Do not implement SSL_get_traffic_secrets for QUIC and DTLS

This is implemented by looking at the saved current read and write
secrets. That state is used by KeyUpdate and this logic.

As part of tidying up the epoch state for DTLS 1.3, I ran into that
state because DTLS does not have a single current read/write secret. But
it also isn't ideal for QUIC. For QUIC, the problem is that QUIC drives
KeyUpdates outside of TLS, but that means we'll just hold on to the
initial traffic secrets in memory, which can derive all the rotated
ones.

So let's for now, just limit this API to TLS. We can decide later
whether to also allow it for DTLS (after very carefully defining what
the "current" epoch means). I don't think we'd ever allow it for QUIC
given how QUIC is intended to work.

(This change doesn't actually fix any of the internal storage, just
breaks the API that would leak it. Changing the internal storage will be
in later CLs.)

Bug: 42290608
Change-Id: I5d4b170a5a80a7cc0657a957ae20135d742891d2
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/71647
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
3 files changed
tree: 5c46ef08688f9f98c35a13125503a836473c699b
  1. .bcr/
  2. .github/
  3. cmake/
  4. crypto/
  5. decrepit/
  6. docs/
  7. fuzz/
  8. gen/
  9. include/
  10. pki/
  11. rust/
  12. ssl/
  13. third_party/
  14. tool/
  15. util/
  16. .bazelignore
  17. .bazelrc
  18. .clang-format
  19. .gitignore
  20. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  21. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  22. BUILD.bazel
  23. build.json
  24. BUILDING.md
  25. CMakeLists.txt
  26. codereview.settings
  27. CONTRIBUTING.md
  28. FUZZING.md
  29. go.mod
  30. go.sum
  31. INCORPORATING.md
  32. LICENSE
  33. MODULE.bazel
  34. MODULE.bazel.lock
  35. PORTING.md
  36. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  37. README.md
  38. SANDBOXING.md
  39. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: