Allow DTLSv1_set_initial_timeout_duration to be called mid-handshake This is useful for WebRTC that "guess" a reasonable timeout duration based on first ICE rtt...but that can be wildly incorrect so modifying it can reduce worst case behavior. The patch a) modifies the timeout for next flight b) modifies ongoing timer(s). c) change representation of the DTLSTimer to keep a start time and a duration rather than only a expire time. --- Update test as (from davidben@ thanks!) The tests needed to AdvanceClock() because all the WriteFoo() methods buffer up a packet, with the other methods implicitly flushing. SetTimeout() was patterned after SetMTU() which was missing an implicit flush, but probably should have had one, to avoid reordering of signals. Once that's fixed, the original test is sensitive to the timeout / 4 business. While I'm here, trim the tests a bit. They included a bunch of bits that were part of exercising the core ACK machinery. But since that's already covered elsewhere, we really only need to drive the shim into a state with an ACK timer and try a SetTimeout --- Update-Note: DTLSv1_set_initial_timeout_duration now also affect ongoing flights. You might need modify your code to check for timeout after calling the function. Bug: webrtc:404763475 Change-Id: Iaea911c38e2e7cfc056728d9f47530729032ffc2 Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/86167 Commit-Queue: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com> Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.
Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.
Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.
BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.
Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.
Project links:
To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.
There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: