Reject invalid IPv4 addresses in ipv4_from_asc

The old scanf-based parser accepted all kinds of invalid inputs like:
"1.2.3.4.5"
"1.2.3.4 "
"1.2.3. 4"
" 1.2.3.4"
"1.2.3.4."
"1.2.3.+4"
"1.2.3.4.example.test"
"1.2.3.01"
"1.2.3.0x1"

Thanks to Amir Mohamadi for pointing this out in
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/68167. This is a
different implementation since patching sscanf doesn't quite catch all
the cases. Add a bunch of tests, some imported from Amr's patch to
OpenSSL upstream, plus a bunch of my own. (IPv6 parsing is complicated!)

Update-Note: The deprecated (and dangerous) string-based APIs for
configuring X.509 extensions will no longer silently misinterpret some
invalid inputs as IPv4 addresses. This was run through TGP internally
without any issue.

Change-Id: I66e223a466cc3e74df9f9ddc8aef3b6b6c790f7e
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/68567
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
2 files changed
tree: 9d3923ee255a8fff69083b0cd9cf21f0c46679af
  1. .github/
  2. cmake/
  3. crypto/
  4. decrepit/
  5. fuzz/
  6. gen/
  7. include/
  8. pki/
  9. rust/
  10. ssl/
  11. third_party/
  12. tool/
  13. util/
  14. .bazelignore
  15. .bazelrc
  16. .clang-format
  17. .gitignore
  18. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  19. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  20. BUILD.bazel
  21. build.json
  22. BUILDING.md
  23. CMakeLists.txt
  24. codereview.settings
  25. CONTRIBUTING.md
  26. FUZZING.md
  27. go.mod
  28. go.sum
  29. INCORPORATING.md
  30. LICENSE
  31. MODULE.bazel
  32. MODULE.bazel.lock
  33. PORTING.md
  34. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  35. README.md
  36. SANDBOXING.md
  37. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: