Revert "SSL_CREDENTIAL: Check that configured private key actually has one"

This reverts commit 73cd946964c555a39730592db4b540accbafac6c.

Reason for revert: breaks use of opaque EVP_PKEYs

Original change's description:
> SSL_CREDENTIAL: Check that configured private key actually has one
>
> This CL uses the new helper EVP_PKEY_has_private to ensure that a key
> passed to SSL_CREDENTIAL_set1_private_key actually contains a private
> key.
>
> Change-Id: I293a913f597cf803ea84c212bc7d18d76a6a6964
> Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/88028
> Commit-Queue: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>

# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed > 1 day ago.

Change-Id: I934af1dd161e8e365e1543d2f71479826864fa44
Reviewed-on: https://boringssl-review.googlesource.com/c/boringssl/+/89487
Commit-Queue: Lily Chen <chlily@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Benjamin <davidben@google.com>
2 files changed
tree: e57d970aa3fe7d3255bfe792906d88fb1489c985
  1. .bcr/
  2. .github/
  3. bench/
  4. cmake/
  5. crypto/
  6. decrepit/
  7. docs/
  8. fuzz/
  9. gen/
  10. include/
  11. infra/
  12. pki/
  13. rust/
  14. ssl/
  15. third_party/
  16. tool/
  17. util/
  18. .bazelignore
  19. .bazelrc
  20. .bazelversion
  21. .clang-format
  22. .clang-format-ignore
  23. .gitignore
  24. API-CONVENTIONS.md
  25. AUTHORS
  26. BREAKING-CHANGES.md
  27. BUILD.bazel
  28. build.json
  29. BUILDING.md
  30. CMakeLists.txt
  31. codereview.settings
  32. CONTRIBUTING.md
  33. FUZZING.md
  34. go.mod
  35. go.sum
  36. INCORPORATING.md
  37. LICENSE
  38. MODULE.bazel
  39. MODULE.bazel.lock
  40. PORTING.md
  41. PRESUBMIT.py
  42. PrivacyInfo.xcprivacy
  43. README.md
  44. SANDBOXING.md
  45. SECURITY.md
  46. STYLE.md
README.md

BoringSSL

BoringSSL is a fork of OpenSSL that is designed to meet Google's needs.

Although BoringSSL is an open source project, it is not intended for general use, as OpenSSL is. We don't recommend that third parties depend upon it. Doing so is likely to be frustrating because there are no guarantees of API or ABI stability.

Programs ship their own copies of BoringSSL when they use it and we update everything as needed when deciding to make API changes. This allows us to mostly avoid compromises in the name of compatibility. It works for us, but it may not work for you.

BoringSSL arose because Google used OpenSSL for many years in various ways and, over time, built up a large number of patches that were maintained while tracking upstream OpenSSL. As Google's product portfolio became more complex, more copies of OpenSSL sprung up and the effort involved in maintaining all these patches in multiple places was growing steadily.

Currently BoringSSL is the SSL library in Chrome/Chromium, Android (but it's not part of the NDK) and a number of other apps/programs.

Project links:

To file a security issue, use the Chromium process and mention in the report this is for BoringSSL. You can ignore the parts of the process that are specific to Chromium/Chrome.

There are other files in this directory which might be helpful: