| commit | dc6c1b83819cb3788c60dd669241adc6752a4604 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org> | Sun Jan 17 22:21:42 2016 -1000 |
| committer | David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> | Fri Mar 25 21:39:52 2016 +0000 |
| tree | 79b80908936110ffebe36f6adabba913aebe8e04 | |
| parent | db50299b247bb7eab4df8c8fdd82fc727e8f67c8 [diff] |
Fix build when using Visual Studio 2015 Update 1. Many of the compatibility issues are described at https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/mt612856.aspx. The macros that suppressed warnings on a per-function basis no longer work in Update 1, so replace them with #pragmas. Update 1 warns when |size_t| arguments to |printf| are casted, so stop doing that casting. Unfortunately, this requires an ugly hack to continue working in MSVC 2013 as MSVC 2013 doesn't support "%zu". Finally, Update 1 has new warnings, some of which need to be suppressed. --- Updated by davidben to give up on suppressing warnings in crypto/x509 and crypto/x509v3 as those directories aren't changed much from upstream. In each of these cases, upstream opted just blindly initialize the variable, so do the same. Also switch C4265 to level 4, per Microsoft's recommendation and work around a bug in limits.h that happens to get fixed by Google include order style. (limits.h is sensitive to whether corecrt.h, pulled in by stddef.h and some other headers, is included before it. The reason it affected just one file is we often put the file's header first, which means base.h is pulling in stddef.h. Relying on this is ugly, but it's no worse than what everything else is doing and this doesn't seem worth making something as tame as limits.h so messy to use.) Change-Id: I02d1f935356899f424d3525d03eca401bfa3e6cd Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/7480 Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: