| commit | 163f29af076a2fcc5564f7998ab57e3fb9b197b7 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> | Thu Jul 28 11:05:58 2016 -0400 |
| committer | CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org> | Fri Jul 29 21:05:49 2016 +0000 |
| tree | 13f271b348f13295929cd117e442766dc23f4b08 | |
| parent | e97fb48fbe7220197973c4083dd069b2f5618d64 [diff] |
Move post-handshake message handling out of read_app_data. This finishes getting rid of ssl_read_bytes! Now we have separate entry-points for the various cases. For now, I've kept TLS handshake consuming records partially. When we do the BIO-less API, I expect that will need to change, since we won't have the record buffer available. (Instead, the ssl3_read_handshake_bytes and extend_handshake_buffer pair will look more like the DTLS side or Go and pull the entire record into init_buf.) This change opts to make read_app_data drive the message to completion in anticipation of DTLS 1.3. That hasn't been specified, but NewSessionTicket certainly will exist. Knowing that DTLS necessarily has interleave seems something better suited for the SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD internals to drive. It needs refining, but SSL_PROTOCOL_METHOD is now actually a half-decent abstraction boundary between the higher-level protocol logic and DTLS/TLS-specific record-layer and message dispatchy bits. BUG=83 Change-Id: I9b4626bb8a29d9cb30174d9e6912bb420ed45aff Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/9001 Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> Commit-Queue: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com> CQ-Verified: CQ bot account: commit-bot@chromium.org <commit-bot@chromium.org>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: