util/fipstools: add EDDSA ACVP support

This commit extends the acvptool subprocess package to support the
EDDSA test vectors and expected responses defined by
draft-celi-acvp-eddsa:

https://pages.nist.gov/ACVP/draft-celi-acvp-eddsa.html

There was a pre-existing registration for the "EDDSA" command, but it
was using the ecdsa.go subprocess code that isn't a match to the
EDDSA specification. No EDDSA capabilities were being claimed in the
modulewrapper.cc or testmodulewrapper.go JSON so I suspect this was
perhaps the start of unfinished support (?).

There are a few quirks for EDDSA compared to ECDSA beyond the
differences in vectors/expected results. Notably there is the option to
advertise the prehashed capability to exercise Ed25519ph.

To facilitate the testmodulewrapper being able to implement EDDSA keyVer
there's a new dependency added on Filippo's edwards25519 package. The go
stdlib equivalent is not exported for external use.

Change-Id: Id0571470202a2761125cc9af3c5f0593b0b94ccc
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/72207
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
9 files changed
tree: 7523719fff77389e1601609e213050d9b39c6606
  1. .bcr/
  2. .github/
  3. cmake/
  4. crypto/
  5. decrepit/
  6. docs/
  7. fuzz/
  8. gen/
  9. include/
  10. infra/
  11. pki/
  12. rust/
  13. ssl/
  14. third_party/
  15. tool/
  16. util/
  17. .bazelignore
  18. .bazelrc
  19. .clang-format
  20. .gitignore
  21. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  22. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  23. BUILD.bazel
  24. build.json
  25. BUILDING.md
  26. CMakeLists.txt
  27. codereview.settings
  28. CONTRIBUTING.md
  29. FUZZING.md
  30. go.mod
  31. go.sum
  32. INCORPORATING.md
  33. LICENSE
  34. MODULE.bazel
  35. MODULE.bazel.lock
  36. PORTING.md
  37. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  38. README.md
  39. SANDBOXING.md
  40. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: