CI console: Specify category and short_name explicitly for all builders

This removes get_category and get_short_name from main.star. These tag
heuristics may cause naming conflicts based on stale assumptions.

Instead, explicitly define category and short_name for each builder.
This is more readable and avoids implicit logic, per
infra/config/README.md.

This is a refactor only and does not generate any diffs in the generated
configs.

Change-Id: Ie28c28e8c7438591c99eeb8d685899ff6a6a6964
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/101647
Auto-Submit: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
Presubmit-BoringSSL-Verified: boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com <boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com>
1 file changed
tree: 7f4b8624db831076eeb8a4607aeac82491f47819
  1. .agents/
  2. .bcr/
  3. .github/
  4. agents/
  5. bench/
  6. cmake/
  7. crypto/
  8. decrepit/
  9. docs/
  10. fuzz/
  11. gen/
  12. include/
  13. infra/
  14. pki/
  15. rust/
  16. ssl/
  17. third_party/
  18. tool/
  19. util/
  20. .bazelignore
  21. .bazelrc
  22. .bazelversion
  23. .clang-format
  24. .clang-format-ignore
  25. .clangd
  26. .gitattributes
  27. .gitignore
  28. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  29. AUTHORS
  30. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  31. BUILD.bazel
  32. build.json
  33. build.json.tmp
  34. BUILDING.md
  35. CMakeLists.txt
  36. codereview.settings
  37. CONTRIBUTING.md
  38. FUZZING.md
  39. go.mod
  40. go.sum
  41. INCORPORATING.md
  42. LICENSE
  43. MODULE.bazel
  44. MODULE.bazel.lock
  45. PORTING.md
  46. PRESUBMIT.py
  47. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  48. README.md
  49. SANDBOXING.md
  50. SECURITY.md
  51. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: