)]}'
{
  "commit": "acb9ad12e006ccd770a7543f1d919d0c411e6f71",
  "tree": "e98b4feb0d149aad6dd2f14c7d542a91a0a02b07",
  "parents": [
    "89d22ce47b34ced182d1dfba428bb4f3f0678285"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Adam Langley",
    "email": "agl@chromium.org",
    "time": "Wed Oct 01 10:36:15 2025 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Boringssl LUCI CQ",
    "email": "boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Tue Oct 07 11:18:40 2025 -0700"
  },
  "message": "Unify the HPKE implementation for ML-KEM.\n\nML-KEM-768 and ML-KEM-1024 HPKE implementations are roughly copy-pastes\nwith \"768\" changed to \"1024\". C++ templates are able to do that sort of\nthing and remove the code duplication.\n\nChange-Id: I6133d1fe5017539c479c60482a465ef94a036ff4\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/82487\nReviewed-by: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\nCommit-Queue: Adam Langley \u003cagl@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "d49882a188c509867ed93b619b5586b836cd80cf",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "crypto/hpke/hpke.cc",
      "new_id": "38fba751f767b952ca77313ff6ec06601a36519c",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "crypto/hpke/hpke.cc"
    }
  ]
}