Introduce macro BORINGSSL_ALWAYS_USE_STATIC_INLINE.

This will control use of `static inline` even when compiling as C++.

This is related to symbol renaming, as `static inline` functions do not
need to be renamed; however it is not recommended to generally use this
in C++, as use of `static inline` functions from `inline` functions
typically violates the ODR. This should unblock use of symbol-renamed
BoringSSL with Swift, as in that configuration all symbols will either
be `static inline` or use the `redefine_extname` mechanism.

(May also want to consider switching to this for Rust)

Bug: 42220000
Change-Id: I63cde49b8e1d20adc1478c53805261086a6a6964
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/89867
Auto-Submit: Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Xiangfei Ding <xfding@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Rudolf Polzer <rpolzer@google.com>
4 files changed
tree: 923164b56e9c2a9411db567ea8527642336e009a
  1. .bcr/
  2. bench/
  3. cmake/
  4. crypto/
  5. decrepit/
  6. docs/
  7. fuzz/
  8. gen/
  9. include/
  10. infra/
  11. pki/
  12. rust/
  13. ssl/
  14. third_party/
  15. tool/
  16. util/
  17. .bazelignore
  18. .bazelrc
  19. .bazelversion
  20. .clang-format
  21. .clang-format-ignore
  22. .gitignore
  23. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  24. AUTHORS
  25. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  26. BUILD.bazel
  27. build.json
  28. BUILDING.md
  29. CMakeLists.txt
  30. codereview.settings
  31. CONTRIBUTING.md
  32. FUZZING.md
  33. go.mod
  34. go.sum
  35. INCORPORATING.md
  36. LICENSE
  37. MODULE.bazel
  38. MODULE.bazel.lock
  39. PORTING.md
  40. PRESUBMIT.py
  41. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  42. README.md
  43. SANDBOXING.md
  44. SECURITY.md
  45. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: