runner: Stop handle interrupts reentrantly in DTLS tests

Currently, the MTU and ExpectNextTimeout interrupts are handled directly
in the BIO_read call, while the SSL operation is on the stack. This
doesn't match how normal callers work and is probably largely working on
accident because our BIO_read stack traces are fairly controlled.

Instead, generalize all the handling into an "interrupt" that we need to
stop to handle. In doing so, just pass the SSL object into the
PacketedBio. I'm not sure that split was doing anything and just adding
some boilerplate.

We don't seem to quite yet break anything here, but reasoning about this
made my head hurt, so just fix it before anything gets worse.

Change-Id: Iaa32631413d6204e09f3a15f06542f0a504414a1
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/87171
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
4 files changed
tree: 9eb8f4ea641633fdc3a11873c93c03288391bbad
  1. .bcr/
  2. .github/
  3. bench/
  4. cmake/
  5. crypto/
  6. decrepit/
  7. docs/
  8. fuzz/
  9. gen/
  10. include/
  11. infra/
  12. pki/
  13. rust/
  14. ssl/
  15. third_party/
  16. tool/
  17. util/
  18. .bazelignore
  19. .bazelrc
  20. .bazelversion
  21. .clang-format
  22. .clang-format-ignore
  23. .gitignore
  24. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  25. AUTHORS
  26. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  27. BUILD.bazel
  28. build.json
  29. BUILDING.md
  30. CMakeLists.txt
  31. codereview.settings
  32. CONTRIBUTING.md
  33. FUZZING.md
  34. go.mod
  35. go.sum
  36. INCORPORATING.md
  37. LICENSE
  38. MODULE.bazel
  39. MODULE.bazel.lock
  40. PORTING.md
  41. PRESUBMIT.py
  42. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  43. README.md
  44. SANDBOXING.md
  45. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: