| # Incorporating BoringSSL into a project |
| |
| **Note**: if your target project is not a Google project then first read the |
| [main README](/README.md) about the purpose of BoringSSL. |
| |
| ## Bazel |
| |
| If you are using [Bazel](https://bazel.build) then you can incorporate |
| BoringSSL as an external repository by using a commit from the |
| `master-with-bazel` branch. That branch is maintained by a bot from `master` |
| and includes the needed generated files and a top-level BUILD file. |
| |
| For example: |
| |
| git_repository( |
| name = "boringssl", |
| commit = "_some commit_", |
| remote = "https://boringssl.googlesource.com/boringssl", |
| ) |
| |
| You would still need to keep the referenced commit up to date if a specific |
| commit is referred to. |
| |
| ## Directory layout |
| |
| Typically projects create a `third_party/boringssl` directory to put |
| BoringSSL-specific files into. The source code of BoringSSL itself goes into |
| `third_party/boringssl/src`, either by copying or as a |
| [submodule](https://git-scm.com/docs/git-submodule). |
| |
| It's generally a mistake to put BoringSSL's source code into |
| `third_party/boringssl` directly because pre-built files and custom build files |
| need to go somewhere and merging these with the BoringSSL source code makes |
| updating things more complex. |
| |
| ## Build support |
| |
| BoringSSL is designed to work with many different build systems. Currently, |
| different projects use [GYP](https://gyp.gsrc.io/), |
| [GN](https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/master/docs/quick_start.md), |
| [Bazel](https://bazel.build/) and [Make](https://www.gnu.org/software/make/) to |
| build BoringSSL, without too much pain. |
| |
| The development build system is CMake and the CMake build knows how to |
| automatically generate the intermediate files that BoringSSL needs. However, |
| outside of the CMake environment, these intermediates are generated once and |
| checked into the incorporating project's source repository. This avoids |
| incorporating projects needing to support Perl and Go in their build systems. |
| |
| The script [`util/generate_build_files.py`](/util/generate_build_files.py) |
| expects to be run from the `third_party/boringssl` directory and to find the |
| BoringSSL source code in `src/`. You should pass it a single argument: the name |
| of the build system that you're using. If you don't use any of the supported |
| build systems then you should augment `generate_build_files.py` with support |
| for it. |
| |
| The script will pregenerate the intermediate files (see |
| [BUILDING.md](/BUILDING.md) for details about which tools will need to be |
| installed) and output helper files for that build system. It doesn't generate a |
| complete build script, just file and test lists, which change often. For |
| example, see the |
| [file](https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/third_party/boringssl/BUILD.generated.gni) |
| and |
| [test](https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/third_party/boringssl/BUILD.generated_tests.gni) |
| lists generated for GN in Chromium. |
| |
| Generally one checks in these generated files alongside the hand-written build |
| files. Periodically an engineer updates the BoringSSL revision, regenerates |
| these files and checks in the updated result. As an example, see how this is |
| done [in Chromium](https://code.google.com/p/chromium/codesearch#chromium/src/third_party/boringssl/). |
| |
| ## Defines |
| |
| BoringSSL does not present a lot of configurability in order to reduce the |
| number of configurations that need to be tested. But there are a couple of |
| \#defines that you may wish to set: |
| |
| `OPENSSL_NO_ASM` prevents the use of assembly code (although it's up to you to |
| ensure that the build system doesn't link it in if you wish to reduce binary |
| size). This will have a significant performance impact but can be useful if you |
| wish to use tools like |
| [AddressSanitizer](http://clang.llvm.org/docs/AddressSanitizer.html) that |
| interact poorly with assembly code. |
| |
| `OPENSSL_SMALL` removes some code that is especially large at some performance |
| cost. |
| |
| ## Symbols |
| |
| You cannot link multiple versions of BoringSSL or OpenSSL into a single binary |
| without dealing with symbol conflicts. If you are statically linking multiple |
| versions together, there's not a lot that can be done because C doesn't have a |
| module system. |
| |
| If you are using multiple versions in a single binary, in different shared |
| objects, ensure you build BoringSSL with `-fvisibility=hidden` and do not |
| export any of BoringSSL's symbols. This will prevent any collisions with other |
| verisons that may be included in other shared objects. Note that this requires |
| that all callers of BoringSSL APIs live in the same shared object as BoringSSL. |
| |
| If you require that BoringSSL APIs be used across shared object boundaries, |
| continue to build with `-fvisibility=hidden` but define |
| `BORINGSSL_SHARED_LIBRARY` in both BoringSSL and consumers. BoringSSL's own |
| source files (but *not* consumers' source files) must also build with |
| `BORINGSSL_IMPLEMENTATION` defined. This will export BoringSSL's public symbols |
| in the resulting shared object while hiding private symbols. However note that, |
| as with a static link, this precludes dynamically linking with another version |
| of BoringSSL or OpenSSL. |