commit | 7fb4d3da5082225c7180267e9daad291887ce982 | [log] [tgz] |
---|---|---|
author | David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> | Fri Aug 23 15:27:03 2024 -0400 |
committer | Boringssl LUCI CQ <boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> | Tue Aug 27 17:49:40 2024 +0000 |
tree | 02678d9eead8a0e8f1f420d1b749143f6bb097ce | |
parent | 6f7c3dee22c40edd32e3170dd052126f7a9d9d5c [diff] |
Implement X25519MLKEM768 for TLS ML-KEM is now finalized, so uses of Kyber should migrate to ML-KEM. This adds the new codepoint for TLS, X25519MLKEM768 from draft-kwiatkowski-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-01. One detail to call out: where the Kyber hybrid put X25519 first, this one places MLKEM768 first. Section 3 of the draft discusses why. Bug: 40910498 Change-Id: I18862cd5d25d6ab6c4b38514e8333684dc5e3778 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/70547 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: