)]}'
{
  "commit": "5b58c63b65e09fc78d741c5d8a18d2494fd8a085",
  "tree": "b7bd448a297b6b7bdaff207a17a26a4a3e0bf9dd",
  "parents": [
    "740744bc06fd9718c983bc83b61fd13cd428ae2e"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Rudolf Polzer",
    "email": "rpolzer@google.com",
    "time": "Thu Oct 23 05:41:53 2025 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Boringssl LUCI CQ",
    "email": "boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Fri Oct 24 13:09:58 2025 -0700"
  },
  "message": "EVP_DecryptUpdate: fix comment about required buffer size.\n\nThis has been wrong in BoringSSL\u0027s header file. I assume no existing\ncode actually violates this requirement, as OpenSSL\u0027s docs are clear\nabout requiring an entire blocksize additional buffer.\n\nBug: 42290361\nChange-Id: Ifdfe90a5a24a1e6ea1736914cb8889c3e23867c5\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/83167\nCommit-Queue: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\nReviewed-by: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\nAuto-Submit: Rudolf Polzer \u003crpolzer@google.com\u003e\nReviewed-by: Adam Langley \u003cagl@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "13e68ad20ac08a462bb577d7f99e2c6f167579fa",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "include/openssl/cipher.h",
      "new_id": "a5533caf45eaacc4baef4a73d97e9bc2b6e3a942",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "include/openssl/cipher.h"
    }
  ]
}