)]}'
{
  "commit": "413704be8c0ee3a29908b80b6645587697863d1a",
  "tree": "e731148bd2668cd24cfaa9da80ef3f3a50f84c6a",
  "parents": [
    "de49ac9e9137da880bf642f2751cbdbbd0f2e11e"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "David Benjamin",
    "email": "davidben@google.com",
    "time": "Sat Sep 06 14:27:42 2025 -0400"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Boringssl LUCI CQ",
    "email": "boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Mon Sep 15 20:37:59 2025 -0700"
  },
  "message": "draft-ietf-lamps-x509-policy-graph is now RFC 9618\n\nI\u0027ve kept most of the comments in crypto/x509/policy.cc, but since we\nnow cite a document that defines the policy graph, we no longer need to\njustify it in the comment.\n\nChange-Id: Ice83ee436246c06ebd65e6a6e77299e55c2b63dc\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/81968\nReviewed-by: Adam Langley \u003cagl@google.com\u003e\nAuto-Submit: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\nCommit-Queue: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "453576a903d33ce65c3109e0f1bc0004f12d32aa",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "crypto/x509/policy.cc",
      "new_id": "1e3d406e5b0d0120801b704aa361fc681d35f0f4",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "crypto/x509/policy.cc"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "ca3942d952fff77c6e295b37bf08f5ddbc1c1859",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "include/openssl/x509.h",
      "new_id": "52d2b8bce1e55a18a9f656152d9f8c5542cdca15",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "include/openssl/x509.h"
    }
  ]
}