)]}'
{
  "commit": "fb16e33126f828bc93f8138d9554b1a143ca197f",
  "tree": "8dab24cd59ff20516168477e8eabad45c3e695d6",
  "parents": [
    "854c044693551a640add457d148ee5d6db33d8aa"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Xiangfei Ding",
    "email": "xfding@google.com",
    "time": "Wed May 06 08:23:29 2026 +0000"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Xiangfei Ding",
    "email": "xfding@google.com",
    "time": "Wed May 06 06:28:12 2026 -0700"
  },
  "message": "x509: Use explicit has_value on optionals\n\nIn the last patch not all such cases were caught.\nWe should clean them all up by now.\n\nSigned-off-by: Xiangfei Ding \u003cxfding@google.com\u003e\nChange-Id: I1705878afa53a02b0c33b446aa4aa0b56a6a6964\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/94867\nPresubmit-BoringSSL-Verified: boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com \u003cboringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com\u003e\nReviewed-by: Adam Langley \u003cagl@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "4a6de7270a40eabb570fb5a311f333a24ed05fad",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "crypto/x509/policy.cc",
      "new_id": "0ab37547d6e645dbed8b37f347aa83058be612c0",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "crypto/x509/policy.cc"
    }
  ]
}
