)]}'
{
  "commit": "4972efd0f964c3ae5de5085b7cfaecfb3f44833d",
  "tree": "a01b478632bb1c66742d6cb8b6cf6f1fa177dbcd",
  "parents": [
    "f42be90d665b6a376177648ccbb76fbbd6497c13"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "David Benjamin",
    "email": "davidben@google.com",
    "time": "Mon Jan 22 12:14:57 2024 -0500"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Boringssl LUCI CQ",
    "email": "boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Mon Jan 22 17:44:07 2024 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Use four-iterator std::equal for bssl::Span::operator\u003d\u003d\n\nAt one point we targetted C++11 and had to use the unsafe three-iterator\nstd::equal. Then we had to write the loop by hand because the pragma to\nsuppress an MSVC warning did not work:\nhttps://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/18384\n\nWe now target C++14, so just use the four-iterator version. libc++\nwill then be able to specialize it into a memcmp call.\n\nAlso replace a three-iterator std::equal in pki/input.cc.\n\nChange-Id: I0a7d6a2330594e383c5c884632de9a21a137054c\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/65647\nCommit-Queue: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\nReviewed-by: Adam Langley \u003cagl@google.com\u003e\nAuto-Submit: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\nCommit-Queue: Adam Langley \u003cagl@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "aa8f80118658841258a67e0f62c7a51e66e0b5ae",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "include/openssl/span.h",
      "new_id": "044ada1ab9bc8adaaab8d188e392a194fc949853",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "include/openssl/span.h"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "a0d8af617a898fc5e9bb81ea54bff9b2e46ad1c1",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "pki/input.cc",
      "new_id": "12ee450e7b8c8c15e7f2a635f0d60fd973318b62",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "pki/input.cc"
    }
  ]
}