|author||David Benjamin <firstname.lastname@example.org>||Sat Jan 20 09:36:51 2018 -0500|
|committer||CQ bot account: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>||Tue Jan 23 21:29:13 2018 +0000|
Remove r_is_inverted logic. This appears to be pointless. Before, we would have a 50% chance of doing an inversion at each non-zero bit but the first (r_is_at_infinity), plus a 50% chance of doing an inversion at the end. Now we would have a 50% chance of doing an inversion at each non-zero bit. That's the same number of coin flips. Change-Id: I8158fd48601cb041188826d4f68ac1a31a6fbbbc Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/25146 Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <email@example.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <firstname.lastname@example.org> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: