)]}'
{
  "commit": "15a76eb224ec4eff94d00565ee7d13b1f5a3a6cc",
  "tree": "b703feaf7a91071758ea4ed073f2e71149967160",
  "parents": [
    "f58aa24e661d528e07f7c59574926aebb4e92c14"
  ],
  "author": {
    "name": "David Benjamin",
    "email": "davidben@google.com",
    "time": "Sat Jan 27 13:24:51 2024 -0500"
  },
  "committer": {
    "name": "Boringssl LUCI CQ",
    "email": "boringssl-scoped@luci-project-accounts.iam.gserviceaccount.com",
    "time": "Tue Jan 30 04:51:57 2024 +0000"
  },
  "message": "Rewrite bn_big_endian_to_words to avoid a GCC false positive\n\nI got a -Wstringop-overflow warning in GCC 12.2.0, targetting 32-bit\nArm. It\u0027s a false positive, but rewriting the function this way seems a\nbit clearer. (Previously, I tried to write it in a way that truncated if\nthe bounds were wrong. Just make it a BSSL_CHECK.)\n\nChange-Id: Iaa3955f08f320f2c376ca66703e4dd29481128fd\nReviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/65867\nReviewed-by: Bob Beck \u003cbbe@google.com\u003e\nCommit-Queue: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\nAuto-Submit: David Benjamin \u003cdavidben@google.com\u003e\n",
  "tree_diff": [
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "aca0e38ef41a21ade53bd2010404399cbb25bf3c",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "crypto/fipsmodule/bn/bytes.c",
      "new_id": "d7f70dad6a1d9063e3264e67bf4cb1407f225657",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "crypto/fipsmodule/bn/bytes.c"
    },
    {
      "type": "modify",
      "old_id": "a0133efe0258cad2cf62243f6eb417b80a847903",
      "old_mode": 33188,
      "old_path": "crypto/fipsmodule/bn/internal.h",
      "new_id": "363a97e11b73fe6f14a3593862648f7269c9b1ce",
      "new_mode": 33188,
      "new_path": "crypto/fipsmodule/bn/internal.h"
    }
  ]
}