Test async BIO_flush and fix a corner case

We were simulating non-blocking writes, but not non-blocking flush.
Model it as consuming one byte in AsyncBio.

In doing so, fix an obscure corner case in DTLS: If flushing after ACK
blocked, the next try would write a new ACK to the transport. There's no
real harm in this (we're running over UDP), but our tests intentionally
check for exactly the right number of writes and this was easy to fix.

This completely doesn't matter as a non-blocking writes on UDP-like
sockets are not really a thing, much less buffered non-blocking writes
on them. I don't even concretely know of anyone relying on BIO_flush in
TCP-like BIOs anymore in libssl. But since we try to support it, we
should test that we get it right.

Fixed: 381906252
Change-Id: I5296fcb01ca409d3026ca1150d6bdeaccc868014
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/81348
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
4 files changed
tree: 68d67eb89c402f09cad1cb5d5414e9cbbde6982f
  1. .bcr/
  2. .github/
  3. cmake/
  4. crypto/
  5. decrepit/
  6. docs/
  7. fuzz/
  8. gen/
  9. include/
  10. infra/
  11. pki/
  12. rust/
  13. ssl/
  14. third_party/
  15. tool/
  16. util/
  17. .bazelignore
  18. .bazelrc
  19. .bazelversion
  20. .clang-format
  21. .gitignore
  22. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  23. AUTHORS
  24. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  25. BUILD.bazel
  26. build.json
  27. BUILDING.md
  28. CMakeLists.txt
  29. codereview.settings
  30. CONTRIBUTING.md
  31. FUZZING.md
  32. go.mod
  33. go.sum
  34. INCORPORATING.md
  35. LICENSE
  36. MODULE.bazel
  37. MODULE.bazel.lock
  38. PORTING.md
  39. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  40. README.md
  41. SANDBOXING.md
  42. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: