| // Copyright 2022 The BoringSSL Authors |
| // |
| // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); |
| // you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. |
| // You may obtain a copy of the License at |
| // |
| // https://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0 |
| // |
| // Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software |
| // distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS, |
| // WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. |
| // See the License for the specific language governing permissions and |
| // limitations under the License. |
| |
| #include <openssl/base.h> |
| #include <openssl/x509.h> |
| |
| #include <assert.h> |
| |
| #include <algorithm> |
| #include <optional> |
| #include <utility> |
| |
| #include <openssl/mem.h> |
| #include <openssl/obj.h> |
| #include <openssl/span.h> |
| #include <openssl/stack.h> |
| |
| #include "../internal.h" |
| #include "../mem_internal.h" |
| #include "internal.h" |
| |
| |
| BSSL_NAMESPACE_BEGIN |
| namespace { |
| |
| // This file computes the X.509 policy graph, as described in RFC 9618. |
| // Implementation notes: |
| // |
| // (1) It does not track "qualifier_set". This is not needed as it is not |
| // output by this implementation. |
| // |
| // (2) "expected_policy_set" is not tracked explicitly and built temporarily |
| // as part of building the graph. |
| // |
| // (3) anyPolicy nodes are not tracked explicitly. |
| // |
| // (4) Some pruning steps are deferred to when policies are evaluated, as a |
| // reachability pass. |
| |
| bool is_any_policy(const ASN1_OBJECT *obj) { |
| return OBJ_obj2nid(obj) == NID_any_policy; |
| } |
| |
| // An X509PolicyNode is a node in the policy graph. It corresponds to a node |
| // from RFC 5280, section 6.1.2, step (a), but we store some fields differently. |
| struct X509PolicyNode { |
| static std::optional<X509PolicyNode> Create(const ASN1_OBJECT *policy) { |
| assert(!is_any_policy(policy)); |
| X509PolicyNode node; |
| node.policy.reset(OBJ_dup(policy)); |
| if (node.policy == nullptr) { |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| return node; |
| } |
| |
| bool operator<(const X509PolicyNode &other) const { |
| return OBJ_cmp(policy.get(), other.policy.get()) < 0; |
| } |
| |
| bool parent_is_any_policy() const { return parent_policies.empty(); } |
| |
| // policy is the "valid_policy" field from RFC 5280. |
| UniquePtr<ASN1_OBJECT> policy; |
| |
| // parent_policies, if non-empty, is the list of "valid_policy" values for all |
| // nodes which are a parent of this node. In this case, no entry in this list |
| // will be anyPolicy. This list is in no particular order and may contain |
| // duplicates if the corresponding certificate had duplicate mappings. |
| // |
| // If empty, this node has a single parent, anyPolicy. The node is then a root |
| // policy, and is in authorities-constrained-policy-set if it has a path to a |
| // leaf node. |
| // |
| // Note it is not possible for a policy to have both anyPolicy and a |
| // concrete policy as a parent. Section 6.1.3, step (d.1.ii) only runs if |
| // there was no match in step (d.1.i). We do not need to represent a parent |
| // list of, say, {anyPolicy, OID1, OID2}. |
| Vector<UniquePtr<ASN1_OBJECT>> parent_policies; |
| |
| // mapped is whether this node matches a policy mapping in the certificate. |
| bool mapped = false; |
| |
| // reachable is whether this node is reachable from some valid policy in the |
| // end-entity certificate. It is computed during |has_explicit_policy|. |
| bool reachable = false; |
| }; |
| |
| // An X509PolicyLevel is the collection of nodes at the same depth in the |
| // policy graph. This structure can also be used to represent a level's |
| // "expected_policy_set" values. See |process_policy_mappings|. |
| class X509PolicyLevel { |
| public: |
| bool has_any_policy() const { return has_any_policy_; } |
| bool is_empty() const { return !has_any_policy_ && nodes_.empty(); } |
| Span<const X509PolicyNode> nodes() const { return nodes_; } |
| |
| void set_has_any_policy(bool v) { has_any_policy_ = v; } |
| |
| // Although this is mutable, callers may not modify the node's policy. |
| Span<X509PolicyNode> nodes() { return Span(nodes_); } |
| |
| void Clear() { |
| has_any_policy_ = false; |
| nodes_.clear(); |
| } |
| |
| // Find returns the node corresponding to |policy|, or nullptr if none exists. |
| X509PolicyNode *Find(const ASN1_OBJECT *policy) { |
| // The list is sorted, so we can binary search. |
| auto it = std::lower_bound( |
| nodes_.begin(), nodes_.end(), policy, |
| [](const X509PolicyNode &node, const ASN1_OBJECT *obj) { |
| return OBJ_cmp(node.policy.get(), obj) < 0; |
| }); |
| if (it == nodes_.end() || OBJ_cmp(it->policy.get(), policy) != 0) { |
| return nullptr; |
| } |
| return &*it; |
| } |
| |
| // AddNodes adds the nodes in |nodes|. It returns true on success and false on |
| // error. No policy in |nodes| may already be present. This method leaves |
| // the objects in |nodes| in a moved-from state. |
| // |
| // This method re-sorts the nodes, so it runs in time proportional to the |
| // total size of the level. However, each level is only added to three times |
| // in the course of policy validation. |
| bool AddNodes(Span<X509PolicyNode> nodes) { |
| if (!nodes_.AppendMove(nodes)) { |
| return false; |
| } |
| std::sort(nodes_.begin(), nodes_.end()); |
| #if !defined(NDEBUG) |
| // There should be no duplicate nodes. |
| for (size_t i = 1; i < nodes_.size(); i++) { |
| assert(OBJ_cmp(nodes_[i - 1].policy.get(), nodes_[i].policy.get()) != 0); |
| } |
| #endif |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| // EraseNodesIf removes all nodes that satisfy the predicate |pred|. |
| template <typename Pred> |
| void EraseNodesIf(Pred pred) { |
| nodes_.EraseIf(pred); |
| } |
| |
| private: |
| // nodes is the list of nodes at this depth, except for the anyPolicy node, if |
| // any. This list is sorted by policy OID for efficient lookup. |
| Vector<X509PolicyNode> nodes_; |
| |
| // has_any_policy is whether there is an anyPolicy node at this depth. |
| bool has_any_policy_ = false; |
| }; |
| |
| int policyinfo_cmp(const POLICYINFO *const *a, const POLICYINFO *const *b) { |
| return OBJ_cmp((*a)->policyid, (*b)->policyid); |
| } |
| |
| // process_certificate_policies updates |level| to incorporate |x509|'s |
| // certificate policies extension. This implements steps (d) and (e) of RFC |
| // 5280, section 6.1.3. |level| must contain the previous level's |
| // "expected_policy_set" information. For all but the top-most level, this is |
| // the output of |process_policy_mappings|. |any_policy_allowed| specifies |
| // whether anyPolicy is allowed or inhibited, taking into account the exception |
| // for self-issued certificates. |
| bool process_certificate_policies(const X509 *x509, X509PolicyLevel *level, |
| int any_policy_allowed) { |
| int critical; |
| UniquePtr<CERTIFICATEPOLICIES> policies( |
| reinterpret_cast<CERTIFICATEPOLICIES *>(X509_get_ext_d2i( |
| x509, NID_certificate_policies, &critical, nullptr))); |
| if (policies == nullptr) { |
| if (critical != -1) { |
| return false; // Syntax error in the extension. |
| } |
| |
| // RFC 5280, section 6.1.3, step (e). |
| level->Clear(); |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| // certificatePolicies may not be empty. See RFC 5280, section 4.2.1.4. |
| // TODO(https://crbug.com/boringssl/443): Move this check into the parser. |
| if (sk_POLICYINFO_num(policies.get()) == 0) { |
| OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR(X509, X509_R_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION); |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| sk_POLICYINFO_set_cmp_func(policies.get(), policyinfo_cmp); |
| sk_POLICYINFO_sort(policies.get()); |
| bool cert_has_any_policy = false; |
| for (size_t i = 0; i < sk_POLICYINFO_num(policies.get()); i++) { |
| const POLICYINFO *policy = sk_POLICYINFO_value(policies.get(), i); |
| if (is_any_policy(policy->policyid)) { |
| cert_has_any_policy = true; |
| } |
| if (i > 0 && OBJ_cmp(sk_POLICYINFO_value(policies.get(), i - 1)->policyid, |
| policy->policyid) == 0) { |
| // Per RFC 5280, section 4.2.1.4, |policies| may not have duplicates. |
| OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR(X509, X509_R_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION); |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // This does the same thing as RFC 5280, section 6.1.3, step (d), though in |
| // a slightly different order. |level| currently contains |
| // "expected_policy_set" values of the previous level. See |
| // |process_policy_mappings| for details. |
| const bool previous_level_has_any_policy = level->has_any_policy(); |
| |
| // First, we handle steps (d.1.i) and (d.2). The net effect of these two |
| // steps is to intersect |level| with |policies|, ignoring anyPolicy if it |
| // is inhibited. |
| if (!cert_has_any_policy || !any_policy_allowed) { |
| level->EraseNodesIf([&](const X509PolicyNode &node) { |
| assert(sk_POLICYINFO_is_sorted(policies.get())); |
| // Erase the node if it not present in the current certificate. |
| POLICYINFO info; |
| info.policyid = node.policy.get(); |
| return !sk_POLICYINFO_find(policies.get(), nullptr, &info); |
| }); |
| level->set_has_any_policy(false); |
| } |
| |
| // Step (d.1.ii) may attach new nodes to the previous level's anyPolicy |
| // node. |
| if (previous_level_has_any_policy) { |
| Vector<X509PolicyNode> new_nodes; |
| for (const POLICYINFO *policy : policies.get()) { |
| // Though we've reordered the steps slightly, |policy| is in |level| if |
| // and only if it would have been a match in step (d.1.ii). |
| if (!is_any_policy(policy->policyid) && |
| level->Find(policy->policyid) == nullptr) { |
| auto node = X509PolicyNode::Create(policy->policyid); |
| if (!node || !new_nodes.Push(*std::move(node))) { |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| if (!level->AddNodes(Span(new_nodes))) { |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| int compare_issuer_policy(const POLICY_MAPPING *const *a, |
| const POLICY_MAPPING *const *b) { |
| return OBJ_cmp((*a)->issuerDomainPolicy, (*b)->issuerDomainPolicy); |
| } |
| |
| int compare_subject_policy(const POLICY_MAPPING *const *a, |
| const POLICY_MAPPING *const *b) { |
| return OBJ_cmp((*a)->subjectDomainPolicy, (*b)->subjectDomainPolicy); |
| } |
| |
| // process_policy_mappings processes the policy mappings extension of |cert|, |
| // whose corresponding graph level is |level|. |mapping_allowed| specifies |
| // whether policy mapping is inhibited at this point. On success, it returns an |
| // |X509PolicyLevel| containing the "expected_policy_set" for |level|. On error, |
| // it returns std::nullopt. This implements steps (a) and (b) of RFC 5280, |
| // section 6.1.4. |
| // |
| // We represent the "expected_policy_set" as an |X509PolicyLevel|. |
| // |has_any_policy| indicates whether there is an anyPolicy node with |
| // "expected_policy_set" of {anyPolicy}. If a node with policy oid P1 contains |
| // P2 in its "expected_policy_set", the level will contain a node of policy P2 |
| // with P1 in |parent_policies|. |
| // |
| // This is equivalent to the |X509PolicyLevel| that would result if the next |
| // certificates contained anyPolicy. |process_certificate_policies| will filter |
| // this result down to compute the actual level. |
| std::optional<X509PolicyLevel> process_policy_mappings(const X509 *cert, |
| X509PolicyLevel *level, |
| bool mapping_allowed) { |
| int critical; |
| UniquePtr<POLICY_MAPPINGS> mappings(reinterpret_cast<POLICY_MAPPINGS *>( |
| X509_get_ext_d2i(cert, NID_policy_mappings, &critical, nullptr))); |
| if (mappings == nullptr && critical != -1) { |
| // Syntax error in the policy mappings extension. |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| |
| if (mappings != nullptr) { |
| // PolicyMappings may not be empty. See RFC 5280, section 4.2.1.5. |
| // TODO(https://crbug.com/boringssl/443): Move this check into the parser. |
| if (sk_POLICY_MAPPING_num(mappings.get()) == 0) { |
| OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR(X509, X509_R_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION); |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| |
| // RFC 5280, section 6.1.4, step (a). |
| for (const POLICY_MAPPING *mapping : mappings.get()) { |
| if (is_any_policy(mapping->issuerDomainPolicy) || |
| is_any_policy(mapping->subjectDomainPolicy)) { |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Sort to group by issuerDomainPolicy. |
| sk_POLICY_MAPPING_set_cmp_func(mappings.get(), compare_issuer_policy); |
| sk_POLICY_MAPPING_sort(mappings.get()); |
| |
| if (mapping_allowed) { |
| // Mark nodes as mapped, and add any nodes to |level| which may be |
| // needed as part of RFC 5280, section 6.1.4, step (b.1). |
| Vector<X509PolicyNode> new_nodes; |
| const ASN1_OBJECT *last_policy = nullptr; |
| for (const POLICY_MAPPING *mapping : mappings.get()) { |
| // There may be multiple mappings with the same |issuerDomainPolicy|. |
| if (last_policy != nullptr && |
| OBJ_cmp(mapping->issuerDomainPolicy, last_policy) == 0) { |
| continue; |
| } |
| last_policy = mapping->issuerDomainPolicy; |
| |
| X509PolicyNode *node = level->Find(mapping->issuerDomainPolicy); |
| if (node != nullptr) { |
| node->mapped = true; |
| } else { |
| if (!level->has_any_policy()) { |
| continue; |
| } |
| auto new_node = X509PolicyNode::Create(mapping->issuerDomainPolicy); |
| if (!new_node) { |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| new_node->mapped = true; |
| if (!new_nodes.Push(*std::move(new_node))) { |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| if (!level->AddNodes(Span(new_nodes))) { |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| } else { |
| // RFC 5280, section 6.1.4, step (b.2). If mapping is inhibited, delete |
| // all mapped nodes. |
| level->EraseNodesIf([&](const X509PolicyNode &node) { |
| // |mappings| must have been sorted by |compare_issuer_policy|. |
| assert(sk_POLICY_MAPPING_is_sorted(mappings.get())); |
| // Check if the node was mapped. |
| POLICY_MAPPING mapping; |
| mapping.issuerDomainPolicy = node.policy.get(); |
| return sk_POLICY_MAPPING_find(mappings.get(), /*out_index=*/nullptr, |
| &mapping); |
| }); |
| // Dropping the mappings. |
| mappings = nullptr; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // If a node was not mapped, it retains the original "explicit_policy_set" |
| // value, itself. Add those to |mappings|. |
| if (mappings == nullptr) { |
| mappings.reset(sk_POLICY_MAPPING_new_null()); |
| if (mappings == nullptr) { |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| } |
| for (const X509PolicyNode &node : level->nodes()) { |
| if (!node.mapped) { |
| UniquePtr<POLICY_MAPPING> mapping(POLICY_MAPPING_new()); |
| if (mapping == nullptr) { |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| mapping->issuerDomainPolicy = OBJ_dup(node.policy.get()); |
| mapping->subjectDomainPolicy = OBJ_dup(node.policy.get()); |
| if (mapping->issuerDomainPolicy == nullptr || |
| mapping->subjectDomainPolicy == nullptr || |
| !PushToStack(mappings.get(), std::move(mapping))) { |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Sort to group by subjectDomainPolicy. |
| sk_POLICY_MAPPING_set_cmp_func(mappings.get(), compare_subject_policy); |
| sk_POLICY_MAPPING_sort(mappings.get()); |
| |
| // Convert |mappings| to our "expected_policy_set" representation. |
| Vector<X509PolicyNode> next_nodes; |
| for (POLICY_MAPPING *mapping : mappings.get()) { |
| // Skip mappings where |issuerDomainPolicy| does not appear in the graph. |
| if (!level->has_any_policy() && |
| level->Find(mapping->issuerDomainPolicy) == nullptr) { |
| continue; |
| } |
| |
| if (next_nodes.empty() || OBJ_cmp(next_nodes.back().policy.get(), |
| mapping->subjectDomainPolicy) != 0) { |
| auto new_node = X509PolicyNode::Create(mapping->subjectDomainPolicy); |
| if (!new_node || !next_nodes.Push(*std::move(new_node))) { |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // |mapping| is going to be destroyed, so steal its policy object. |
| UniquePtr<ASN1_OBJECT> policy( |
| std::exchange(mapping->issuerDomainPolicy, nullptr)); |
| if (!next_nodes.back().parent_policies.Push(std::move(policy))) { |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| X509PolicyLevel next; |
| next.set_has_any_policy(level->has_any_policy()); |
| if (!next.AddNodes(Span(next_nodes))) { |
| return std::nullopt; |
| } |
| return next; |
| } |
| |
| // apply_skip_certs, if |skip_certs| is non-NULL, sets |*value| to the minimum |
| // of its current value and |skip_certs|. It returns true on success and false |
| // if |skip_certs| is negative. |
| bool apply_skip_certs(const ASN1_INTEGER *skip_certs, size_t *value) { |
| if (skip_certs == nullptr) { |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| // TODO(https://crbug.com/boringssl/443): Move this check into the parser. |
| if (skip_certs->type & V_ASN1_NEG) { |
| OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR(X509, X509_R_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION); |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // If |skip_certs| does not fit in |uint64_t|, it must exceed |*value|. |
| uint64_t u64; |
| if (ASN1_INTEGER_get_uint64(&u64, skip_certs) && u64 < *value) { |
| *value = (size_t)u64; |
| } |
| ERR_clear_error(); |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| // process_policy_constraints updates |*explicit_policy|, |*policy_mapping|, and |
| // |*inhibit_any_policy| according to |x509|'s policy constraints and inhibit |
| // anyPolicy extensions. It returns one on success and zero on error. This |
| // implements steps (i) and (j) of RFC 5280, section 6.1.4. |
| bool process_policy_constraints(const X509 *x509, size_t *explicit_policy, |
| size_t *policy_mapping, |
| size_t *inhibit_any_policy) { |
| int critical; |
| UniquePtr<POLICY_CONSTRAINTS> constraints( |
| reinterpret_cast<POLICY_CONSTRAINTS *>( |
| X509_get_ext_d2i(x509, NID_policy_constraints, &critical, nullptr))); |
| if (constraints == nullptr && critical != -1) { |
| return false; |
| } |
| if (constraints != nullptr) { |
| if (constraints->requireExplicitPolicy == nullptr && |
| constraints->inhibitPolicyMapping == nullptr) { |
| // Per RFC 5280, section 4.2.1.11, at least one of the fields must be |
| // present. |
| OPENSSL_PUT_ERROR(X509, X509_R_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION); |
| return false; |
| } |
| if (!apply_skip_certs(constraints->requireExplicitPolicy, |
| explicit_policy) || |
| !apply_skip_certs(constraints->inhibitPolicyMapping, policy_mapping)) { |
| return false; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| UniquePtr<ASN1_INTEGER> inhibit_any_policy_ext( |
| reinterpret_cast<ASN1_INTEGER *>( |
| X509_get_ext_d2i(x509, NID_inhibit_any_policy, &critical, nullptr))); |
| if (inhibit_any_policy_ext == nullptr && critical != -1) { |
| return false; |
| } |
| return apply_skip_certs(inhibit_any_policy_ext.get(), inhibit_any_policy); |
| } |
| |
| // has_explicit_policy returns true if the set of authority-space policy OIDs |
| // |levels| has some non-empty intersection with |user_policies|, and false |
| // otherwise. This mirrors the logic in RFC 5280, section 6.1.5, step (g). This |
| // function modifies |levels| and should only be called at the end of policy |
| // evaluation. |
| bool has_explicit_policy(Span<X509PolicyLevel> levels, |
| const STACK_OF(ASN1_OBJECT) *user_policies) { |
| assert(user_policies == nullptr || sk_ASN1_OBJECT_is_sorted(user_policies)); |
| |
| // Step (g.i). If the policy graph is empty, the intersection is empty. |
| if (levels.empty() || levels.back().is_empty()) { |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| // Step (g.ii). If the policy graph is not empty and the user set contains |
| // anyPolicy, the intersection is the entire (non-empty) graph. |
| // |
| // If |user_policies| is empty, we interpret it as having a single anyPolicy |
| // value. The caller may also have supplied anyPolicy explicitly. |
| if (sk_ASN1_OBJECT_num(user_policies) == 0) { |
| return true; |
| } |
| for (const ASN1_OBJECT *user_policy : user_policies) { |
| if (is_any_policy(user_policy)) { |
| return true; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // Step (g.iii) does not delete anyPolicy nodes, so if the graph has |
| // anyPolicy, some explicit policy will survive. The actual intersection may |
| // synthesize some nodes in step (g.iii.3), but we do not return the policy |
| // list itself, so we skip actually computing this. |
| if (levels.back().has_any_policy()) { |
| return true; |
| } |
| |
| // We defer pruning the tree, so as we look for nodes with parent anyPolicy, |
| // step (g.iii.1), we must limit to nodes reachable from the bottommost level. |
| // Start by marking each of those nodes as reachable. |
| for (X509PolicyNode &node : levels.back().nodes()) { |
| node.reachable = true; |
| } |
| |
| const size_t num_levels = levels.size(); |
| for (size_t i = num_levels - 1; i < num_levels; i--) { |
| X509PolicyLevel &level = levels[i]; |
| for (X509PolicyNode &node : level.nodes()) { |
| if (!node.reachable) { |
| continue; |
| } |
| if (node.parent_is_any_policy()) { |
| // |node|'s parent is anyPolicy and is part of "valid_policy_node_set". |
| // If it exists in |user_policies|, the intersection is non-empty and we |
| // can return immediately. |
| if (sk_ASN1_OBJECT_find(user_policies, /*out_index=*/nullptr, |
| node.policy.get())) { |
| return true; |
| } |
| } else if (i > 0) { |
| // |node|'s parents are concrete policies. Mark the parents reachable, |
| // to be inspected by the next loop iteration. |
| X509PolicyLevel &prev = levels[i - 1]; |
| for (const auto &parent_policy : node.parent_policies) { |
| X509PolicyNode *parent_node = prev.Find(parent_policy.get()); |
| if (parent_node != nullptr) { |
| parent_node->reachable = true; |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| |
| return false; |
| } |
| |
| int asn1_object_cmp(const ASN1_OBJECT *const *a, const ASN1_OBJECT *const *b) { |
| return OBJ_cmp(*a, *b); |
| } |
| |
| } // namespace |
| |
| int X509_policy_check(const STACK_OF(X509) *certs, |
| const STACK_OF(ASN1_OBJECT) *user_policies, |
| unsigned long flags, X509 **out_current_cert) { |
| *out_current_cert = nullptr; |
| |
| // Skip policy checking if the chain is just the trust anchor. |
| const size_t num_certs = sk_X509_num(certs); |
| if (num_certs <= 1) { |
| return X509_V_OK; |
| } |
| |
| // See RFC 5280, section 6.1.2, steps (d) through (f). |
| size_t explicit_policy = |
| (flags & X509_V_FLAG_EXPLICIT_POLICY) ? 0 : num_certs + 1; |
| size_t inhibit_any_policy = |
| (flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY) ? 0 : num_certs + 1; |
| size_t policy_mapping = (flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_MAP) ? 0 : num_certs + 1; |
| |
| Vector<X509PolicyLevel> levels; |
| std::optional<X509PolicyLevel> level; |
| for (size_t i = num_certs - 2; i < num_certs; i--) { |
| X509 *cert = sk_X509_value(certs, i); |
| uint32_t ex_flags = X509_get_extension_flags(cert); |
| if (ex_flags & EXFLAG_INVALID) { |
| return X509_V_ERR_OUT_OF_MEM; |
| } |
| const bool is_self_issued = (ex_flags & EXFLAG_SI) != 0; |
| |
| // In all but the first iteration, the previous iteration will have prepared |
| // "expected_policy_set" for us as a staging level. |
| if (!level) { |
| assert(i == num_certs - 2); |
| level.emplace(); |
| level->set_has_any_policy(true); |
| } |
| |
| // RFC 5280, section 6.1.3, steps (d) and (e). |any_policy_allowed| is |
| // computed as in step (d.2). |
| const int any_policy_allowed = |
| inhibit_any_policy > 0 || (i > 0 && is_self_issued); |
| if (!process_certificate_policies(cert, &*level, any_policy_allowed)) { |
| *out_current_cert = cert; |
| return X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION; |
| } |
| |
| // RFC 5280, section 6.1.3, step (f). |
| if (explicit_policy == 0 && level->is_empty()) { |
| return X509_V_ERR_NO_EXPLICIT_POLICY; |
| } |
| |
| // Insert the completed level into the list. |
| if (!levels.Push(*std::exchange(level, std::nullopt))) { |
| return X509_V_ERR_OUT_OF_MEM; |
| } |
| level = std::nullopt; |
| |
| // If this is not the leaf certificate, we go to section 6.1.4. If it |
| // is the leaf certificate, we go to section 6.1.5 instead. |
| if (i != 0) { |
| // RFC 5280, section 6.1.4, steps (a) and (b). |
| level = process_policy_mappings(cert, &levels.back(), policy_mapping > 0); |
| if (!level) { |
| *out_current_cert = cert; |
| return X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // RFC 5280, section 6.1.4, step (h-j) for non-leaves, and section 6.1.5, |
| // step (a-b) for leaves. In the leaf case, RFC 5280 says only to update |
| // |explicit_policy|, but |policy_mapping| and |inhibit_any_policy| are no |
| // longer read at this point, so we use the same process. |
| if (i == 0 || !is_self_issued) { |
| if (explicit_policy > 0) { |
| explicit_policy--; |
| } |
| if (policy_mapping > 0) { |
| policy_mapping--; |
| } |
| if (inhibit_any_policy > 0) { |
| inhibit_any_policy--; |
| } |
| } |
| if (!process_policy_constraints(cert, &explicit_policy, &policy_mapping, |
| &inhibit_any_policy)) { |
| *out_current_cert = cert; |
| return X509_V_ERR_INVALID_POLICY_EXTENSION; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| // RFC 5280, section 6.1.5, step (g). We do not output the policy set, so it |
| // is only necessary to check if the user-constrained-policy-set is not empty. |
| if (explicit_policy == 0) { |
| // Build a sorted copy of |user_policies| for more efficient lookup. |
| STACK_OF(ASN1_OBJECT) *user_policies_sorted = nullptr; |
| // |user_policies_sorted|'s contents are owned by |user_policies|, so we do |
| // not use |sk_ASN1_OBJECT_pop_free|. |
| Cleanup cleanup = [&] { sk_ASN1_OBJECT_free(user_policies_sorted); }; |
| if (user_policies != nullptr) { |
| user_policies_sorted = sk_ASN1_OBJECT_dup(user_policies); |
| if (user_policies_sorted == nullptr) { |
| return X509_V_ERR_OUT_OF_MEM; |
| } |
| sk_ASN1_OBJECT_set_cmp_func(user_policies_sorted, asn1_object_cmp); |
| sk_ASN1_OBJECT_sort(user_policies_sorted); |
| } |
| |
| if (!has_explicit_policy(Span(levels), user_policies_sorted)) { |
| return X509_V_ERR_NO_EXPLICIT_POLICY; |
| } |
| } |
| |
| return X509_V_OK; |
| } |
| |
| BSSL_NAMESPACE_END |