| commit | 2e2a00337a96833562a0db4875c1b899bee56407 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> | Mon Nov 10 14:44:49 2025 -0500 |
| committer | Boringssl LUCI CQ <boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> | Mon Nov 10 12:06:04 2025 -0800 |
| tree | 9ba15c45acc4afcbe778790f0d61390dee80155d | |
| parent | 3a6dd1a0f3cf810081bbf266cd0a48b6ae3c8078 [diff] |
Update all the Bazel things It seems we need Bazel 7.6.2 or later to pick up a fix to the apple_support package for the newest Xcode. Ideally we'd go to 7.7.0, but CIPD seems not to have a package. While I'm here, update other deps from BCR. Change-Id: I30c339eda4aab22beed11d0acf1094dc5e16e4c9 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/83947 Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Reviewed-by: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com> Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Commit-Queue: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: