Raw Public Keys: Store peer cert type and RPK in SSL_SESSION This adds the peer's negotiated cert type and peer RPK (if any) to SSL_SESSION. This is needed for RPKs to be supported in resumption. The peer RPK field is not yet filled in, but will be after the next CL implements parsing received RPKs. For previously serialized session tickets, we assume the peer cert type was the default (X.509) for backwards compatibility, and we only include the peer cert type in the serialized session if it was not the default. Split handshakes are not supported with RPKs. The previous fields for server/client_cert_type in SSL_HANDSHAKE are reframed as client_auth_cert_type (storing client_cert_type for a client) and peer_cert_type (storing the peer's cert type for both servers and clients). For a server, the server_cert_type doesn't need to be stored because it's determined by the selected credential. This removes the previously added OpenSSL-compatible APIs for getting the negotiated client/server cert type, because now we can't always know the cert type that we presented to the peer (e.g. in the resumption case). The negotiated peer cert type should always be determined, so we provide a new getter for that. Update-Note: This removes SSL_get_negotiated_client_cert_type() and SSL_get_negotiated_server_cert_type(), in favor of a new function SSL_get_peer_cert_type(). Bug: 467663225 Change-Id: If20e597eb858649a491a7dc41f0c2e0c6a6a6964 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/89831 Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Commit-Queue: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: