Switch to rules_license

Apparently Bazel has deprecated the built-in licenses() command and now
expects you to pull in an external package. I think I've gotten this
right?

Since our new BUILD.bazel file is actually referenced by the old
-with-bazel branch, this new dependency also needs to work there. That
is still using the legacy WORKSPACE system, but I got that working there
too, I think. However, as the legacy WORKSPACE system does not consider
recursive dependencies, anyone using it and updating BoringSSL will need
to, in turn, update their WORKSPACE file on update.

Fixed: 365824757
Change-Id: I7b49f33d628cec2ec07a47f0e31f16765d0f532a
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/71147
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Lawson <benlawson@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
4 files changed
tree: e47c2193e2d0df40d5c63eeacbd95a62495da781
  1. .github/
  2. cmake/
  3. crypto/
  4. decrepit/
  5. fuzz/
  6. gen/
  7. include/
  8. pki/
  9. rust/
  10. ssl/
  11. third_party/
  12. tool/
  13. util/
  14. .bazelignore
  15. .bazelrc
  16. .clang-format
  17. .gitignore
  18. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  19. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  20. BUILD.bazel
  21. build.json
  22. BUILDING.md
  23. CMakeLists.txt
  24. codereview.settings
  25. CONTRIBUTING.md
  26. FUZZING.md
  27. go.mod
  28. go.sum
  29. INCORPORATING.md
  30. LICENSE
  31. MODULE.bazel
  32. MODULE.bazel.lock
  33. PORTING.md
  34. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  35. README.md
  36. SANDBOXING.md
  37. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: