| commit | 23db7e0e997af4f959cfc2c5df8f5a036132e923 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com> | Wed Dec 10 10:47:15 2025 -0800 |
| committer | Boringssl LUCI CQ <boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> | Thu Dec 11 07:32:39 2025 -0800 |
| tree | 292b53c101d7e88dbf2f8b23afeb94dae4bd5b2b | |
| parent | 351be94e5d23ce66944c5c2343487c284b6a0462 [diff] |
Revert "Revert the initial seal/openv implementations" This reverts commit 5837867c9bedf5e9dec7dd2606b30cbf4153ea43, thereby bringing back commits 0b3bd177c1cc8abae01bc4e57852e6586436152b and 7a8c43cae95e51b7a9049d57bc598e6b843e295f. This should no longer be necessary as the test timeouts should have been addressed by: - 5f74ff46e527ea1cfeeb70c0fc120ed2a8613cfb: test fewer combinations of splits as AAD and iovec splits need not be tested against each other independently (simply as all code processes either one or the other, they're never concatenated or similar, so nothing about AAD's iovec structure can possibly impact how the plaintext/ciphertext is handled or vice versa - with the one exception of ChaCha20-Poly1305's asm optimization toggle, but I verified that we still hit all cases even with this change). - 7ac5099c6b7e86e27f6febe5a02e113073b8a4b2: run seal tests only once, not twice. - 5f3949e91a3982ee415140979af5e451c358b13c: skip iovec tests for NIST CAVP vectors (as AES-GCM also has other test vectors which should suffice). Change-Id: I4499b89b8e6fabea03e495431fc2b85c3d515265 Bug: 383343306 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/85488 Auto-Submit: Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: