Move more side-specific code out of tls13_process_certificate.
tls13_process_certificate can take a boolean for whether anonymous is
allowed. This does change the error on the client slightly, but I think
this is correct anyway. It is not a syntax error for the server to send
no certificates in so far as the Certificate message allows it. It's
just illegal.
Change-Id: I1af80dacf23f50aad0b1fbd884bc068a40714399
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9072
Reviewed-by: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Langley <agl@google.com>
CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
diff --git a/ssl/tls13_client.c b/ssl/tls13_client.c
index 376e0ac..9dc49232 100644
--- a/ssl/tls13_client.c
+++ b/ssl/tls13_client.c
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@
static enum ssl_hs_wait_t do_process_server_certificate(SSL *ssl,
SSL_HANDSHAKE *hs) {
if (!tls13_check_message_type(ssl, SSL3_MT_CERTIFICATE) ||
- !tls13_process_certificate(ssl) ||
+ !tls13_process_certificate(ssl, 0 /* certificate required */) ||
!ssl->method->hash_current_message(ssl)) {
return ssl_hs_error;
}
