)]}' { "commit": "4111dd2fc215e49ff3b01e735da087ee72779758", "tree": "a788a0d0799c6c195e0960f89265fc02e808e194", "parents": [ "186df3a655fcd290f7d74b5415091149cc164289" ], "author": { "name": "David Benjamin", "email": "davidben@google.com", "time": "Sat Jan 20 09:11:50 2018 -0500" }, "committer": { "name": "Adam Langley", "email": "agl@google.com", "time": "Tue Jan 23 21:06:42 2018 +0000" }, "message": "Don\u0027t compute a per-scalar window size in wNAF code.\n\nSimplify things slightly. The probability of the scalar being small\nenough to go down a window size is astronomically small. (2^-186 for\nP-256 and 2^-84 for P-384.)\n\nChange-Id: Ie879f0b06bcfd1e6e6e3bf3f54e0d7d6567525a4\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25144\nReviewed-by: Adam Langley \u003cagl@google.com\u003e\n", "tree_diff": [ { "type": "modify", "old_id": "e3b6437b6b259a87a25b1dd39882f6b769bbf8fc", "old_mode": 33188, "old_path": "crypto/fipsmodule/ec/wnaf.c", "new_id": "d0a79f72de6efc8beb20c42476b4d2a8e6a0f98b", "new_mode": 33188, "new_path": "crypto/fipsmodule/ec/wnaf.c" } ] }