)]}'
{
  "commit": "fc6e5a737220624ee0134ef0b41bd63226db68d7",
  "tree": "fc4fb2b6c02772d213f458d1803dc30669b363f6",
  "parents": [
    "d2f0ce80a2b994c8aa246ac5e64bb0c27eb6a25b"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "David Benjamin",
    "email": "davidben@chromium.org",
    "time": "Tue Jan 19 15:36:43 2016 -0500"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Adam Langley",
    "email": "agl@google.com",
    "time": "Wed Jan 20 17:26:13 2016 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Drop the silly \u0027ECDH_\u0027 prefix on X25519.\n\nI got that from the TLS 1.3 draft, but it\u0027s kind of silly-looking. X25519\nalready refers to a Diffie-Hellman primitive.\n\nAlso hopefully the WG will split NamedGroups and SignatureAlgorithms per the\nrecent proposal, so it won\u0027t be needed anyway. (Most chatter is about what\nhashes should be allowed with what NIST curves, so it seems like people like\nthe split itself? We\u0027ll see.)\n\nChange-Id: I7bb713190001199a3ebd30b67df2c00d29132431\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/6912\nReviewed-by: Adam Langley \u003cagl@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "ad76b8c0abc084fc83dd6260d37ead8fe1a81b95",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "ssl/internal.h",
      "new_id": "c3982d0b0ba925e16a9bab1ce0b1fc2f1b59fe19",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "ssl/internal.h"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "45c5b26bf282da62741cd6dbfc6263693f5b829e",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "ssl/ssl_ecdh.c",
      "new_id": "cad8ebc0eb79e94afc4fc902fb803824cfc4a446",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "ssl/ssl_ecdh.c"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "8cad57a83da0450ee4993101334f6a99cb01b315",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "ssl/t1_lib.c",
      "new_id": "68c380a91d44e316cd8d434e4c900b3a7138e764",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "ssl/t1_lib.c"
    }
  ]
}