| commit | 10f78d00991fdb54c7cedb823ff42e546d0af6c9 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com> | Thu Oct 16 00:29:30 2025 -0700 |
| committer | Boringssl LUCI CQ <boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> | Wed Oct 22 10:15:44 2025 -0700 |
| tree | 958dbb94cc140dc4d972c560a6679e969113a19e | |
| parent | ee63f283122d75753dd923caa0fbfc52633b3e19 [diff] |
Make constant-sized calls to Span::first/last/subspan compile-time sized. This uses the newly added first<N>, last<N> and subspan<S, N> methods. Also, changed subspan<0, N> to first<N> when it could be shown that the input span has at least N elements based on checks/asserts before it. This makes the return type compile-time sized even if the input span is not. NOT doing thsis however if: - The span is only used within the same function in a simple scope with no chance for errors compile-time checks would catch - The span is only passed to other functions or returned in cases where obviously the span has to be runtime sized (like if calling through a function pointer or returning as a return value) - The span is runtime-sized based on a runtime-sized function argument or other data source that can't feasibly be made statically sized Tested: IDA/Diaphora and ghidriff find no differences in generated code other than type identifiers with the extra template argument. Change-Id: I0eb52abd88f9f55a6651ddc333767e4e9345c03f Bug: 390229582 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/82887 Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: