)]}'
{
  "commit": "4bfab5d9d7c2ab190007a938cb377e5e68b01255",
  "tree": "dde5dceb286047a8f94ec898434a29dfe5bd93ab",
  "parents": [
    "fa81cc65dd39c990bb68cc1fbb44329dd05d96e2"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "Adam Langley",
    "email": "agl@google.com",
    "time": "Wed Jan 23 13:52:17 2019 -0800"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org",
    "email": "commit-bot@chromium.org",
    "time": "Wed Jan 23 22:38:56 2019 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Make 256-bit ciphers a preference for CECPQ2, not a requirement.\n\nIf 256-bit ciphers are a requirement for CECPQ2 then that introduces a\nlink between supported ciphers and supported groups: offering CECPQ2\nwithout a 256-bit cipher is invalid. But that\u0027s a little weird since\nthese things were otherwise independent.\n\nSo, rather than require a 256-bit cipher for CECPQ2, just prefer them.\n\nChange-Id: I491749e41708cd9c5eeed5b4ae23c11e5c0b9725\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/34504\nCommit-Queue: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\nReviewed-by: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "e0f75c375b2e8de88b14bc0faf144795098f7e25",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "ssl/test/runner/runner.go",
      "new_id": "974a371619415525f8d7aee36dc3145fce7fb30f",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "ssl/test/runner/runner.go"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "562fecb035c8ccc1e4f6454cd60c5fa10d3b705a",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "ssl/tls13_server.cc",
      "new_id": "caaf0c7484cf21c60cc3addcdf9b120205193522",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "ssl/tls13_server.cc"
    }
  ]
}