Pretend AMD XOP was never a thing.

It's not clear that any AMD XOP code paths are being properly tested.
AMD dropped XOP starting in Zen.

Here's the one place I found (without looking too hard) where it seems
there is a XOP code path in BoringSSL, in Most of the
other XOP code was removed.

$code.=<<___ if ($avx && $SZ==8);
	test	\$`1<<11`,%r10d		# check for XOP
	jnz	.Lxop_shortcut

Change-Id: Id3301b2c84648790d010dae546b8e21ece1c528d
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <>
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <>
1 file changed
tree: e507e7a3fd2564bf8997d5bea83c800bb6b8f9b0
  1. .clang-format
  2. .github/
  3. .gitignore
  7. CMakeLists.txt
  15. codereview.settings
  16. crypto/
  17. decrepit/
  18. fipstools/
  19. fuzz/
  20. go.mod
  21. include/
  22. infra/
  23. sources.cmake
  24. ssl/
  25. third_party/
  26. tool/
  27. util/


BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: