Take another pass at EVP_MD_CTX and EVP_CIPHER_CTX documentation There is a bit of a mess surrounding uninitialized stack-allocated objects that forces us to diverge from OpenSSL 1.1.x a bit. Since this is such a mess, move EVP_DigestInit to the deprecated section. Add tests for that behavior. Additionally, the reuse behavior of EVP_CipherInit_ex is *extremely* complex. Take a stab at documenting this. Change-Id: I99f494cae853f2f5e74aaea2670a62e0f8194c40 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/95787 Reviewed-by: Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: