)]}'
{
  "commit": "559e8f954a331a94cc56809d747fe05cfc43abe6",
  "tree": "e89f61fe4fac9e4aabf72dfc498af5a3d5e694ec",
  "parents": [
    "ed44d6f8deb450d8178908027ff46a0252b2d405"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Lily Chen",
    "email": "chlily@google.com",
    "time": "Thu Oct 09 13:54:23 2025 -0400"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Boringssl LUCI CQ",
    "email": "boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Thu Oct 09 11:10:08 2025 -0700"
  },
  "message": "Allow empty extension lists in X.509\n\nEmpty X.509 extension lists should be rejected according to spec, but\nthis change reverts the parts of\nhttps://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/82087 that\nreject empty extension lists, to avoid breakage due to invalid certs\nwith empty extension lists that were previously accepted as valid.\n\nCRLs with empty extension lists are still rejected.\n\nChange-Id: I945bec9684c5315d26ea364c62f7809f20be4909\nBug: 442221114\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/82707\nReviewed-by: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\nCommit-Queue: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\nAuto-Submit: Lily Chen \u003cchlily@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "c1376823e894bcd6cea8ab6ad2aef110253da17c",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "crypto/x509/x509_test.cc",
      "new_id": "063ae8e303400679230aec33101501c8077defac",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "crypto/x509/x509_test.cc"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "5467777e9a8e280fa554676dd2c41bd54f7f68b4",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "crypto/x509/x_x509.cc",
      "new_id": "a572042c73992f5a95a3ca2241af09b86ff58889",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "crypto/x509/x_x509.cc"
    }
  ]
}