)]}'
{
  "commit": "2e8ba2d25d18d37ac36f5aea07b546c7221d4d1c",
  "tree": "5cbc24d49904c6ab26c4fd5f674cdd4a32e664f8",
  "parents": [
    "95d7a498cceb6a1eff93b175cad10d97c1e9fb82"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "David Benjamin",
    "email": "davidben@google.com",
    "time": "Thu Jun 09 16:22:26 2016 -0400"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Adam Langley",
    "email": "agl@google.com",
    "time": "Thu Jun 09 21:27:54 2016 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Use one C99-style for loop.\n\nSwitch one for loop to the new spelling as a canary. All our compilers seem to\nsupport it fine, except GCC needs to be told to build with -std\u003dc99. (And, upon\ndoing so, it\u0027ll require _XOPEN_SOURCE\u003d700 for pthread_rwlock_t.)\n\nWe\u0027ll let this sit for a bit until it\u0027s gotten into downstreams without issue\nand then open the floodgates.\n\nBUG\u003d47\n\nChange-Id: I1c69d4b2df8206e0b55f30aa59b5874d82fca893\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/8235\nReviewed-by: Adam Langley \u003cagl@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "3c5db6306a4b45bf8d54cdc38b8bffdc776c90c4",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "CMakeLists.txt",
      "new_id": "bd7f4329e06e9e69b944bd2e9647d13c5b869bc9",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "CMakeLists.txt"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "7d73c735f840adb778491965686f39d3019fd588",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "crypto/mem.c",
      "new_id": "c83eb5a22806fc100c533bc814a775a93dc8f3cd",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "crypto/mem.c"
    }
  ]
}