Google Git
Sign in
boringssl / boringssl / 5ec4b35773155a46dc4a4a1db2046831482100e7
commit5ec4b35773155a46dc4a4a1db2046831482100e7[log] [tgz]
authorDavid Benjamin <davidben@google.com>Mon Jul 07 11:54:59 2025 -0400
committerBoringssl LUCI CQ <boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>Mon Jul 07 14:38:20 2025 -0700
treeb0726becfe9302a2b008773a262499769a8ebb23
parent6aefe37a96d3ce6432f57450679199886b0f7a73 [diff]
bssl-crypto: Test that we don't accidentally accept RSA-PSS keys

The code is currently written in a way that would accept them if we
added support for EVP_PKEY_RSA_PSS naively. Add a test so we don't
regress this.

Bug: 384818542
Change-Id: I45b78647400c8ac08e0b159b7b9ed5f2d66f8544
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/80269
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
1 file changed
tree: b0726becfe9302a2b008773a262499769a8ebb23
  1. .bcr/
  2. .github/
  3. cmake/
  4. crypto/
  5. decrepit/
  6. docs/
  7. fuzz/
  8. gen/
  9. include/
  10. infra/
  11. pki/
  12. rust/
  13. ssl/
  14. third_party/
  15. tool/
  16. util/
  17. .bazelignore
  18. .bazelrc
  19. .bazelversion
  20. .clang-format
  21. .gitignore
  22. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  23. AUTHORS
  24. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  25. BUILD.bazel
  26. build.json
  27. BUILDING.md
  28. CMakeLists.txt
  29. codereview.settings
  30. CONTRIBUTING.md
  31. FUZZING.md
  32. go.mod
  33. go.sum
  34. INCORPORATING.md
  35. LICENSE
  36. MODULE.bazel
  37. MODULE.bazel.lock
  38. PORTING.md
  39. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  40. README.md
  41. SANDBOXING.md
  42. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: