)]}'
{
  "commit": "c0ae579dbbcd47ca60fd9539bf6cfc1bd0b434e9",
  "tree": "b886e0659945767f3825b57aa0fedc0b4900fa19",
  "parents": [
    "936fcd340925246594848c55c2162799f639155c"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "David Benjamin",
    "email": "davidben@google.com",
    "time": "Wed Dec 20 22:37:52 2023 -0500"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Boringssl LUCI CQ",
    "email": "boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Tue Jan 02 23:52:27 2024 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Do a better job testing expiration checks\n\nInstead of staggering the ranges, we can just generate three variants of\neach certificate. Also internal_verify is written in a remarkably goofy\nway, so the partial chain case is a little interesting and worth\ntesting.\n\nChange-Id: I94bfe58f54c5da2b88581af204c4e9d5b919f50b\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/65047\nReviewed-by: Bob Beck \u003cbbe@google.com\u003e\nAuto-Submit: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\nCommit-Queue: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "ab8ef7f65550db0b4ac9dcf4d884a615011af4bd",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "crypto/x509/x509_test.cc",
      "new_id": "8b9cd64f1def98eb10654c8562cff92f2c96f824",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "crypto/x509/x509_test.cc"
    }
  ]
}