Test ACKing and reassembly of post-handshake messages

When it comes to receiving post-handshake, we're mostly already OK. Go
ahead and test that.

I say mostly because we probably should ACK as soon as we've gotten a
complete message. (Though we'd need to be careful not to ACK too many
times we've already got a bunch of messages queued up.) On the other
hand, outside of unit tests driving KeyUpdate, there isn't really a huge
issue to delaying the ACK and thus KeyUpdate by 100ms, so maybe it's not
that big of a deal.

Bug: 42290594
Change-Id: I86d1b81ddb5ebb98022b12659fafa9f8d4fd26d0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/73147
Reviewed-by: Nick Harper <nharper@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
2 files changed
tree: a3ab6d0ecc1b1ef0b4480a029ee0e516b202d0d4
  1. .bcr/
  2. .github/
  3. cmake/
  4. crypto/
  5. decrepit/
  6. docs/
  7. fuzz/
  8. gen/
  9. include/
  10. infra/
  11. pki/
  12. rust/
  13. ssl/
  14. third_party/
  15. tool/
  16. util/
  17. .bazelignore
  18. .bazelrc
  19. .clang-format
  20. .gitignore
  21. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  22. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  23. BUILD.bazel
  24. build.json
  25. BUILDING.md
  26. CMakeLists.txt
  27. codereview.settings
  28. CONTRIBUTING.md
  29. FUZZING.md
  30. go.mod
  31. go.sum
  32. INCORPORATING.md
  33. LICENSE
  34. MODULE.bazel
  35. MODULE.bazel.lock
  36. PORTING.md
  37. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  38. README.md
  39. SANDBOXING.md
  40. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: