|author||Adam Langley <firstname.lastname@example.org>||Wed Jan 23 13:52:17 2019 -0800|
|committer||CQ bot account: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>||Wed Jan 23 22:38:56 2019 +0000|
Make 256-bit ciphers a preference for CECPQ2, not a requirement. If 256-bit ciphers are a requirement for CECPQ2 then that introduces a link between supported ciphers and supported groups: offering CECPQ2 without a 256-bit cipher is invalid. But that's a little weird since these things were otherwise independent. So, rather than require a 256-bit cipher for CECPQ2, just prefer them. Change-Id: I491749e41708cd9c5eeed5b4ae23c11e5c0b9725 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34504 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <email@example.com> Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: