Disable fork detection test on qemu.

Its madvise() is still broken today (just in a different way from the
past - it still returns success on invalid advice flags, which means
that we cannot distinguish pre- and post-MADV_WIPEONFORK implementation
versions of qemu.

I also thought of another way - namely, checking MADV_WIPEONFORK on a
MAP_SHARED mapping - which qemu correctly refuses, but FreeBSD's
linux.ko does not. So given it's inaccurate anyway, let's keep the
current detection and behaviour as is, namely, that we always draw
entropy when needing random data when on qemu.

Change-Id: Ib28994d8d22a7360dcfdcc8a6cc5e66f6a6a6964
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/95107
Reviewed-by: Xiangfei Ding <xfding@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Xiangfei Ding <xfding@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com>
1 file changed
tree: 62cc39dd3af12821406469c678cde15a73f4974b
  1. .bcr/
  2. .github/
  3. bench/
  4. cmake/
  5. crypto/
  6. decrepit/
  7. docs/
  8. fuzz/
  9. gen/
  10. include/
  11. infra/
  12. pki/
  13. rust/
  14. ssl/
  15. third_party/
  16. tool/
  17. util/
  18. .bazelignore
  19. .bazelrc
  20. .bazelversion
  21. .clang-format
  22. .clang-format-ignore
  23. .clangd
  24. .gitattributes
  25. .gitignore
  26. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  27. AUTHORS
  28. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  29. BUILD.bazel
  30. build.json
  31. BUILDING.md
  32. CMakeLists.txt
  33. codereview.settings
  34. CONTRIBUTING.md
  35. FUZZING.md
  36. go.mod
  37. go.sum
  38. INCORPORATING.md
  39. LICENSE
  40. MODULE.bazel
  41. MODULE.bazel.lock
  42. PORTING.md
  43. PRESUBMIT.py
  44. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  45. README.md
  46. SANDBOXING.md
  47. SECURITY.md
  48. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: