Avoid conversion overflow from struct tm.

See discussion in
https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/65967/comment/4b0fb2a6_78bfab3a/

struct tm is defined with tm_ values as all ints.

Conversion inside this code is all bounds checked around valid
times and can't overflow, but because struct tm uses 1 based months
and 1900 based years, we need to modify the input values when
converting a struct tm.

Rather than do awkward bounds checks, just accept an int64_t on
input and we don't have to care.

OPENSSL_gmtime_adj gains checks to ensure the cumulative days
and seconds values passed in may not overflow.

While we are here we also ensure that OPENSSL_gmtime_adj does
not modify the output struct tm in the failure case.

Also while we are here, just make the offset_seconds value of
OPENSSL_gmtime_adj an int64_t - because long was never the
correct type.

Add tests for all this.

Change-Id: I40ac019c4274b5388c97736cf85cede951d8b7ae
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/66047
Commit-Queue: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
3 files changed
tree: eab096e78e264f0956366a985bf910de8a05f194
  1. .github/
  2. cmake/
  3. crypto/
  4. decrepit/
  5. fuzz/
  6. include/
  7. pki/
  8. rust/
  9. ssl/
  10. third_party/
  11. tool/
  12. util/
  13. .clang-format
  14. .gitignore
  15. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  16. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  17. BUILDING.md
  18. CMakeLists.txt
  19. codereview.settings
  20. CONTRIBUTING.md
  21. FUZZING.md
  22. go.mod
  23. go.sum
  24. INCORPORATING.md
  25. LICENSE
  26. PORTING.md
  27. README.md
  28. SANDBOXING.md
  29. sources.cmake
  30. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: