Don't suppress CMAKE_(C,CXX)_FLAGS in MSVC builds

All this time, since the very start of the project, our MSVC builds have
ignored the caller-supplied CMAKE_(C,CXX)_FLAGS on accident. This means,
all this time, we have never been using our OPENSSL_SMALL builds on CI
because those happened to set -DOPENSSL_SMALL in CMAKE_(C,CXX)_FLAGS
rather than the CMake toggle.

As a result, crbug.com/427018041 did not get noticed on CI. Whoops!

Update-Note: MSVC builds that pass CMAKE_(C,CXX)_FLAGS will start to
actually honor those flags. That it didn't work before was a long,
long-standing bug.

Bug: 427018041
Change-Id: I5be9d407b0aa37e2061257e4711f06e9711cfcfa
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/79847
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
1 file changed
tree: f80b6a899806bd526bcbff9591768d91a7a8c260
  1. .bcr/
  2. .github/
  3. cmake/
  4. crypto/
  5. decrepit/
  6. docs/
  7. fuzz/
  8. gen/
  9. include/
  10. infra/
  11. pki/
  12. rust/
  13. ssl/
  14. third_party/
  15. tool/
  16. util/
  17. .bazelignore
  18. .bazelrc
  19. .bazelversion
  20. .clang-format
  21. .gitignore
  22. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  23. AUTHORS
  24. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  25. BUILD.bazel
  26. build.json
  27. BUILDING.md
  28. CMakeLists.txt
  29. codereview.settings
  30. CONTRIBUTING.md
  31. FUZZING.md
  32. go.mod
  33. go.sum
  34. INCORPORATING.md
  35. LICENSE
  36. MODULE.bazel
  37. MODULE.bazel.lock
  38. PORTING.md
  39. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  40. README.md
  41. SANDBOXING.md
  42. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: