tree 678d4b54b3e24a40c607edfbf5b142564d6cc374
parent f78fe19fc98e0e6f760e05c6b9d48725004700d0
author David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> 1701465700 -0500
committer Boringssl LUCI CQ <boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com> 1701729815 +0000

Fix build with -Wmissing-field-initializers

Since it's otherwise pretty tedious, let's try this with C99 designated
initializers. From testing, I remember they worked pretty reliably in C.
(In C++, it's a little trickier because MSVC won't accept them outside
C++20. Although I think all our supported MSVCs have a C++20 mode
now...)

Fixed: 671
Change-Id: Ia29ade8721ecfe2140a2d183ad60c8a730c631f0
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/64447
Auto-Submit: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Beck <bbe@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>