Reject legacy_cookie in DTLS 1.3 There's no practical consequence to this, but RFC 9147 says: > legacy_cookie: A DTLS 1.3-only client MUST set the legacy_cookie field > to zero length. If a DTLS 1.3 ClientHello is received with any other > value in this field, the server MUST abort the handshake with an > "illegal_parameter" alert. Fixed: 516205743 Change-Id: I9c3ee0f2dcb7f68275a3713fee95cc0942441c09 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/95867 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: