tree ac2a33520c333ade8232b9c15be4c5240b3c34f1
parent 0c89ac43566cb05669058e2d4ffd631d0ae494ca
author David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> 1731966114 -0500
committer Boringssl LUCI CQ <boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> 1732579308 +0000

Don't refer to key_update_requested responses as ACKs

It's a bit confusing when DTLS 1.3 also needs to ACK the KeyUpdate
message itself. I was going to call it a "reply", but it turned out that
none of the instances really needed to refer to this.

Bug: 42290594
Change-Id: I1cb674755920a0d7567b4c8eed46f12a0294faa5
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/73307
Reviewed-by: Nick Harper <nharper@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>