Skip ASN.1 template tests in Windows shared library builds.

This should fix the Chromium roll.

Windows shared library builds are fussy about dllexport vs. dllimport in
a way that's incompatible with external uses of the asn1t.h macros. The
issue is the DECLARE_* macros will add dllexport vs. dllimport on the
assumption the symbols are defined in libcrypto, but external
definitions need a different selector.

Rather than add more complex macros for this, just exclude those tests.
Ideally we wouldn't supoport asn1t.h outside the library at all, if we
can manage it, so no sense in trying to make it work.

This excludes both the new and the old tests. Although this has been
working thus far, it only works because we've been setting the
BORINGSSL_IMPLEMENTATION symbol for test targets wrong in Chromium. I'm
confused how that's been working at all (maybe dllexport vs. dllimport
is more lax when it comes to functions rather than variables?), but when
I do it correctly, the ASN1_LINKED_LIST template breaks too.

Change-Id: I391edba1748f66c383ed55a9d23053674bbb876e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/44484
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
1 file changed
tree: 8619aaea6c5a1cae4ac8f5404b1efe82a50e5f98
  1. .github/
  2. crypto/
  3. decrepit/
  4. fuzz/
  5. include/
  6. ssl/
  7. third_party/
  8. tool/
  9. util/
  10. .clang-format
  11. .gitignore
  12. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  13. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  14. BUILDING.md
  15. CMakeLists.txt
  16. codereview.settings
  17. CONTRIBUTING.md
  18. FUZZING.md
  19. go.mod
  20. go.sum
  21. INCORPORATING.md
  22. LICENSE
  23. PORTING.md
  24. README.md
  25. SANDBOXING.md
  26. sources.cmake
  27. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: