Extract C++ files, rather than C, when working around Bazel bugs

To work around Bazel's bugs around mixed C/C++ targets
(https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/issues/22041), we automatically
split all of our targets in two.

When we did this, we originally pulled the C files into their own
target. This had the side effect of building assembly files with the C
files instead of with the C++ files. In principle, this does not matter,
but Bazel likes to turn targets into shared libraries, and our assembly
files still contain a couple references to OPENSSL_ia32cap_P (see
https://crbug.com/42290548). Those references rely on OPENSSL_ia32cap_P
being a hidden symbol, and statically linked with the assembly files.

Pull the C++ out instead, to avoid this. Once
https://crbug.com/42290548 is done, either will work, but this is
needed for now.

Bug: 362664827
Change-Id: Icb929d194ee2311707fe1a0bb27ea0ccaf96a510
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/70690
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
1 file changed
tree: ec6192fe8b09d09d99ea3f133b658d1fdffe3a43
  1. .github/
  2. cmake/
  3. crypto/
  4. decrepit/
  5. fuzz/
  6. gen/
  7. include/
  8. pki/
  9. rust/
  10. ssl/
  11. third_party/
  12. tool/
  13. util/
  14. .bazelignore
  15. .bazelrc
  16. .clang-format
  17. .gitignore
  18. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  19. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  20. BUILD.bazel
  21. build.json
  22. BUILDING.md
  23. CMakeLists.txt
  24. codereview.settings
  25. CONTRIBUTING.md
  26. FUZZING.md
  27. go.mod
  28. go.sum
  29. INCORPORATING.md
  30. LICENSE
  31. MODULE.bazel
  32. MODULE.bazel.lock
  33. PORTING.md
  34. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  35. README.md
  36. SANDBOXING.md
  37. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: