BoringSSL as a whole is not FIPS validated. However, there is a core library (called BoringCrypto) that is undergoing validation at time of writing. This document contains some notes about the design of the FIPS module and some documentation on performing FIPS-related tasks. This is not a substitute for reading the offical Security Policy (which, at the time of writing, has not yet been published).
CAVP results are calculated by
fipstools/cavp, but that binary is almost always run by
fipstools/run_cavp.go. The latter knows the set of tests to be processed and the flags needed to configure
cavp for each one. It must be run from the top of a CAVP directory and needs the following options:
-oracle-bin: points to the location of
-no-fax: this is needed to suppress checking of the FAX files, which are only included in sample sets.
In order to demonstrate failures of the various FIPS 140 tests, BoringSSL can be built in ways that will trigger such failures. This is controlled by passing
-DFIPS_BREAK_TEST=(test to break) to CMake, where the following tests can be specified:
The utility in
util/fipstools/break-hash.go can be used to corrupt the FIPS module inside a binary and thus trigger a failure of the integrity test. Note that the binary must not be stripped, otherwise the utility will not be able to find the FIPS module.
FIPS 140-2 requires that one of its PRNGs be used (which they call DRBGs). In BoringCrypto, we use CTR-DRBG with AES-256 exclusively and
RAND_bytes (the primary interface for the rest of the system to get random data) takes its output from there.
The DRBG state is kept in a thread-local structure and is seeded from one of the following entropy sources in preference order: RDRAND (on Intel chips),
/dev/urandom. In the case of
/dev/urandom, in order to ensure that the system has a minimum level of entropy, BoringCrypto polls the kernel until the estimated entropy is at least 256 bits. This is a poor man's version of
getrandom and we strongly recommend using a kernel recent enough to support the real thing.
In FIPS mode, each of those entropy sources is subject to a 10× overread. That is, when n bytes of entropy are needed, 10n bytes will be read from the entropy source and XORed down to n bytes. Reads from the entropy source are also processed in blocks of 16 bytes and if two consecutive chunks are equal the process will abort.
The CTR-DRBG is reseeded every 4096 calls to
RAND_bytes. Thus the process will randomly crash about every 2135 calls.
The FIPS PRNGs allow “additional input” to be fed into a given call. We use this feature to be as robust as possible to state duplication from process forks and VM copies: for every call we read 32 bytes of “additional data” from the entropy source (without overread) which means that cloned states will diverge at the next call to
RAND_bytes. This is called “prediction resistance” by FIPS, but we do not claim this property in a FIPS context because we don't implement it the way they want.
There is a second interface to the RNG which allows the caller to supply bytes that will be XORed into the generated additional data (
RAND_bytes_with_additional_data). This is used in the ECDSA code to include the message and private key in the generation of k, the ECDSA nonce. This allows ECDSA to be robust to entropy failures while still following the FIPS rules.
FIPS requires that RNG state be zeroed when the process exits. In order to implement this, all per-thread RNG states are tracked in a linked list and a destructor function is included which clears them. In order for this to be safe in the presence of threads, a lock is used to stop all other threads from using the RNG once this process has begun. Thus the main thread exiting may cause other threads to deadlock, and drawing on entropy in a destructor function may also deadlock.
FIPS-140 mandates that a module calculate an HMAC of its own code in a constructor function and compare the result to a known-good value. Typical code produced by a C compiler includes large numbers of relocations: places in the machine code where the linker needs to resolve and inject the final value of a symbolic expression. These relocations mean that the bytes that make up any specific bit of code generally aren't known until the final link has completed.
Additionally, because of shared libraries and ASLR, some relocations can only be resolved at run-time, and thus targets of those relocations vary even after the final link.
BoringCrypto is linked (often statically) into a large number of binaries. It would be a significant cost if each of these binaries had to be post-processed in order to calculate the known-good HMAC value. We would much prefer if the value could be calculated, once, when BoringCrypto itself is compiled.
In order for the value to be calculated before the final link, there can be no relocations in the hashed code and data. This document describes how we build C and assembly code in order to produce an object file containing all the code and data for the FIPS module without that code having any relocations.
First, all the C source files for the module are compiled as a single unit by compiling a single source file that
#includes them all (this is
-fPIC flag is used to cause the compiler to use IP-relative addressing in many (but not all) cases. Also the
-S flag is used to instruct the compiler to produce a textual assembly file rather than a binary object file.
The textual assembly file is then processed by a script to merge in assembly implementations of some primitives and to eliminate the remaining sources of relocations.
The most obvious cause of relocations are out-calls from the module to non-cryptographic functions outside of the module. Most obviously these include
memcpy and other libc functions, but also include calls to support code in BoringSSL such as functions for managing the error queue.
Offsets to these functions cannot be known until the final link because only the linker sees the object files containing them. Thus calls to these functions are rewritten into an IP-relative jump to a redirector function. The redirector functions contain a single jump instruction to the real function and are placed outside of the module and are thus not hashed (see diagram).
In this diagram, the integrity check hashes from
module_end. Since this does not cover the jump to
memcpy, it's fine that the linker will poke the final offset into that instruction.
Normally read-only data is placed in a
.data segment that doesn‘t get mapped into memory with execute permissions. However, the offset of the data segment from the text segment is another thing that isn’t determined until the final link. In order to fix data offsets before the link, read-only data is simply placed in the module's
.text segment. This might make building ROP chains easier for an attacker, but so it goes.
One special case is
rel.ro data, which is data that contains function pointers. Since these function pointers are absolute, they are written by the dynamic linker at run-time and so we must eliminate them. The pattern that causes them is when we have a static
EVP_CIPHER object thus, inside the module, we'll change this pattern to instead to reserve space in the BSS for the object, and add a
CRYPTO_once_t to protect its initialisation. The script will generate functions outside of the module that return pointers to these areas of memory—they effectively act like a special-purpose malloc calls that cannot fail.
Mutable data is a problem. It cannot be in the text segment because the text segment is mapped read-only. If it's in a different segment then the code cannot reference it with a known, IP-relative offset because the segment layout is only fixed during the final link.
In order to allow this we use a similar design to the redirector functions: the code references a symbol that's in the text segment, but out of the module and thus not hashed. A relocation record is emitted to instruct the linker to poke the final offset to the variable in that location. Thus the only change needed is an extra indirection when loading the value.
The script performs a number of other transformations which are worth noting but do not warrant their own sections:
_local_target appended to the name. References to the global symbols are rewritten to use these duplicates instead. Otherwise, although the generated code uses IP-relative references, relocations are emitted for global symbols in case they are overridden by a different object file during the link.
.rodata, are moved to the
.text section, inside the module, so module code may reference it without relocations.
_bss_get appended, which returns its address.
module_end in the diagram above).
In order to actually implement the integrity test, a constructor function within the module calculates an HMAC from
module_end using a fixed, all-zero key. It compares the result with the known-good value added (by the script) to the unhashed portion of the text segment. If they don't match, it calls
exit in an infinite loop.
Initially the known-good value will be incorrect. Another script (
inject-hash.go) calculates the correct value from the assembled object and injects it back into the object.
(This is based on reading OpenSSL's user guide and inspecting the code of OpenSSL FIPS 2.0.12.)
OpenSSL's solution to this problem is broadly similar but has a number of differences:
ld -r (the partial linking mode) to merge a number of object files into their
fipscanister.o. For BoringCrypto, we merge all the C source files by building a single C file that #includes all the others, and we merge the assembly sources by appending them to the assembly output from the C compiler.
fips_end.o, in order to establish the
module_end values. BoringCrypto adds labels at the correct places in the assembly.
FIPS_module_mode_set is called. BoringCrypto does it in a constructor function. Failure of the test is non-fatal in OpenSSL, BoringCrypto will crash.
fipscanister.o.sha1 to check that the compiled object doesn’t change before linking. Since BoringCrypto's module is fixed after compilation, the final integrity check is unbroken through the linking process.
Some of the similarities are worth noting: