)]}'
{
  "commit": "a4c3f8de4406c2382e43e88a638882fb1a32da32",
  "tree": "f4c723f9a69b1545ea567d5bd0dc1fbb4154f9da",
  "parents": [
    "672efb1f8ee029762e29ff16811b68a071a0528e"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "David Benjamin",
    "email": "davidben@google.com",
    "time": "Thu Jan 18 18:06:58 2024 -0500"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Boringssl LUCI CQ",
    "email": "boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Mon Jan 22 19:14:08 2024 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Document assumptions made by bssl-crypto\u0027s unboxed HMAC_CTX\n\nI believe it is currently fine, but we probably should either box it, or\nget to the point that the assumptions are less precarious. Rust FFI is\nanything but safe.\n\nBug: 682\nChange-Id: I4b45dd3c3f58fb0ce7c0b8b80b1e6d7d2f7f119f\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/65627\nReviewed-by: Adam Langley \u003cagl@google.com\u003e\nCommit-Queue: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "f499c468ff3a174f97c6781a9b5d433ae75778f3",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "crypto/fipsmodule/digest/digest.c",
      "new_id": "52197c1e9e7f4f63e97c583da35568ec972009c3",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "crypto/fipsmodule/digest/digest.c"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "95188626c7f442521c1216652e02d7975b49f09e",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "rust/bssl-crypto/README.md",
      "new_id": "678f45ebe84aec2c5864620c776578d1fc8e78d5",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "rust/bssl-crypto/README.md"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "bf482f760ef7ca10ed8c1b8680f1f61ca3eb97e4",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "rust/bssl-crypto/src/hmac.rs",
      "new_id": "5924fa8b3f68dfd070742f52031cd8a0ff039822",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "rust/bssl-crypto/src/hmac.rs"
    }
  ]
}
