)]}'
{
  "commit": "ce514698f56b2cdb37cfe42de1a2e8010cd15186",
  "tree": "c0d2aa8dec9a4397c9cf0ed455f50057191834aa",
  "parents": [
    "d9e817309a6860bca4addd5c0d034897d66d3913"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Adam Langley",
    "email": "agl@google.com",
    "time": "Fri Oct 30 14:19:01 2015 -0700"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Adam Langley",
    "email": "agl@google.com",
    "time": "Fri Oct 30 17:24:03 2015 -0700"
  },
  "message": "Fix a missing initializer that only Clang warns about.\n\n89d4a68c introduced -Wmissing-field-initializers because it seemed\ngenerally useful. However, Clang and GCC have differing opinions about\nwhat counts as missing. This change should make Clang happy too.\n\nChange-Id: I070c719f5c47f537207200d5399e093cc083e58f\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "628bb2999731028ad383b10ccd9fb2c616c73a63",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "ssl/d1_srtp.c",
      "new_id": "115bd70f6e885826f729afd7da59121382ff818a",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "ssl/d1_srtp.c"
    }
  ]
}
