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path3.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path3.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldintermediate_, path3.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path3.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(3U, result.max_depth_seen); | |
| } | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // If the target cert is a trust anchor, however is not itself *signed* by a | |
| // trust anchor, then it is not considered valid (the SPKI and name of the | |
| // trust anchor matches the SPKI and subject of the target certificate, but the | |
| // rest of the certificate cannot be verified). | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, TestEndEntityIsTrustRoot) { | |
| // Trust newintermediate. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(newintermediate_); | |
| // Newintermediate is also the target cert. | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| newintermediate_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // If target has same Name+SAN+SPKI as a necessary intermediate, test if a path | |
| // can still be built. | |
| // Since LoopChecker will prevent the intermediate from being included, this | |
| // currently does NOT verify. This case shouldn't occur in the web PKI. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, | |
| TestEndEntityHasSameNameAndSpkiAsIntermediate) { | |
| // Trust oldroot. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(oldroot_); | |
| // New root rollover is provided synchronously. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newrootrollover_); | |
| // Newroot is the target cert. | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| newroot_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| // This could actually be OK, but CertPathBuilder does not build the | |
| // newroot <- newrootrollover <- oldroot path. | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID_SIGNATURE) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // If target has same Name+SAN+SPKI as the trust root, test that a (trivial) | |
| // path can still be built. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, | |
| TestEndEntityHasSameNameAndSpkiAsTrustAnchor) { | |
| // Trust newrootrollover. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(newrootrollover_); | |
| // Newroot is the target cert. | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| newroot_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| const CertPathBuilderResultPath *best_result = result.GetBestValidPath(); | |
| // Newroot has same name+SPKI as newrootrollover, thus the path is valid and | |
| // only contains newroot. | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(best_result->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, best_result->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, best_result->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newrootrollover_, best_result->certs[1]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test that PathBuilder will not try the same path twice if multiple | |
| // CertIssuerSources provide the same certificate. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, TestDuplicateIntermediates) { | |
| // Create a separate copy of oldintermediate. | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> oldintermediate_dupe( | |
| ParsedCertificate::Create( | |
| bssl::UniquePtr<CRYPTO_BUFFER>( | |
| CRYPTO_BUFFER_new(oldintermediate_->der_cert().data(), | |
| oldintermediate_->der_cert().size(), nullptr)), | |
| {}, nullptr)); | |
| // Only newroot is a trusted root. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(newroot_); | |
| // The oldintermediate is supplied synchronously by `sync_certs1` and | |
| // another copy of oldintermediate is supplied synchronously by `sync_certs2`. | |
| // The path target <- oldintermediate <- newroot should be built first, | |
| // though it won't verify. It should not be attempted again even though | |
| // oldintermediate was supplied twice. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs1; | |
| sync_certs1.AddCert(oldintermediate_); | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs2; | |
| sync_certs2.AddCert(oldintermediate_dupe); | |
| // The newintermediate is supplied asynchronously, so the path | |
| // target <- newintermediate <- newroot should be tried second. | |
| AsyncCertIssuerSourceStatic async_certs; | |
| async_certs.AddCert(newintermediate_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs1); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs2); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&async_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths.size()); | |
| // Path builder will first attempt: target <- oldintermediate <- newroot | |
| // but it will fail since oldintermediate is signed by oldroot. | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path0 = *result.paths[0]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path0.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path0.certs[0]); | |
| // Compare the DER instead of ParsedCertificate pointer, don't care which copy | |
| // of oldintermediate was used in the path. | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldintermediate_->der_cert(), path0.certs[1]->der_cert()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path0.certs[2]); | |
| // Path builder will next attempt: target <- newintermediate <- newroot | |
| // which will succeed. | |
| EXPECT_EQ(1U, result.best_result_index); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path1 = *result.paths[1]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path1.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path1.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path1.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path1.certs[2]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test when PathBuilder is given a cert via CertIssuerSources that has the same | |
| // SPKI as a trust anchor. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, TestDuplicateIntermediateAndRoot) { | |
| // Create a separate copy of newroot. | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> newroot_dupe( | |
| ParsedCertificate::Create( | |
| bssl::UniquePtr<CRYPTO_BUFFER>( | |
| CRYPTO_BUFFER_new(newroot_->der_cert().data(), | |
| newroot_->der_cert().size(), nullptr)), | |
| {}, nullptr)); | |
| // Only newroot is a trusted root. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(newroot_); | |
| // The oldintermediate and newroot are supplied synchronously by `sync_certs`. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic sync_certs; | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(oldintermediate_); | |
| sync_certs.AddCert(newroot_dupe); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&sync_certs); | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1U, result.paths.size()); | |
| // Path builder attempt: target <- oldintermediate <- newroot | |
| // but it will fail since oldintermediate is signed by oldroot. | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path = *result.paths[0]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldintermediate_, path.certs[1]); | |
| // Compare the DER instead of ParsedCertificate pointer, don't care which copy | |
| // of newroot was used in the path. | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_->der_cert(), path.certs[2]->der_cert()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID_SIGNATURE) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| class MockCertIssuerSourceRequest : public CertIssuerSource::Request { | |
| public: | |
| MOCK_METHOD1(GetNext, void(ParsedCertificateList *)); | |
| }; | |
| class MockCertIssuerSource : public CertIssuerSource { | |
| public: | |
| MOCK_METHOD2(SyncGetIssuersOf, | |
| void(const ParsedCertificate *, ParsedCertificateList *)); | |
| MOCK_METHOD2(AsyncGetIssuersOf, | |
| void(const ParsedCertificate *, std::unique_ptr<Request> *)); | |
| }; | |
| // Helper class to pass the Request to the PathBuilder when it calls | |
| // AsyncGetIssuersOf. (GoogleMock has a ByMove helper, but it apparently can | |
| // only be used with Return, not SetArgPointee.) | |
| class CertIssuerSourceRequestMover { | |
| public: | |
| explicit CertIssuerSourceRequestMover( | |
| std::unique_ptr<CertIssuerSource::Request> req) | |
| : request_(std::move(req)) {} | |
| void MoveIt(const ParsedCertificate *cert, | |
| std::unique_ptr<CertIssuerSource::Request> *out_req) { | |
| *out_req = std::move(request_); | |
| } | |
| private: | |
| std::unique_ptr<CertIssuerSource::Request> request_; | |
| }; | |
| // Functor that when called with a ParsedCertificateList* will append the | |
| // specified certificate. | |
| class AppendCertToList { | |
| public: | |
| explicit AppendCertToList( | |
| const std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> &cert) | |
| : cert_(cert) {} | |
| void operator()(ParsedCertificateList *out) { out->push_back(cert_); } | |
| private: | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> cert_; | |
| }; | |
| // Test that a single CertIssuerSource returning multiple async batches of | |
| // issuers is handled correctly. Due to the StrictMocks, it also tests that path | |
| // builder does not request issuers of certs that it shouldn't. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, TestMultipleAsyncIssuersFromSingleSource) { | |
| StrictMock<MockCertIssuerSource> cert_issuer_source; | |
| // Only newroot is a trusted root. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(newroot_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&cert_issuer_source); | |
| // Create the mock CertIssuerSource::Request... | |
| auto target_issuers_req_owner = | |
| std::make_unique<StrictMock<MockCertIssuerSourceRequest>>(); | |
| // Keep a raw pointer to the Request... | |
| StrictMock<MockCertIssuerSourceRequest> *target_issuers_req = | |
| target_issuers_req_owner.get(); | |
| // Setup helper class to pass ownership of the Request to the PathBuilder when | |
| // it calls AsyncGetIssuersOf. | |
| CertIssuerSourceRequestMover req_mover(std::move(target_issuers_req_owner)); | |
| { | |
| ::testing::InSequence s; | |
| EXPECT_CALL(cert_issuer_source, SyncGetIssuersOf(target_.get(), _)); | |
| EXPECT_CALL(cert_issuer_source, AsyncGetIssuersOf(target_.get(), _)) | |
| .WillOnce(Invoke(&req_mover, &CertIssuerSourceRequestMover::MoveIt)); | |
| } | |
| EXPECT_CALL(*target_issuers_req, GetNext(_)) | |
| // First async batch: return oldintermediate_. | |
| .WillOnce(AppendCertToList(oldintermediate_)) | |
| // Second async batch: return newintermediate_. | |
| .WillOnce(AppendCertToList(newintermediate_)); | |
| { | |
| ::testing::InSequence s; | |
| // oldintermediate_ does not create a valid path, so both sync and async | |
| // lookups are expected. | |
| EXPECT_CALL(cert_issuer_source, | |
| SyncGetIssuersOf(oldintermediate_.get(), _)); | |
| EXPECT_CALL(cert_issuer_source, | |
| AsyncGetIssuersOf(oldintermediate_.get(), _)); | |
| } | |
| // newroot_ is in the trust store, so this path will be completed | |
| // synchronously. AsyncGetIssuersOf will not be called on newintermediate_. | |
| EXPECT_CALL(cert_issuer_source, SyncGetIssuersOf(newintermediate_.get(), _)); | |
| // Ensure pathbuilder finished and filled result. | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| // Note that VerifyAndClearExpectations(target_issuers_req) is not called | |
| // here. PathBuilder could have destroyed it already, so just let the | |
| // expectations get checked by the destructor. | |
| ::testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&cert_issuer_source); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths.size()); | |
| // Path builder first attempts: target <- oldintermediate <- newroot | |
| // but it will fail since oldintermediate is signed by oldroot. | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path0 = *result.paths[0]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path0.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path0.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldintermediate_, path0.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path0.certs[2]); | |
| // After the second batch of async results, path builder will attempt: | |
| // target <- newintermediate <- newroot which will succeed. | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path1 = *result.paths[1]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path1.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path1.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path1.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path1.certs[2]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| // Test that PathBuilder will not try the same path twice if CertIssuerSources | |
| // asynchronously provide the same certificate multiple times. | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderKeyRolloverTest, TestDuplicateAsyncIntermediates) { | |
| StrictMock<MockCertIssuerSource> cert_issuer_source; | |
| // Only newroot is a trusted root. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(newroot_); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target_, &trust_store, &delegate_, time_, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| initial_explicit_policy_, user_initial_policy_set_, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit_, initial_any_policy_inhibit_); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&cert_issuer_source); | |
| // Create the mock CertIssuerSource::Request... | |
| auto target_issuers_req_owner = | |
| std::make_unique<StrictMock<MockCertIssuerSourceRequest>>(); | |
| // Keep a raw pointer to the Request... | |
| StrictMock<MockCertIssuerSourceRequest> *target_issuers_req = | |
| target_issuers_req_owner.get(); | |
| // Setup helper class to pass ownership of the Request to the PathBuilder when | |
| // it calls AsyncGetIssuersOf. | |
| CertIssuerSourceRequestMover req_mover(std::move(target_issuers_req_owner)); | |
| { | |
| ::testing::InSequence s; | |
| EXPECT_CALL(cert_issuer_source, SyncGetIssuersOf(target_.get(), _)); | |
| EXPECT_CALL(cert_issuer_source, AsyncGetIssuersOf(target_.get(), _)) | |
| .WillOnce(Invoke(&req_mover, &CertIssuerSourceRequestMover::MoveIt)); | |
| } | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> oldintermediate_dupe( | |
| ParsedCertificate::Create( | |
| bssl::UniquePtr<CRYPTO_BUFFER>( | |
| CRYPTO_BUFFER_new(oldintermediate_->der_cert().data(), | |
| oldintermediate_->der_cert().size(), nullptr)), | |
| {}, nullptr)); | |
| EXPECT_CALL(*target_issuers_req, GetNext(_)) | |
| // First async batch: return oldintermediate_. | |
| .WillOnce(AppendCertToList(oldintermediate_)) | |
| // Second async batch: return a different copy of oldintermediate_ again. | |
| .WillOnce(AppendCertToList(oldintermediate_dupe)) | |
| // Third async batch: return newintermediate_. | |
| .WillOnce(AppendCertToList(newintermediate_)); | |
| { | |
| ::testing::InSequence s; | |
| // oldintermediate_ does not create a valid path, so both sync and async | |
| // lookups are expected. | |
| EXPECT_CALL(cert_issuer_source, | |
| SyncGetIssuersOf(oldintermediate_.get(), _)); | |
| EXPECT_CALL(cert_issuer_source, | |
| AsyncGetIssuersOf(oldintermediate_.get(), _)); | |
| } | |
| // newroot_ is in the trust store, so this path will be completed | |
| // synchronously. AsyncGetIssuersOf will not be called on newintermediate_. | |
| EXPECT_CALL(cert_issuer_source, SyncGetIssuersOf(newintermediate_.get(), _)); | |
| // Ensure pathbuilder finished and filled result. | |
| auto result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| ::testing::Mock::VerifyAndClearExpectations(&cert_issuer_source); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths.size()); | |
| // Path builder first attempts: target <- oldintermediate <- newroot | |
| // but it will fail since oldintermediate is signed by oldroot. | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path0 = *result.paths[0]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path0.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path0.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(oldintermediate_, path0.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path0.certs[2]); | |
| // The second async result does not generate any path. | |
| // After the third batch of async results, path builder will attempt: | |
| // target <- newintermediate <- newroot which will succeed. | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| const auto &path1 = *result.paths[1]; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, path1.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target_, path1.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newintermediate_, path1.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(newroot_, path1.certs[2]); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| class PathBuilderSimpleChainTest : public ::testing::Test { | |
| public: | |
| PathBuilderSimpleChainTest() = default; | |
| protected: | |
| void SetUp() override { | |
| // Read a simple test chain comprised of a target, intermediate, and root. | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadVerifyCertChainTestFromFile( | |
| "testdata/verify_certificate_chain_unittest/target-and-intermediate/" | |
| "main.test", | |
| &test_)); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3u, test_.chain.size()); | |
| } | |
| // Runs the path builder for the target certificate while `distrusted_cert` is | |
| // blocked, and `delegate` if non-null. | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result RunPathBuilder( | |
| const std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> &distrusted_cert, | |
| CertPathBuilderDelegate *optional_delegate) { | |
| // Set up the trust store such that `distrusted_cert` is blocked, and | |
| // the root is trusted (except if it was `distrusted_cert`). | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| if (distrusted_cert != test_.chain.back()) { | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(test_.chain.back()); | |
| } | |
| if (distrusted_cert) { | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(distrusted_cert); | |
| } | |
| // Add the single intermediate. | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic intermediates; | |
| intermediates.AddCert(test_.chain[1]); | |
| SimplePathBuilderDelegate default_delegate( | |
| 1024, SimplePathBuilderDelegate::DigestPolicy::kWeakAllowSha1); | |
| CertPathBuilderDelegate *delegate = | |
| optional_delegate ? optional_delegate : &default_delegate; | |
| const InitialExplicitPolicy initial_explicit_policy = | |
| InitialExplicitPolicy::kFalse; | |
| const std::set<der::Input> user_initial_policy_set = { | |
| der::Input(kAnyPolicyOid)}; | |
| const InitialPolicyMappingInhibit initial_policy_mapping_inhibit = | |
| InitialPolicyMappingInhibit::kFalse; | |
| const InitialAnyPolicyInhibit initial_any_policy_inhibit = | |
| InitialAnyPolicyInhibit::kFalse; | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| test_.chain.front(), &trust_store, delegate, test_.time, | |
| KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, initial_explicit_policy, user_initial_policy_set, | |
| initial_policy_mapping_inhibit, initial_any_policy_inhibit); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&intermediates); | |
| return path_builder.Run(); | |
| } | |
| protected: | |
| VerifyCertChainTest test_; | |
| }; | |
| // Test fixture for running the path builder over a simple chain, while varying | |
| // the trustedness of certain certificates. | |
| class PathBuilderDistrustTest : public PathBuilderSimpleChainTest { | |
| public: | |
| PathBuilderDistrustTest() = default; | |
| protected: | |
| // Runs the path builder for the target certificate while `distrusted_cert` is | |
| // blocked. | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result RunPathBuilderWithDistrustedCert( | |
| const std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> &distrusted_cert) { | |
| return RunPathBuilder(distrusted_cert, nullptr); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| // Tests that path building fails when the target, intermediate, or root are | |
| // distrusted (but the path is otherwise valid). | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderDistrustTest, TargetIntermediateRoot) { | |
| // First do a control test -- path building without any blocked | |
| // certificates should work. | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = RunPathBuilderWithDistrustedCert(nullptr); | |
| { | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // The built path should be identical to the one read from disk. | |
| const auto &path = *result.GetBestValidPath(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(test_.chain.size(), path.certs.size()); | |
| for (size_t i = 0; i < test_.chain.size(); ++i) { | |
| EXPECT_EQ(test_.chain[i], path.certs[i]); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Try path building when only the target is blocked - should fail. | |
| result = RunPathBuilderWithDistrustedCert(test_.chain[0]); | |
| { | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_LT(result.best_result_index, result.paths.size()); | |
| const auto &best_path = result.paths[result.best_result_index]; | |
| // The built chain has length 1 since path building stopped once | |
| // it encountered the blocked certificate (target). | |
| ASSERT_EQ(1u, best_path->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(best_path->certs[0], test_.chain[0]); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(best_path->errors.ContainsHighSeverityErrors()); | |
| best_path->errors.ContainsError(cert_errors::kDistrustedByTrustStore); | |
| } | |
| // Try path building when only the intermediate is blocked - should fail. | |
| result = RunPathBuilderWithDistrustedCert(test_.chain[1]); | |
| { | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_LT(result.best_result_index, result.paths.size()); | |
| const auto &best_path = result.paths[result.best_result_index]; | |
| // The built chain has length 2 since path building stopped once | |
| // it encountered the blocked certificate (intermediate). | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2u, best_path->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(best_path->certs[0], test_.chain[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(best_path->certs[1], test_.chain[1]); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(best_path->errors.ContainsHighSeverityErrors()); | |
| best_path->errors.ContainsError(cert_errors::kDistrustedByTrustStore); | |
| } | |
| // Try path building when only the root is blocked - should fail. | |
| result = RunPathBuilderWithDistrustedCert(test_.chain[2]); | |
| { | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_LT(result.best_result_index, result.paths.size()); | |
| const auto &best_path = result.paths[result.best_result_index]; | |
| // The built chain has length 3 since path building stopped once | |
| // it encountered the blocked certificate (root). | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3u, best_path->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(best_path->certs[0], test_.chain[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(best_path->certs[1], test_.chain[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(best_path->certs[2], test_.chain[2]); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(best_path->errors.ContainsHighSeverityErrors()); | |
| best_path->errors.ContainsError(cert_errors::kDistrustedByTrustStore); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // Test fixture for running the path builder over a simple chain, while varying | |
| // what CheckPathAfterVerification() does. | |
| class PathBuilderCheckPathAfterVerificationTest | |
| : public PathBuilderSimpleChainTest {}; | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderCheckPathAfterVerificationTest, NoOpToValidPath) { | |
| StrictMock<MockPathBuilderDelegate> delegate; | |
| // Just verify that the hook is called. | |
| EXPECT_CALL(delegate, CheckPathAfterVerification(_, _)); | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = RunPathBuilder(nullptr, &delegate); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| } | |
| DEFINE_CERT_ERROR_ID(kWarningFromDelegate, "Warning from delegate"); | |
| class AddWarningPathBuilderDelegate : public CertPathBuilderDelegateBase { | |
| public: | |
| void CheckPathAfterVerification(const CertPathBuilder &path_builder, | |
| CertPathBuilderResultPath *path) override { | |
| path->errors.GetErrorsForCert(1)->AddWarning(kWarningFromDelegate, nullptr); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderCheckPathAfterVerificationTest, AddsWarningToValidPath) { | |
| AddWarningPathBuilderDelegate delegate; | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = RunPathBuilder(nullptr, &delegate); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // A warning should have been added to certificate at index 1 in the path. | |
| const CertErrors *cert1_errors = | |
| result.GetBestValidPath()->errors.GetErrorsForCert(1); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(cert1_errors); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(cert1_errors->ContainsErrorWithSeverity( | |
| kWarningFromDelegate, CertError::SEVERITY_WARNING)); | |
| // The warning should not affect the VerifyError | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderCheckPathAfterVerificationTest, TestVerifyErrorMapping) { | |
| struct error_mapping { | |
| CertErrorId internal_error; | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode code; | |
| }; | |
| struct error_mapping AllErrors[] = { | |
| {cert_errors::kInternalError, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::VERIFICATION_FAILURE}, | |
| {cert_errors::kValidityFailedNotAfter, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_EXPIRED}, | |
| {cert_errors::kValidityFailedNotBefore, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_NOT_YET_VALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kDistrustedByTrustStore, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND}, | |
| {cert_errors::kSignatureAlgorithmMismatch, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kChainIsEmpty, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::VERIFICATION_FAILURE}, | |
| {cert_errors::kUnconsumedCriticalExtension, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kKeyCertSignBitNotSet, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kMaxPathLengthViolated, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND}, | |
| {cert_errors::kBasicConstraintsIndicatesNotCa, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kTargetCertShouldNotBeCa, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kMissingBasicConstraints, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kNotPermittedByNameConstraints, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kTooManyNameConstraintChecks, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kSubjectDoesNotMatchIssuer, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND}, | |
| {cert_errors::kVerifySignedDataFailed, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID_SIGNATURE}, | |
| {cert_errors::kSignatureAlgorithmsDifferentEncoding, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kEkuLacksServerAuth, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_NO_MATCHING_EKU}, | |
| {cert_errors::kEkuLacksServerAuthButHasAnyEKU, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_NO_MATCHING_EKU}, | |
| {cert_errors::kEkuLacksClientAuth, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_NO_MATCHING_EKU}, | |
| {cert_errors::kEkuLacksClientAuthButHasAnyEKU, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_NO_MATCHING_EKU}, | |
| {cert_errors::kEkuLacksClientAuthOrServerAuth, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_NO_MATCHING_EKU}, | |
| {cert_errors::kEkuHasProhibitedOCSPSigning, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kEkuHasProhibitedTimeStamping, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kEkuHasProhibitedCodeSigning, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kEkuNotPresent, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kCertIsNotTrustAnchor, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND}, | |
| {cert_errors::kNoValidPolicy, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kPolicyMappingAnyPolicy, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kFailedParsingSpki, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID}, | |
| {cert_errors::kUnacceptableSignatureAlgorithm, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_UNSUPPORTED_SIGNATURE_ALGORITHM}, | |
| {cert_errors::kUnacceptablePublicKey, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_UNSUPPORTED_KEY}, | |
| {cert_errors::kCertificateRevoked, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_REVOKED}, | |
| {cert_errors::kNoRevocationMechanism, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_NO_REVOCATION_MECHANISM}, | |
| {cert_errors::kUnableToCheckRevocation, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_UNABLE_TO_CHECK_REVOCATION}, | |
| {cert_errors::kNoIssuersFound, VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND}, | |
| {cert_errors::kDeadlineExceeded, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_DEADLINE_EXCEEDED}, | |
| {cert_errors::kIterationLimitExceeded, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_ITERATION_COUNT_EXCEEDED}, | |
| {cert_errors::kDepthLimitExceeded, | |
| VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_DEPTH_LIMIT_REACHED}, | |
| }; | |
| for (struct error_mapping mapping : AllErrors) { | |
| AddWarningPathBuilderDelegate delegate; | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = RunPathBuilder(nullptr, &delegate); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| CertErrors *errors = | |
| (CertErrors *)result.GetBestValidPath()->errors.GetErrorsForCert(1); | |
| errors->AddError(mapping.internal_error, nullptr); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), mapping.code) << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderCheckPathAfterVerificationTest, | |
| TestVerifyErrorMultipleMapping) { | |
| AddWarningPathBuilderDelegate delegate; | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = RunPathBuilder(nullptr, &delegate); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| CertErrors *errors = | |
| (CertErrors *)result.GetBestValidPath()->errors.GetErrorsForCert(1); | |
| errors->AddError(cert_errors::kEkuNotPresent, nullptr); | |
| errors->AddError(cert_errors::kNoValidPolicy, nullptr); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_MULTIPLE_ERRORS) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| DEFINE_CERT_ERROR_ID(kErrorFromDelegate, "Error from delegate"); | |
| class AddErrorPathBuilderDelegate : public CertPathBuilderDelegateBase { | |
| public: | |
| void CheckPathAfterVerification(const CertPathBuilder &path_builder, | |
| CertPathBuilderResultPath *path) override { | |
| path->errors.GetErrorsForCert(2)->AddError(kErrorFromDelegate, nullptr); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderCheckPathAfterVerificationTest, AddsErrorToValidPath) { | |
| AddErrorPathBuilderDelegate delegate; | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = RunPathBuilder(nullptr, &delegate); | |
| // Verification failed. | |
| ASSERT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_LT(result.best_result_index, result.paths.size()); | |
| const CertPathBuilderResultPath *failed_path = | |
| result.paths[result.best_result_index].get(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(failed_path); | |
| // An error should have been added to certificate at index 2 in the path. | |
| const CertErrors *cert2_errors = failed_path->errors.GetErrorsForCert(2); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(cert2_errors); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(cert2_errors->ContainsError(kErrorFromDelegate)); | |
| // The newly defined delegate error should map to CERTIFICATE_INVALID | |
| // since it is associated with a certificate (at index 2) | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::CERTIFICATE_INVALID) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| class AddOtherErrorPathBuilderDelegate : public CertPathBuilderDelegateBase { | |
| public: | |
| void CheckPathAfterVerification(const CertPathBuilder &path_builder, | |
| CertPathBuilderResultPath *path) override { | |
| path->errors.GetOtherErrors()->AddError(kErrorFromDelegate, nullptr); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderCheckPathAfterVerificationTest, AddsErrorToOtherErrors) { | |
| AddOtherErrorPathBuilderDelegate delegate; | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = RunPathBuilder(nullptr, &delegate); | |
| // Verification failed. | |
| ASSERT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_LT(result.best_result_index, result.paths.size()); | |
| const CertPathBuilderResultPath *failed_path = | |
| result.paths[result.best_result_index].get(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(failed_path); | |
| // An error should have been added to other errors | |
| const CertErrors *other_errors = failed_path->errors.GetOtherErrors(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(other_errors); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(other_errors->ContainsError(kErrorFromDelegate)); | |
| // The newly defined delegate error should map to VERIFICATION_FAILURE | |
| // since the error is not associated to a certificate. | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::VERIFICATION_FAILURE) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderCheckPathAfterVerificationTest, NoopToAlreadyInvalidPath) { | |
| StrictMock<MockPathBuilderDelegate> delegate; | |
| // Just verify that the hook is called (on an invalid path). | |
| EXPECT_CALL(delegate, CheckPathAfterVerification(_, _)); | |
| // Run the pathbuilder with certificate at index 1 actively distrusted. | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = RunPathBuilder(test_.chain[1], &delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| struct DelegateData : public CertPathBuilderDelegateData { | |
| int value = 0xB33F; | |
| }; | |
| class SetsDelegateDataPathBuilderDelegate : public CertPathBuilderDelegateBase { | |
| public: | |
| void CheckPathAfterVerification(const CertPathBuilder &path_builder, | |
| CertPathBuilderResultPath *path) override { | |
| path->delegate_data = std::make_unique<DelegateData>(); | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| TEST_F(PathBuilderCheckPathAfterVerificationTest, SetsDelegateData) { | |
| SetsDelegateDataPathBuilderDelegate delegate; | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = RunPathBuilder(nullptr, &delegate); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| DelegateData *data = reinterpret_cast<DelegateData *>( | |
| result.GetBestValidPath()->delegate_data.get()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(0xB33F, data->value); | |
| } | |
| UniquePtr<CRYPTO_BUFFER> ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(Span<const uint8_t> seed) { | |
| UniquePtr<EVP_PKEY> pkey(EVP_PKEY_from_private_seed( | |
| EVP_pkey_ml_dsa_44(), seed.data(), seed.size())); | |
| if (!pkey) { | |
| return nullptr; | |
| } | |
| ScopedCBB cbb; | |
| if (!CBB_init(cbb.get(), 0) || | |
| !EVP_marshal_public_key(cbb.get(), pkey.get())) { | |
| return nullptr; | |
| } | |
| return UniquePtr<CRYPTO_BUFFER>( | |
| CRYPTO_BUFFER_new(CBB_data(cbb.get()), CBB_len(cbb.get()), nullptr)); | |
| } | |
| class MTCCosignerNotCalledPathBuilderDelegate | |
| : public CertPathBuilderDelegateBase { | |
| public: | |
| void CheckPathAfterVerification(const CertPathBuilder &path_builder, | |
| CertPathBuilderResultPath *path) override {} | |
| std::optional<MTCCosigner> GetMTCCosigner( | |
| Span<const uint8_t> cosigner_id) override { | |
| ADD_FAILURE(); | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| } | |
| MOCK_METHOD(bool, | |
| IsCosignatureVerificationResultAcceptable, | |
| (const MTCAnchor* mtc_anchor, | |
| std::vector<std::vector<uint8_t>> valid_additional_cosigners), | |
| (override)); | |
| }; | |
| class MtcCosignersPathBuilderDelegate : public CertPathBuilderDelegateBase { | |
| public: | |
| MtcCosignersPathBuilderDelegate() = default; | |
| explicit MtcCosignersPathBuilderDelegate( | |
| std::map<std::vector<uint8_t>, MTCCosigner> cosigners) | |
| : cosigners_(std::move(cosigners)) {} | |
| void CheckPathAfterVerification(const CertPathBuilder &path_builder, | |
| CertPathBuilderResultPath *path) override {} | |
| std::optional<MTCCosigner> GetMTCCosigner( | |
| Span<const uint8_t> cosigner_id) override { | |
| // Constructing a vector just to do the lookup is inefficient, but this is | |
| // just test code so it's fine. | |
| std::vector<uint8_t> id_as_vector(cosigner_id.begin(), cosigner_id.end()); | |
| auto it = cosigners_.find(id_as_vector); | |
| if (it != cosigners_.end()) { | |
| return MTCCosigner{it->second.signature_algorithm, UpRef(it->second.key)}; | |
| } | |
| return std::nullopt; | |
| } | |
| MOCK_METHOD(bool, | |
| IsCosignatureVerificationResultAcceptable, | |
| (const MTCAnchor* mtc_anchor, | |
| std::vector<std::vector<uint8_t>> valid_additional_cosigners), | |
| (override)); | |
| private: | |
| std::map<std::vector<uint8_t>, MTCCosigner> cosigners_; | |
| }; | |
| class PathBuilderMTCTest | |
| : public PathBuilderSimpleChainTest, | |
| public ::testing::WithParamInterface<MTCAnchor::MtcSpecVersion> { | |
| public: | |
| PathBuilderMTCTest() = default; | |
| protected: | |
| MTCAnchor::MtcSpecVersion spec_version() const { return GetParam(); } | |
| std::string TestDataDir() const { | |
| switch (spec_version()) { | |
| case MTCAnchor::kPlants04: | |
| return "mtc_plants04/"; | |
| case MTCAnchor::kPlants07: | |
| return "mtc_plants07/"; | |
| } | |
| abort(); | |
| } | |
| std::string_view ExpectedSubtreeHashBase64() const { | |
| switch (spec_version()) { | |
| case MTCAnchor::kPlants04: | |
| return "ir6iVcgTrbuHdXB3lKGny6VKSlE1OB5Q+LrtdFH+qIE="; | |
| case MTCAnchor::kPlants07: | |
| return "K/o/0tKQMz/Qdk+F3U9ViXjhYBCgb675l9vH7atcQxQ="; | |
| } | |
| abort(); | |
| } | |
| std::shared_ptr<const MTCAnchor> CreateMTCAnchor( | |
| Span<const uint8_t> ca_id, SignatureAlgorithm ca_signature_algorithm, | |
| UniquePtr<CRYPTO_BUFFER> ca_key, | |
| std::vector<LogTrustedSubtrees> log_trusted_subtrees) const { | |
| switch (spec_version()) { | |
| case MTCAnchor::kPlants04: | |
| return std::make_shared<MTCAnchor>(ca_id, ca_signature_algorithm, | |
| std::move(ca_key), | |
| std::move(log_trusted_subtrees)); | |
| case MTCAnchor::kPlants07: | |
| return MTCAnchor::CreatePlants07(ca_id, ca_signature_algorithm, | |
| std::move(ca_key), | |
| std::move(log_trusted_subtrees)); | |
| } | |
| abort(); | |
| } | |
| ::testing::AssertionResult ReadMTCTestCert( | |
| const std::string &file_name, | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> *result) const { | |
| return ReadTestCert(TestDataDir() + file_name, result); | |
| } | |
| void SetUp() override { | |
| PathBuilderSimpleChainTest::SetUp(); | |
| // Set up the MTCAnchor. | |
| std::string subtree_hash; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE( | |
| string_util::Base64Decode(ExpectedSubtreeHashBase64(), &subtree_hash)); | |
| TrustedSubtree subtree; | |
| ASSERT_EQ(subtree_hash.size(), subtree.hash.size()); | |
| memcpy(subtree.hash.data(), subtree_hash.data(), subtree_hash.size()); | |
| subtree.range.start = 0; | |
| subtree.range.end = 10; | |
| std::vector<LogTrustedSubtrees> subtrees = { | |
| {1, {std::move(subtree)}}, | |
| }; | |
| TrustedSubtree subtree2; | |
| subtree2.range.start = 0; | |
| subtree2.range.end = 10; | |
| subtree2.hash.fill(1); | |
| std::vector<LogTrustedSubtrees> subtrees2 = { | |
| {1, {std::move(subtree2)}}, | |
| }; | |
| static constexpr uint8_t kCaId[] = {0x81, 0xfd, 0x59, 0x01}; | |
| // With ml-dsa it is much more compact to encode the private key seed and | |
| // derive the public key from that. | |
| static constexpr uint8_t kCaPrivateKeySeed[] = { | |
| 0x00, 0x01, 0x02, 0x03, 0x04, 0x05, 0x06, 0x07, 0x08, 0x09, 0x0a, | |
| 0x0b, 0x0c, 0x0d, 0x0e, 0x0f, 0x10, 0x11, 0x12, 0x13, 0x14, 0x15, | |
| 0x16, 0x17, 0x18, 0x19, 0x1a, 0x1b, 0x1c, 0x1d, 0x1e, 0x1f}; | |
| UniquePtr<CRYPTO_BUFFER> spki = ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCaPrivateKeySeed); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(spki); | |
| static constexpr uint8_t kCaPrivateKeySeed2[32] = {0x00}; | |
| UniquePtr<CRYPTO_BUFFER> spki2 = | |
| ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCaPrivateKeySeed2); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(spki2); | |
| mtc_anchor_ = CreateMTCAnchor(MakeSpan(kCaId), SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| UpRef(spki), subtrees); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(mtc_anchor_); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(mtc_anchor_->spec_version(), spec_version()); | |
| mtc_anchor_wrong_key_ = CreateMTCAnchor( | |
| MakeSpan(kCaId), SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, UpRef(spki2), subtrees); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(mtc_anchor_wrong_key_); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(mtc_anchor_wrong_key_->spec_version(), spec_version()); | |
| mtc_anchor_wrong_subtree_hash_ = CreateMTCAnchor( | |
| MakeSpan(kCaId), SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, UpRef(spki), subtrees2); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(mtc_anchor_wrong_subtree_hash_); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(mtc_anchor_wrong_subtree_hash_->spec_version(), spec_version()); | |
| mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_ = | |
| CreateMTCAnchor(MakeSpan(kCaId), SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| UpRef(spki), std::vector<LogTrustedSubtrees>()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_->spec_version(), spec_version()); | |
| mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_wrong_key_ = | |
| CreateMTCAnchor(MakeSpan(kCaId), SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| UpRef(spki2), std::vector<LogTrustedSubtrees>()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_wrong_key_); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_wrong_key_->spec_version(), | |
| spec_version()); | |
| } | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result RunPathBuilder( | |
| const std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> &leaf, | |
| TrustStoreInMemory *trust_store, CertIssuerSource *intermediates, | |
| CertPathBuilderDelegate *delegate) { | |
| SimplePathBuilderDelegate default_delegate( | |
| 2048, SimplePathBuilderDelegate::DigestPolicy::kStrong); | |
| if (!delegate) { | |
| delegate = &default_delegate; | |
| } | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| leaf, trust_store, delegate, leaf->tbs().validity_not_before, | |
| KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, InitialExplicitPolicy::kFalse, | |
| {der::Input(kAnyPolicyOid)}, InitialPolicyMappingInhibit::kFalse, | |
| InitialAnyPolicyInhibit::kFalse); | |
| if (intermediates) { | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(intermediates); | |
| } | |
| return path_builder.Run(); | |
| } | |
| std::shared_ptr<const MTCAnchor> mtc_anchor_; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const MTCAnchor> mtc_anchor_wrong_key_; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const MTCAnchor> mtc_anchor_wrong_subtree_hash_; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const MTCAnchor> mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const MTCAnchor> mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_wrong_key_; | |
| }; | |
| INSTANTIATE_TEST_SUITE_P( | |
| All, PathBuilderMTCTest, | |
| ::testing::Values(MTCAnchor::kPlants04, MTCAnchor::kPlants07), | |
| [](const testing::TestParamInfo<MTCAnchor::MtcSpecVersion> ¶m_info) { | |
| switch (param_info.param) { | |
| case MTCAnchor::kPlants04: | |
| return "Plants04"; | |
| case MTCAnchor::kPlants07: | |
| return "Plants07"; | |
| } | |
| abort(); | |
| }); | |
| TEST_P(PathBuilderMTCTest, Verification) { | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> signatureless_leaf; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadMTCTestCert("mtc-leaf.pem", &signatureless_leaf)); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> standalone_leaf; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadMTCTestCert("mtc-leaf-standalone.pem", &standalone_leaf)); | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store_with_subtrees; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(trust_store_with_subtrees.AddMTCTrustAnchor(mtc_anchor_)); | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store_with_subtrees_wrong_key; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(trust_store_with_subtrees_wrong_key.AddMTCTrustAnchor( | |
| mtc_anchor_wrong_key_)); | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store_wrong_subtreehash; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(trust_store_wrong_subtreehash.AddMTCTrustAnchor( | |
| mtc_anchor_wrong_subtree_hash_)); | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store_no_subtrees; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE( | |
| trust_store_no_subtrees.AddMTCTrustAnchor(mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_)); | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store_no_subtrees_wrong_key; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(trust_store_no_subtrees_wrong_key.AddMTCTrustAnchor( | |
| mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_wrong_key_)); | |
| MTCCosignerNotCalledPathBuilderDelegate mtc_cosigner_not_called_delegate; | |
| StrictMock<MtcCosignersPathBuilderDelegate> no_cosigners_delegate; | |
| EXPECT_CALL(no_cosigners_delegate, | |
| IsCosignatureVerificationResultAcceptable( | |
| mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_.get(), ElementsAre())) | |
| .WillRepeatedly(Return(true)); | |
| // Signatureless cert should be valid when verified against the anchor | |
| // configured with subtrees (regardless of what key the anchor is configured | |
| // with, no cosignatures should be checked). | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(signatureless_leaf, &trust_store_with_subtrees, nullptr, | |
| &mtc_cosigner_not_called_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(signatureless_leaf, &trust_store_with_subtrees_wrong_key, | |
| nullptr, &mtc_cosigner_not_called_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // Signatureless cert should fail when verified against either anchor without | |
| // subtrees. | |
| result = RunPathBuilder(signatureless_leaf, &trust_store_no_subtrees, nullptr, | |
| &mtc_cosigner_not_called_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kMtcLandmarkNotRecognized)); | |
| result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(signatureless_leaf, &trust_store_no_subtrees_wrong_key, | |
| nullptr, &mtc_cosigner_not_called_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kMtcLandmarkNotRecognized)); | |
| // Standalone cert should be valid when verified against the anchor | |
| // configured with subtrees (regardless of what key the anchor is configured | |
| // with). | |
| result = RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf, &trust_store_with_subtrees, nullptr, | |
| &mtc_cosigner_not_called_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| result = RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf, &trust_store_with_subtrees_wrong_key, | |
| nullptr, &mtc_cosigner_not_called_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // Standalone should be valid when verified against the anchor without | |
| // subtrees only if it has the correct key. | |
| result = RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf, &trust_store_no_subtrees, nullptr, | |
| &no_cosigners_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| result = RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf, &trust_store_no_subtrees_wrong_key, | |
| nullptr, &no_cosigners_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kVerifySignedDataFailed)); | |
| // Both certs should fail when verified against the anchor with wrong subtree | |
| // hash. | |
| result = RunPathBuilder(signatureless_leaf, &trust_store_wrong_subtreehash, | |
| nullptr, &mtc_cosigner_not_called_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kVerifySignedDataFailed)); | |
| result = RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf, &trust_store_wrong_subtreehash, | |
| nullptr, &mtc_cosigner_not_called_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kVerifySignedDataFailed)); | |
| // Cert with multiple cosigners (including valid CA cosigner) should validate | |
| // successfully, ignoring the unknown cosigners. | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> standalone_leaf_3_cosigners; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadMTCTestCert("mtc-leaf-standalone-3cosigners.pem", | |
| &standalone_leaf_3_cosigners)); | |
| result = RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf_3_cosigners, &trust_store_no_subtrees, | |
| nullptr, &no_cosigners_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // but it should fail if the CA key is wrong: | |
| result = RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf_3_cosigners, | |
| &trust_store_no_subtrees_wrong_key, nullptr, | |
| &no_cosigners_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kVerifySignedDataFailed)); | |
| // Cert with a cosigner but no CA cosigner should fail: | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> standalone_leaf_no_ca_signer; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadMTCTestCert("mtc-leaf-standalone-no_ca_signer.pem", | |
| &standalone_leaf_no_ca_signer)); | |
| result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf_no_ca_signer, &trust_store_no_subtrees, | |
| nullptr, &no_cosigners_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kVerifySignedDataFailed)); | |
| // Cert with a duplicate CA cosigner should fail: | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> standalone_leaf_duplicate_ca_signer; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadMTCTestCert("mtc-leaf-standalone-duplicate_ca_signer.pem", | |
| &standalone_leaf_duplicate_ca_signer)); | |
| result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf_duplicate_ca_signer, | |
| &trust_store_no_subtrees, nullptr, &no_cosigners_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kVerifySignedDataFailed)); | |
| // Cert with a cosigners in non-sorted order should fail: | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> standalone_leaf_cosigner_wrong_order; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadMTCTestCert("mtc-leaf-standalone-cosigner_wrong_order.pem", | |
| &standalone_leaf_cosigner_wrong_order)); | |
| result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf_cosigner_wrong_order, | |
| &trust_store_no_subtrees, nullptr, &no_cosigners_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kVerifySignedDataFailed)); | |
| } | |
| TEST_P(PathBuilderMTCTest, CosignatureVerification) { | |
| static constexpr uint8_t kCosignerId1[] = {0x81, 0xfd, 0x59, 0x00}; | |
| static constexpr uint8_t kCosignerPrivateKeySeed1[] = { | |
| 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, | |
| 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xa1, 0x11, 0x11, 0x11, 0x11, | |
| 0x11, 0x11, 0x11, 0x11, 0x11, 0x11, 0x11, 0x11, 0x11, 0x11}; | |
| static constexpr uint8_t kCosignerId2[] = {0x81, 0xfd, 0x59, 0x02}; | |
| static constexpr uint8_t kCosignerPrivateKeySeed2[] = { | |
| 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, | |
| 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0xaa, 0x22, 0x22, 0x22, 0x22, 0x22, 0x22, | |
| 0x22, 0x22, 0x22, 0x22, 0x22, 0x22, 0x22, 0x22, 0x22, 0x22}; | |
| std::vector<uint8_t> cosigner_id_1(kCosignerId1, | |
| kCosignerId1 + sizeof(kCosignerId1)); | |
| std::vector<uint8_t> cosigner_id_2(kCosignerId2, | |
| kCosignerId2 + sizeof(kCosignerId2)); | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store_no_subtrees; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE( | |
| trust_store_no_subtrees.AddMTCTrustAnchor(mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_)); | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store_no_subtrees_wrong_key; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(trust_store_no_subtrees_wrong_key.AddMTCTrustAnchor( | |
| mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_wrong_key_)); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> standalone_leaf_3_cosigners; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadMTCTestCert("mtc-leaf-standalone-3cosigners.pem", | |
| &standalone_leaf_3_cosigners)); | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result; | |
| { | |
| std::map<std::vector<uint8_t>, VerifyCertificateChainDelegate::MTCCosigner> | |
| cosigners; | |
| cosigners[cosigner_id_1] = { | |
| SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCosignerPrivateKeySeed1)}; | |
| cosigners[cosigner_id_2] = { | |
| SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCosignerPrivateKeySeed2)}; | |
| StrictMock<MtcCosignersPathBuilderDelegate> cosigners_delegate( | |
| std::move(cosigners)); | |
| // Cert with multiple valid cosigners should validate successfully, and | |
| // return the valid cosigner ids. | |
| EXPECT_CALL(cosigners_delegate, | |
| IsCosignatureVerificationResultAcceptable( | |
| mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_.get(), | |
| ElementsAre(cosigner_id_1, cosigner_id_2))) | |
| .WillOnce(Return(true)); | |
| result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf_3_cosigners, &trust_store_no_subtrees, | |
| nullptr, &cosigners_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| } | |
| { | |
| std::map<std::vector<uint8_t>, VerifyCertificateChainDelegate::MTCCosigner> | |
| cosigners; | |
| cosigners[cosigner_id_1] = { | |
| SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCosignerPrivateKeySeed1)}; | |
| cosigners[cosigner_id_2] = { | |
| SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCosignerPrivateKeySeed2)}; | |
| StrictMock<MtcCosignersPathBuilderDelegate> cosigners_delegate( | |
| std::move(cosigners)); | |
| // If the CA key is wrong it should fail and | |
| // IsCosignatureVerificationResultAcceptable should not be called. | |
| result = RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf_3_cosigners, | |
| &trust_store_no_subtrees_wrong_key, nullptr, | |
| &cosigners_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kVerifySignedDataFailed)); | |
| } | |
| { | |
| std::map<std::vector<uint8_t>, VerifyCertificateChainDelegate::MTCCosigner> | |
| wrong_cosigners; | |
| wrong_cosigners[cosigner_id_1] = { | |
| SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCosignerPrivateKeySeed2)}; | |
| wrong_cosigners[cosigner_id_2] = { | |
| SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCosignerPrivateKeySeed1)}; | |
| StrictMock<MtcCosignersPathBuilderDelegate> wrong_cosigner_keys_delegate( | |
| std::move(wrong_cosigners)); | |
| // If the CA key is correct but the cosigners fail to validate, it should | |
| // be called with empty valid cosigners list: | |
| EXPECT_CALL(wrong_cosigner_keys_delegate, | |
| IsCosignatureVerificationResultAcceptable( | |
| mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_.get(), ElementsAre())) | |
| .WillOnce(Return(true)); | |
| result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf_3_cosigners, &trust_store_no_subtrees, | |
| nullptr, &wrong_cosigner_keys_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| } | |
| { | |
| std::map<std::vector<uint8_t>, VerifyCertificateChainDelegate::MTCCosigner> | |
| wrong_ca1_cosigners; | |
| wrong_ca1_cosigners[cosigner_id_1] = { | |
| SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCosignerPrivateKeySeed2)}; | |
| wrong_ca1_cosigners[cosigner_id_2] = { | |
| SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCosignerPrivateKeySeed2)}; | |
| StrictMock<MtcCosignersPathBuilderDelegate> wrong_ca1_cosigner_key_delegate( | |
| std::move(wrong_ca1_cosigners)); | |
| // If the CA key is correct but one of the cosigners fail to validate and | |
| // one succeeded, it should be called with the valid one in the cosigners | |
| // list: | |
| EXPECT_CALL(wrong_ca1_cosigner_key_delegate, | |
| IsCosignatureVerificationResultAcceptable( | |
| mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_.get(), ElementsAre(cosigner_id_2))) | |
| .WillOnce(Return(true)); | |
| result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf_3_cosigners, &trust_store_no_subtrees, | |
| nullptr, &wrong_ca1_cosigner_key_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| } | |
| { | |
| std::map<std::vector<uint8_t>, VerifyCertificateChainDelegate::MTCCosigner> | |
| cosigners; | |
| cosigners[cosigner_id_1] = { | |
| SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCosignerPrivateKeySeed1)}; | |
| cosigners[cosigner_id_2] = { | |
| SignatureAlgorithm::kMldsa44, | |
| ExportPublicKeyFromSeed(kCosignerPrivateKeySeed2)}; | |
| StrictMock<MtcCosignersPathBuilderDelegate> rejecting_delegate( | |
| std::move(cosigners)); | |
| // Even with valid cosigners, if the delegate rejects the result, it should | |
| // fail. | |
| EXPECT_CALL(rejecting_delegate, | |
| IsCosignatureVerificationResultAcceptable( | |
| mtc_anchor_no_subtrees_.get(), | |
| ElementsAre(cosigner_id_1, cosigner_id_2))) | |
| .WillOnce(Return(false)); | |
| result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(standalone_leaf_3_cosigners, &trust_store_no_subtrees, | |
| nullptr, &rejecting_delegate); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid()->errors.ContainsError( | |
| cert_errors::kMtcUnacceptableCosignatureVerificationResult)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| TEST_P(PathBuilderMTCTest, CheckPathAfterVerification) { | |
| // Set up MTC leaf and its trust anchor. | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> mtc_leaf; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadMTCTestCert("mtc-leaf.pem", &mtc_leaf)); | |
| TrustStoreInMemory in_memory; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(in_memory.AddMTCTrustAnchor(mtc_anchor_)); | |
| // Check that the path is valid with no delegate. | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(mtc_leaf, &in_memory, nullptr, nullptr); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| // Check that verification fails when the delegate adds an error. | |
| AddOtherErrorPathBuilderDelegate delegate; | |
| result = RunPathBuilder(mtc_leaf, &in_memory, nullptr, &delegate); | |
| ASSERT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_LT(result.best_result_index, result.paths.size()); | |
| const CertPathBuilderResultPath *failed_path = | |
| result.paths[result.best_result_index].get(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(failed_path); | |
| // An error should have been added to other errors | |
| const CertErrors *other_errors = failed_path->errors.GetOtherErrors(); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(other_errors); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(other_errors->ContainsError(kErrorFromDelegate)); | |
| // The newly defined delegate error should map to VERIFICATION_FAILURE | |
| // since the error is not associated to a certificate. | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::VERIFICATION_FAILURE) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| } | |
| TEST_P(PathBuilderMTCTest, PathLength) { | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> leaf; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadMTCTestCert("leaf.pem", &leaf)); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> ica; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(ReadMTCTestCert("mtc-ica.pem", &ica)); | |
| // Test that verifying leaf succeeds using ica as the trusted root. | |
| { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory in_memory; | |
| in_memory.AddTrustAnchor(ica); | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(leaf, &in_memory, nullptr, nullptr); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| } | |
| // Test that verifying ica (as a leaf) succeeds using the MTC trust anchor. | |
| { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory in_memory; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(in_memory.AddMTCTrustAnchor(mtc_anchor_)); | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(ica, &in_memory, nullptr, nullptr); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| } | |
| // Test that verifying leaf fails when using the MTC trust anchor. | |
| { | |
| TrustStoreInMemory in_memory; | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(in_memory.AddMTCTrustAnchor(mtc_anchor_)); | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic intermediates; | |
| intermediates.AddCert(ica); | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = | |
| RunPathBuilder(leaf, &in_memory, &intermediates, nullptr); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| const auto &path = *result.GetBestPathPossiblyInvalid(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3u, path.certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(leaf, path.certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(ica, path.certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(mtc_anchor_->AsCert(), path.certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(path.errors.ContainsError(cert_errors::kMaxPathLengthViolated)); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| TEST(PathBuilderPrioritizationTest, DatePrioritization) { | |
| std::string test_dir = | |
| "testdata/path_builder_unittest/validity_date_prioritization/"; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> root = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "root.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(root); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_ac = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_ac.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_ac); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_ad = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_ad.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_ad); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_bc = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_bc.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_bc); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_bd = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_bd.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_bd); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> target = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "target.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(target); | |
| SimplePathBuilderDelegate delegate( | |
| 1024, SimplePathBuilderDelegate::DigestPolicy::kWeakAllowSha1); | |
| der::GeneralizedTime verify_time = {2017, 3, 1, 0, 0, 0}; | |
| // Distrust the root certificate. This will force the path builder to attempt | |
| // all possible paths. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(root); | |
| for (bool reverse_input_order : {false, true}) { | |
| SCOPED_TRACE(reverse_input_order); | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic intermediates; | |
| // Test with the intermediates supplied in two different orders to ensure | |
| // the results don't depend on input ordering. | |
| if (reverse_input_order) { | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_bd); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_bc); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_ad); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_ac); | |
| } else { | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_ac); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_ad); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_bc); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_bd); | |
| } | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target, &trust_store, &delegate, verify_time, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| InitialExplicitPolicy::kFalse, {der::Input(kAnyPolicyOid)}, | |
| InitialPolicyMappingInhibit::kFalse, InitialAnyPolicyInhibit::kFalse); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&intermediates); | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(4U, result.paths.size()); | |
| // Path builder should have attempted paths using the intermediates in | |
| // order: bd, bc, ad, ac | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_bd, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[0]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[1]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[1]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_bc, result.paths[1]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[1]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[2]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[2]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[2]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_ad, result.paths[2]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[2]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[3]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[3]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[3]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_ac, result.paths[3]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[3]->certs[2]); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| TEST(PathBuilderPrioritizationTest, KeyIdPrioritization) { | |
| std::string test_dir = | |
| "testdata/path_builder_unittest/key_id_prioritization/"; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> root = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "root.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(root); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_matching_ski_a = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_matching_ski_a.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_matching_ski_a); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_matching_ski_b = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_matching_ski_b.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_matching_ski_b); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_no_ski_a = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_no_ski_a.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_no_ski_a); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_no_ski_b = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_no_ski_b.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_no_ski_b); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_different_ski_a = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_different_ski_a.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_different_ski_a); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_different_ski_b = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_different_ski_b.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_different_ski_b); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> target = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "target.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(target); | |
| SimplePathBuilderDelegate delegate( | |
| 1024, SimplePathBuilderDelegate::DigestPolicy::kWeakAllowSha1); | |
| der::GeneralizedTime verify_time = {2017, 3, 1, 0, 0, 0}; | |
| // Distrust the root certificate. This will force the path builder to attempt | |
| // all possible paths. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(root); | |
| for (bool reverse_input_order : {false, true}) { | |
| SCOPED_TRACE(reverse_input_order); | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic intermediates; | |
| // Test with the intermediates supplied in two different orders to ensure | |
| // the results don't depend on input ordering. | |
| if (reverse_input_order) { | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_different_ski_b); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_different_ski_a); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_no_ski_b); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_no_ski_a); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_matching_ski_b); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_matching_ski_a); | |
| } else { | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_matching_ski_a); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_matching_ski_b); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_no_ski_a); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_no_ski_b); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_different_ski_a); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_different_ski_b); | |
| } | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target, &trust_store, &delegate, verify_time, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| InitialExplicitPolicy::kFalse, {der::Input(kAnyPolicyOid)}, | |
| InitialPolicyMappingInhibit::kFalse, InitialAnyPolicyInhibit::kFalse); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&intermediates); | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(6U, result.paths.size()); | |
| // Path builder should have attempted paths using the intermediates in | |
| // order: matching_ski_b, matching_ski_a, no_ski_b, no_ski_a, | |
| // different_ski_b, different_ski_a | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_matching_ski_b, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[0]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[1]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[1]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_matching_ski_a, result.paths[1]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[1]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[2]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[2]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[2]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_no_ski_b, result.paths[2]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[2]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[3]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[3]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[3]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_no_ski_a, result.paths[3]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[3]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[4]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[4]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[4]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_different_ski_b, result.paths[4]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[4]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[5]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[5]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[5]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_different_ski_a, result.paths[5]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[5]->certs[2]); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| TEST(PathBuilderPrioritizationTest, TrustAndKeyIdPrioritization) { | |
| std::string test_dir = | |
| "testdata/path_builder_unittest/key_id_prioritization/"; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> root = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "root.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(root); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> trusted_and_matching = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_matching_ski_a.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(trusted_and_matching); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> matching = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_matching_ski_b.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(matching); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> distrusted_and_matching = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_matching_ski_c.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(distrusted_and_matching); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> trusted_and_no_match_data = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_no_ski_a.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(trusted_and_no_match_data); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> no_match_data = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_no_ski_b.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(no_match_data); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> distrusted_and_no_match_data = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_no_ski_c.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(distrusted_and_no_match_data); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> trusted_and_mismatch = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_different_ski_a.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(trusted_and_mismatch); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> mismatch = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_different_ski_b.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(mismatch); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> distrusted_and_mismatch = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_different_ski_c.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(distrusted_and_mismatch); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> target = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "target.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(target); | |
| SimplePathBuilderDelegate delegate( | |
| 1024, SimplePathBuilderDelegate::DigestPolicy::kWeakAllowSha1); | |
| der::GeneralizedTime verify_time = {2017, 3, 1, 0, 0, 0}; | |
| for (bool reverse_input_order : {false, true}) { | |
| SCOPED_TRACE(reverse_input_order); | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| // Test with the intermediates supplied in two different orders to ensure | |
| // the results don't depend on input ordering. | |
| if (reverse_input_order) { | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(trusted_and_matching); | |
| trust_store.AddCertificateWithUnspecifiedTrust(matching); | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(distrusted_and_matching); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(trusted_and_no_match_data); | |
| trust_store.AddCertificateWithUnspecifiedTrust(no_match_data); | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(distrusted_and_no_match_data); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(trusted_and_mismatch); | |
| trust_store.AddCertificateWithUnspecifiedTrust(mismatch); | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(distrusted_and_mismatch); | |
| } else { | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(distrusted_and_matching); | |
| trust_store.AddCertificateWithUnspecifiedTrust(no_match_data); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(trusted_and_no_match_data); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(trusted_and_matching); | |
| trust_store.AddCertificateWithUnspecifiedTrust(matching); | |
| trust_store.AddCertificateWithUnspecifiedTrust(mismatch); | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(distrusted_and_no_match_data); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(trusted_and_mismatch); | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(distrusted_and_mismatch); | |
| } | |
| // Also distrust the root certificate. This will force the path builder to | |
| // report paths that included an unspecified trust intermediate. | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(root); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target, &trust_store, &delegate, verify_time, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| InitialExplicitPolicy::kFalse, {der::Input(kAnyPolicyOid)}, | |
| InitialPolicyMappingInhibit::kFalse, InitialAnyPolicyInhibit::kFalse); | |
| path_builder.SetValidPathLimit(0); | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(9U, result.paths.size()); | |
| // Path builder should have attempted paths using the intermediates in | |
| // order: trusted_and_matching, trusted_and_no_match_data, matching, | |
| // no_match_data, trusted_and_mismatch, mismatch, distrusted_and_matching, | |
| // distrusted_and_no_match_data, distrusted_and_mismatch. | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(trusted_and_matching, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths[1]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[1]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(trusted_and_no_match_data, result.paths[1]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[2]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[2]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[2]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(matching, result.paths[2]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[2]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[3]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[3]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[3]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(no_match_data, result.paths[3]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[3]->certs[2]); | |
| // Although this intermediate is trusted, it has the wrong key, so | |
| // the path should not be valid. | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[4]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths[4]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[4]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(trusted_and_mismatch, result.paths[4]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[5]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[5]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[5]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(mismatch, result.paths[5]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[5]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[6]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths[6]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[6]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(distrusted_and_matching, result.paths[6]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[7]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths[7]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[7]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(distrusted_and_no_match_data, result.paths[7]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[8]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths[8]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[8]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(distrusted_and_mismatch, result.paths[8]->certs[1]); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| // PathBuilder does not support prioritization based on the issuer name & | |
| // serial in authorityKeyIdentifier, so this test just ensures that it does not | |
| // affect prioritization order and that it is generally just ignored | |
| // completely. | |
| TEST(PathBuilderPrioritizationTest, KeyIdNameAndSerialPrioritization) { | |
| std::string test_dir = | |
| "testdata/path_builder_unittest/key_id_name_and_serial_prioritization/"; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> root = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "root.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(root); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> root2 = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "root2.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(root2); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_matching = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_matching.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_matching); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_match_name_only = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_match_name_only.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_match_name_only); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> int_mismatch = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "int_mismatch.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(int_mismatch); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> target = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "target.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(target); | |
| SimplePathBuilderDelegate delegate( | |
| 1024, SimplePathBuilderDelegate::DigestPolicy::kWeakAllowSha1); | |
| der::GeneralizedTime verify_time = {2017, 3, 1, 0, 0, 0}; | |
| // Distrust the root certificates. This will force the path builder to attempt | |
| // all possible paths. | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(root); | |
| trust_store.AddDistrustedCertificateForTest(root2); | |
| for (bool reverse_input_order : {false, true}) { | |
| SCOPED_TRACE(reverse_input_order); | |
| CertIssuerSourceStatic intermediates; | |
| // Test with the intermediates supplied in two different orders to ensure | |
| // the results don't depend on input ordering. | |
| if (reverse_input_order) { | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_mismatch); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_match_name_only); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_matching); | |
| } else { | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_matching); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_match_name_only); | |
| intermediates.AddCert(int_mismatch); | |
| } | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target, &trust_store, &delegate, verify_time, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| InitialExplicitPolicy::kFalse, {der::Input(kAnyPolicyOid)}, | |
| InitialPolicyMappingInhibit::kFalse, InitialAnyPolicyInhibit::kFalse); | |
| path_builder.AddCertIssuerSource(&intermediates); | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths.size()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_NOT_FOUND) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| // The serial & issuer method is not used in prioritization, so the certs | |
| // should have been prioritized based on dates. The test certs have the | |
| // date priority order in the reverse of what authorityKeyIdentifier | |
| // prioritization would have done if it were supported. | |
| // Path builder should have attempted paths using the intermediates in | |
| // order: mismatch, match_name_only, matching | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_mismatch, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root2, result.paths[0]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[1]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[1]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_match_name_only, result.paths[1]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[1]->certs[2]); | |
| EXPECT_FALSE(result.paths[2]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(3U, result.paths[2]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[2]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(int_matching, result.paths[2]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root, result.paths[2]->certs[2]); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| TEST(PathBuilderPrioritizationTest, SelfIssuedPrioritization) { | |
| std::string test_dir = | |
| "testdata/path_builder_unittest/self_issued_prioritization/"; | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> root1 = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "root1.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(root1); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> root1_cross = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "root1_cross.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(root1_cross); | |
| std::shared_ptr<const ParsedCertificate> target = | |
| ReadCertFromFile(test_dir + "target.pem"); | |
| ASSERT_TRUE(target); | |
| SimplePathBuilderDelegate delegate( | |
| 1024, SimplePathBuilderDelegate::DigestPolicy::kWeakAllowSha1); | |
| der::GeneralizedTime verify_time = {2017, 3, 1, 0, 0, 0}; | |
| TrustStoreInMemory trust_store; | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(root1); | |
| trust_store.AddTrustAnchor(root1_cross); | |
| CertPathBuilder path_builder( | |
| target, &trust_store, &delegate, verify_time, KeyPurpose::ANY_EKU, | |
| InitialExplicitPolicy::kFalse, {der::Input(kAnyPolicyOid)}, | |
| InitialPolicyMappingInhibit::kFalse, InitialAnyPolicyInhibit::kFalse); | |
| path_builder.SetValidPathLimit(0); | |
| CertPathBuilder::Result result = path_builder.Run(); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.HasValidPath()); | |
| VerifyError error = result.GetBestPathVerifyError(); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(error.Code(), VerifyError::StatusCode::PATH_VERIFIED) | |
| << error.DiagnosticString(); | |
| // Path builder should have built paths to both trusted roots. | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths.size()); | |
| // `root1` should have been preferred because it is self-issued, even though | |
| // the notBefore date is older than `root1_cross`. | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[0]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths[0]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[0]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root1, result.paths[0]->certs[1]); | |
| EXPECT_TRUE(result.paths[1]->IsValid()); | |
| ASSERT_EQ(2U, result.paths[1]->certs.size()); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(target, result.paths[1]->certs[0]); | |
| EXPECT_EQ(root1_cross, result.paths[1]->certs[1]); | |
| } | |
| } // namespace | |
| BSSL_NAMESPACE_END |